и эта свобода

All of this in one day (the biggest attack occured at night).

russians hitting important cultural buildings is nothing new, they destroyed countless of churches and museums, but this night feels like they were targeting specifically everything significant to ukrainian culture and identity. And after that they and their supporters dare to say "where's your culture? you have none".

Art and culture is NEVER out of politics. THIS is why we're so mad when westerners keep praising anything related to russian culture itself. While people are praising their culture, russians are actively stealing and destroying ours.

>onions

>my onions

yes there are morphic resonance theory enjoyers and Jacob-did-nothing-wrong creationists, but those people are wizards

Like, I literally was in a workplace training at a company that the computer touchers here have all probably heard of in 2020 where we were all told that Black people are actually indigenous to the Americas. I have seen some other positions that seem obviously insane presented as fact by people who had authority, from church pulpits (“the Haitian revolution succeeded because Tousant Louvitur sold the people of Haiti to the devil for a hundred years”) and college lecterns (“Nobody ever starved to death under communism”). My sense of how obviously fucking bonkers cuckoo bananas vs literally the enforced party line within an institution an idea is has been calibrated by being hit with large rocks by powerful crazy people from every corner of the political compass.

Because people used science to justify their prejudices that they already had, you -- and progressivism as a whole -- have convinced yourself that if you say one of a bunch of obviously and objectively true things, then you will have to kill black people for eugenics. Even though these statements are obviously and objectively true and have bo political valence to them, you cannot allow yourself to see any daylight between "humans can inherit traits from their parents" and "we have to kill black people for eugenics."

The rest of us can notice "it is obviously and objectively true that humans can inherit traits from their parents" and yet not think this means we need to kill black people for eugenics, but progressives can't, and thus they make it everyone's problem. When you are not allowed to notice obviously and objectively true things, this prevents you from being able to take effective actions.

It's fitting, I guess, since historically progressives were the most gung-ho about killing black people for eugenics. Those programs you mention were not put into place by Nazis, after all. Instead of saying "maybe progressives were wrong to think the obvious and objectively true fact that humans inherit traits from their parents means that we should kill black people for eugenics," progressives decided "the only way we can stop ourselves from killing black people for eugenics is not letting anyone notice humans inherit traits from their parents."

Well, according to you, saying that black people are congenitally retarded isn't prejudice, it's a rational assessment of honest fact, it's an obvious and objectively true statement.

I said "humans inherit traits from their parents." This is obviously and objectively true, because humans have DNA and that is how DNA works.

You heard this obviously and objectively true scientific fact and jumped immediately to "this person must be saying black people are retarded and should be sterilized."

I did not say that. I do not believe that. That is a laughably wrong statement, and your claim I said it is also a laughably wrong statement. There is a gap that is a fucking light-year wide between "humans inherit traits from their parents" and "black people are retarded and should be sterilized." You have to make a bunch of other assumptions, you have to hold a lot of other beliefs, and you have to make a bunch of different decisions to come to that conclusion.