004_dutch landscape

ellievsbear
Acquired Stardust

JBB: An Artblog!

Origami Around

blake kathryn
Misplaced Lens Cap

pixel skylines
styofa doing anything

Kiana Khansmith
RMH

Aqua Utopia|海の底で記憶を紡ぐ
almost home

oozey mess
🪼
One Nice Bug Per Day

#extradirty
wallacepolsom
Xuebing Du
seen from Czechia

seen from Malaysia
seen from United States
seen from Malaysia
seen from United States

seen from United Arab Emirates

seen from Netherlands

seen from Germany

seen from Germany

seen from Russia
seen from Switzerland
seen from United States

seen from Germany
seen from Netherlands

seen from Hong Kong SAR China
seen from Germany

seen from Germany
seen from United States

seen from Malaysia

seen from United States
@cyriacl
004_dutch landscape

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch • No registration required • HD streaming
OMA, Maison à Bordeaux, curtain system plan, 1998
Oskar Schlemmer, Diagram for gesture dance, 1926
OMA, Maison à Bordeaux, 1998
Stockhausen, Studie 2

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch • No registration required • HD streaming
relative space time
The complexity of the Maison à Bordeaux might be given by its ambiguous relation to temporality: the ephemeral and the permanent. If the ephemeral vanished, disappear, re-appear, change, it is constantly moving or at least, is movable. However, the movement of an object is not an action on its own, it is related to a set of spatial references that allow the mind to describe this movement. Such references are identifiable objects, permanent entities that become landmarks and then create a tri-dimensional coordinate system in which the temporary object move. If we stick to those objects, we can analyse the speed, the effect, the time, the materiality of the ephemeral. The interplay between those two temporalities becomes a dynamic spatial scenography. If an object moves inside a non-referential system, it becomes impossible to say whether it is really moving or not: a white dot on a black background is fixed as soon as another visible element shows-up in motion. And there is the trick, how can we say what is moving from what? Is the initial point or the new object in motion the reference? It is a subjective question in a way, that really depends on the physical situation of the observer. If the house was initially designed for accommodating the wheelchair of J-F Lemoine, other users, family related, have their own spatial experience. The referential system is different for everyone depending on their mobility. Considering the house as its own coordinate, forgetting about terrestrial gravity, Lemoine could say that is not the platform that moves through the different floors but the house that moves to him. We can say so because of the physical status of the platform: it is not an elevator, but literaly a piece of floor, which goes beyond the elevating device replacing the vertical circulation of the stairs. Looking at the bedrooms plan configuration, each member of the family has its own space, with different access, adapted to their morphology and capacity: the man, the woman, the children. There is an ambivalence, an intersection of realities, or parallel dimensions. Going back to temporality, if the movement is subjective to the situation of the observer, the same goes for time. If the platform creates ephemeral spatial situation inside the permanent building, it could also be the opposite depending on where you stand: the building creates an ephemeral situation around the permanent platform. The former becomes temporary where the latter is fixed in time and vice-versa. Yet, where the platform, as a solid object, has its own tectonic quality, its own structure, its own system, sliding elements add another temporal dimension. To a certain extent, we can suppose that the platform could be build without the house or the other way round, whereas, the sliding windows, doors or curtains – that we may describe as sliders – are dependent of the rails they are fixed in, themselves integrated into the thickness of the structure. The movement of the former is predetermined by the latter. The coordinate system is pre-established, no matter the situation of the observer, without impacting the spatial dynamism produced. If the morphology of the platform or other solid elements is given and constant, the shape or the position of sliders remains free inside the physical limits of their container. Instead of drawing lines, Koolhaas establish parameters, set of possibilities, set of temporalities. It allows a variety of encounters; situations where temporary configuration happens inside a substantial shell. If vertical coordinates are multiples and subjective, horizontal system is homogeneous and objective, in the way every observer agree on the possible movement. The combination of the two leads to a complex imbrication of time and spatial systems. That is where the structure, as the “combinator”, is fundamental. Composed of three independent objects, the transversal beam, the concrete stairwell, and the lateral stabiliser, none of them interrupt the visual complexity of the house. Instead, it is adding complexity when we realise that they all react to statics in different ways: flexion (horizontal forces), compression (vertical) and tension (structural moments switching from a horizontal position to vertical). Instead of supporting, they are attracting poles in the same way Einstein relativity explains gravity as the bending of space-time. All the forces of the solar system, and the universe in general, are balanced to accommodate life on this planet. The building is the product of forces that provide a dynamic environment of social interaction, demonstration and movement. It creates a new form of collectivity. The structure then becomes a multi-directional spine that articulates different coordinate systems working with their mutual relation to time and space. Every user, therefore, evolves in a multiverse that intersects at some point to create what we could call a multi-stage. The concept of the multiverse in science is a very abstract idea inherited again from the Greek, which is hardly visualised, and relies on the existence of several worlds ruled by other entities than gravity and time, other referential systems. It might be a bit extreme to relate it to architecture, but it is in line with the “complexity” of the Maison à Bordeaux. So how do we go beyond the visual quality of the actual object of the house to reveal graphically the complexity of its virtual object or system? Looking at the axonometry technique, explored at the time by OMA team working on the project, we will try to unveil this articulation of space-time dimension stretching around attractors. The axonometry indeed go beyond the hierarchical illusion of perspective, providing a drawing “without depths”, displaying every information on the same level. But drawing an axonometry using formal pattern would be an inefficient copy of what has already been done. To describe objectively the nature of each system and their intersection, we would refer to scientific diagrams, vectors, coordinates, data as a mathematical spatial understanding.
Maison à Bordeaux, Exploded frames, layer of opacity
Site frames, layers of opacity
Considering tectonics as the aesthetics of statics and its psychological impact, how can we talk about it, represent it in order to analyse it? How do we talk about the ground, the landscape and the in between of floors?
Casa Malaparte, territorial frame

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch • No registration required • HD streaming
Maison à Bordeaux, territorial frame
Bernard Cache, Earth Move: The Furnishing of Territories, 1995
Adalberto Libera, Casa Malaparte, 1938
OMA, Maison à Bordeaux, 1998
Adalberto Libera, Casa Malaparte, 1938

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch • No registration required • HD streaming
statics and plane
Following Bernard Cache’s frame hypothesis as the abstract principle behind an architectural space, we can wonder what is the territorial intervals that the Casa Malaparte and the Maison à Bordeaux implement on their respective site?
If an interval is “the basic component of causality” according to Eugène Dupréel reaction to rationalists (cited by Cache), it is still contained in frames of probability that established themselves on a site. They separate, isolate from an existing milieu; frame as a wall, and afterward they select, connect back to the surroundings; frame as a window. The frame and the interval are crucial in the study of those two villas, especially through the notion of uncertainty. Cache indeed, is very critical toward what he calls the “modern interval” as a reducer of probability caused by the ever-increasing smoothness of planes. Yet, where the very static casa Malaparte is carved out from the rock, the Maison à Bordeaux seems to be in a constant state of equilibrium standin on a hill. Therefore, we can look at the way the planes as floors are articulated, how do they accommodate the site to let this interval taking place? how do people move through them? How those surfaces are interconnected? Are they contained by the ground or by the building? Of course, this is questioning the tectonic strategy of those two buildings in relation to their respective “intervals”. Reading Adrian Forty’s Spatial Mechanics, I was very intrigued by the discretisation process of a scientific analysis, and its implication in architecture. We can assume that “discretisation” is closely related to “decoding”, in the way that both processes try to unveil the system of an experience by decompose it into smaller entities, more specific, more precise. Combined, they constitute the richness of this same experience. So, if we study how the surfaces, or the floors of the villas are interrelated we need to understand how are they standing and balanced? What is the structure that hold them together? But structure is too generic and as Forty, we would talk about compression, stress, tension, torsion, equilibrium, centrifugal… Diving into this structural complexity we could then relate it back to the ground where these architecture stands.
OMA, Maison à Bordeaux, 1998