This article is a great example of why explanations based on a single case, with no comparative perspective, don't work. Every "cause" of Thailand's troubles identified in the piece is common in some form to many other countries with mixed records of democratization. The only partial exception is the persistence of the monarchy in Thailand, but the aspects of that institution discussed in the piece are not unique. In a sense, the surprise in Thailand may not be the frequency of coups and democratic breakdown as much as the lack of escalation of those clashes into bloodier conflict (cf. Argentina, Chile, etc.).













