XVIII-century Unholy Family in CMYK

blake kathryn

Andulka
TVSTRANGERTHINGS
Aqua Utopia|海の底で記憶を紡ぐ

★

Kiana Khansmith

cherry valley forever
Cosimo Galluzzi
Mike Driver

@theartofmadeline
Fai_Ryy
official daine visual archive

Discoholic 🪩
sheepfilms

PR's Tumblrdome
d e v o n

izzy's playlists!

⁂
2025 on Tumblr: Trends That Defined the Year
seen from Canada
seen from Bangladesh
seen from Tunisia

seen from Saudi Arabia

seen from Tunisia
seen from Pakistan

seen from Brazil

seen from Bangladesh
seen from Bulgaria

seen from India
seen from Uzbekistan
seen from Portugal
seen from India
seen from United States

seen from Russia
seen from Lithuania

seen from United States
seen from United Kingdom
seen from Lithuania
seen from United States
@blueteainfusion
XVIII-century Unholy Family in CMYK

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch • No registration required • HD streaming
You two hug it out for her too?
download killing upload pain. instant thousand deaths to brain. motherboard on murder spree. blood computer victory.
online chilling upload nice. posts give life a little spice. cpu is pure and true. internet for me and you :)
Girl….what did you think of THAT Claudia scene?
omg i was TRYING to wait until post-finale to vent all my feelings but aaahhhhh twist my arm
Honestly ever since ppl started vaguely teasing "anti-blackness in ep6" ive had a tightness in my chest. I was so nervous for weeks and weeks and really built it up in my head as this big horrible thing, so when I finally sat down and watched it...it kind of underwhelmed me at first? My immediate reaction was one of confusion...because nothing about the character we saw in ep6 resembled Claudia. At all. I was so bewildered it took me sitting with it a while to even feel upset about it.
Which could also be attributed to how ineffective the writing is this season, bc none of it moves me. The jokes don't make me laugh, the 'romantic' parts don't make me feel tender, the tragic parts don't make me feel sad...even the most vile/over the top cruelty barely makes me feel anything. I didn't even feel bad for Louis in this scene!!!! Bc none of it felt real (and also bc he barely seems to feel anything about it himself. they aren't even invested enough in their own flogging of Louis to show him suffering over it...Louis tried to kill himself when he heard Claudia's voice in 205...Louis and Claudia parted on far less hostile terms with a heartfelt goodbye in 106 and Louis wanted to kill himself then. Louis would be ashes rn if this shit was serious!!!) This is a show that used to be a GOTHIC HORROR MELODRAMA ROMANCE all genres that LIVE on heightened emotion!!!!! And this season is a cynical dry passionless husk......they've really bled all these characters of their human essence and rendered each and every one of them a cardboard cutout of themselves. It's the most insane waste of potential I've ever seen.
The thing about this episode, is that it convinced me that isn't an accident.
With all the constant in-text mocking of iwtv ("missing the psychodrama of Dubai?", Lestat laughing at Louis's turning speech, mocking Louis's romanticizing of Dreamstat, the constant calling Louis a liar and ripping apart the book full of his words without meaningfully calling out any specific part of his account...Lestat is not pissed off at Louis bc he made up a ticket pocket, like to this day we do not know what exactly in this book is the big lie he's mad about. and he's spent the whole season being mad.....meaning the point here is not to dispute or provide a contrasting POV, but only to ridicule and illegitimize) and the marketing push to court a new audience, it seems like their final push to distinguish tvl from the thorny, nuanced, deeply emotional, queer niche critical darling that it once was is to make this season of television a hit piece on its first two seasons. Every single choice seems like it was purposefully made in order to spite the original series and everyone who ever loved it for what it was (with a special personal vendetta against the person who was heart and soul of that series, Louis/Jacob).
Its only natural that this season's climax is to attempt to retroactively destroy the emotional core of s1-2, which is Louclaudia.
Louis's story is a story of grief. The common jabs people like to throw at Louis about him being whiny or passive or brooding or a sad sack or whatever - that's because his whole character is built around the concept of grief. Louis is the embodiment of a mother's grief over losing her child, the grief Anne Rice was consumed with when writing IWTV. He is grief personified.
(From The Vampire Companion)
The IWTV novel does not exist without Anne Rice's incredible love for and grief over losing her daughter, and Louis's story does not exist without his incredible love and grief over Claudia.
At first I thought they were honoring Louis's characterization by having his storyline continue to focus on his grief. I had my doubts about the Regina plotline (bc what else do they have to say now about Louis other than 'he grieves'? what does this plot add? isn't it just a retread of his journey in s1-2? if he immediately regresses, what was the significance of "I own the night"?), but the core of it is still Louis's love for Claudia, and Louis's grief wouldn't fade away overnight just because he grew as a person. I was actually pleased that in The Lestat Season, Louis was allowed to spend his time, not thinking about Lestat, but still focused on Claudia, even as Lestat spends all his time bitching Louis out (which is also kind of a 105 retread now that I think about it).
But what episode 6 revealed to me, was that the new addition they had for Louis's story was to undermine his grief. Louis was wrong to grieve, he was selfish to grieve. The person Louis exists to grieve not only hates him, but hates him for grieving her. In the hands of the writers of s3, Louis's love for Claudia is forged as a weapon against him, and his pain at her loss is an indictment of his character.
S3's Claudia is angry with him for grieving her. The first thing out of her mouth is "couldn't keep me on the wall". Claudia, who knew all too well (and according to s3, actively weaponized) Louis's incredible depth of love for her, is upset that the person who loved her so intensely mourns her....why? It doesn't make any sense for her to feel this way...of course Louis mourns her, and always will. Would she rather have vanished from the world without a trace, having left no one behind who loved her enough to care she existed? Would she rather have burned in a house fire when she was 14, died alone and unwanted as an unnamed casualty, the way Lestat said was her destiny?
It's not only nonsensical, it doesn't feel like the character. Claudia, who was so desperate to be loved and seen, to belong, to be "put first" by someone.....begrudges Louis for doing just that? Miss "picked another one over me/never about me" would rather Louis never say her name again??
I really can't even see this being as representative of Claudia in any way. So much of what they have her say in this scene goes directly against her character, and, despite all its overwrought viciousness, she doesn't even take Louis or Lestat to task for some of what we know she saw as their greatest offenses!!!!!!!!
Things Ghost Claudia Mentions:
-Louis grieving her. She, in essence, tells him NOT to grieve her, implies it insults her to grieve her, "burn her diaries, burn this dress". Like I said, this is not something Claudia would fucking say lmao even if she was speaking from a place of deep anger, she would not want to be erased, even if the dress on the wall is just a symbol to remind Louis that he fucked up, and that she suffered as a result, she would want to keep a record of the damage.
-Louis being 'back with Lestat' (which he isn't, really, romantically speaking. like they are at most back in a talking stage. so its pretty unclear what the scope of her knowledge is bc she knows about stuff like Lestat's "song on the radio" but not their most recent interactions? idk)
-She says she only didn't kill Louis so she could keep him around to do her bidding until she found someone better. I believe there is a book quote where Claudia says something along these lines and thats what they're pulling from (I couldn't find it though..), but in the books Claudia actually needs a companion to survive. She is in the body of a five year old and is emphasized as being very physically vulnerable; regardless of whether bookClaudia loved/hated Louis, there is a practical element to her choice to keep him around.
But in the show, Claudia is not physically 5 but 14 and a prodigious hunter who goes on killing sprees alone. She has no physical need for Louis that would justify this idea of her keeping him around despite "hating" him. Her need for companionship in the show is solely reduced to her emotional needs (and if she hated Louis, he would not fulfill that). You just can't take any of this shit seriously if you watched the first two seasons...Claudia was always returning to Louis, she was ensnared by the coven because she returned to Louis. Louis was dead weight in Eastern Europe, an active hindrance, hallucinating, depressed, why not leave him? He isn't any help to her in that period, which was years of them not getting along; she was the one that spoke the languages, she was the one keeping him fed, she pulls the revenant off of him. She doesn't need Louis to survive there, she wants him. She returns to him time again because she wants him. Meaning disintegrates without him...
(Obvs Lestat is included in her statement about missing them, but we only see her follow Louis...I really thought we would get at least one flashback of Claudia bonding with Lestat or even just missing him like this esp if they're gonna try to sell us on him being "her favorite" but no.....there wasn't even an attempt so i have no choice but to call bs)
-Louis "read the diary pages seven decades too late". I already discussed how Claudia was averse to anyone reading her diaries in this other post so i won't go over that again, but it is another inept writing choice that even when they want to vilify Louis here, they can't do it right. Claudia saying something like "it took too long" for Louis to read the pages eliminates the entire moral dilemma of Louis reading and presenting the pages without her consent...shouldn't Claudia be more upset because he violated her privacy in the first place? Nope...apparently he should have done it sooner...? Not to mention that Claudia took years to open up to Louis about Bruce, so this idea that she was waiting around on him to do something about it doesn't add up...if anything s1 Claudia seemed to scoff at the idea of him being able to avenge her with her "knight in vengeful black" comment. also no mention of Louis killing the coven in her name....which he did do immediately lol....like...
(also the fact they have Claudia chastise LOUIS for crying like the sa happened to him when they literally overlaid her words with Lestat's trauma crashout and textually made her sa about Lestat.................LMAO!! unserious)
-She says she fabricated the train scene (or at least exaggerated it) to get Louis to cooperate with killing Lestat. Obvs there is a whole heinous layer where the train scene was evoking the imagery of runaway slave captures and these white writers decided to have a black character lie about this specific kind of racialised trauma which is fucked beyond compare. BUT ALSO!!!!!!!!! IT JUST DOESNT MAKE SENSE WITH THE PLOT!!!!!!!!!!! Claudia DECIDES TO KILL LESTAT AT THE END OF 106 BECAUSE HE DOESN'T LET HER LEAVE.......why would she return with Lestat if she didn't feel sufficiently threatened? and why would she decide to kill Lestat if he did not force her to stay against her will??
I've seen it floated that this was all Claudia's master plan to get Louis to go with her (even though she hated him sooooo much.........right....) as though she had her whole tearful goodbye and then magically changed her mind moments later and decided to do her big one and concoct a scheme to eliminate Lestat and ensure Louis would be 'on her side' and leave with her. Maybe that's even what the 306 scene is supposed to lead us to believe...only there is no scene of Claudia telling Louis what happened on the train, or ever using that event to convince Louis to turn on Lestat. All their telepathic conversations we hear about Louis trying to dissuade her from killing Lestat, and its never once a point Claudia uses to her favor. Ever. We get "we have no more use for him. He causes us misery with no horizon. I can kill him. You will enjoy it" etc. This idea of "oh daddy Lou he was ever so mean to me do you know what he said he'd do!" is a brand new invention for this scene alone.
Also.................
Uhhhhhh........no Claudia.....it pretty famously did not???????????
"Worked good, didn't it?" 😏 LMAO! They made her stupid??
Also they still can't decide what Claudia was threatened with. We get "I won't defile your pocket, I'll turn your bones to dust" in 106, "Did I threaten Claudia with rape on a train?" in 301 and "He'd do worse than rape me" in 306.....so.......which is it..........
-The blood thing feels too obvious to even be worth pointing out?? But they've invented this weird blood supremacy thing for Claudia to devalue Louis and value her maker more (even though they do have the same blood bc they both have Lestat's blood....that's why they're like....siblings....). When Claudia hated the idea of Lestat's blood THROUGH LOUIS being used to create Madeleine (supposedly the only character Claudia gaf about...but she forgot the whole lead up to her turning which was her begging Armand to do it for this very reason....mkay)
-And then ok the whole slave thing. Yes Claudia used the word "slave" in s1. But the context is everything when it comes to black characters using this kind of loaded language. Claudia uses "slave" in s1 specifically to refer to their lack of agency as long as Lestat is around. Claudia uses that very loaded language privately to Louis telepathically in order to emphasize the dire nature of their (shared!) situation! And obvs that phrase has a special resonance for them as black ppl living under the thumb of a white tyrant, and references the racialized nature of Lestat's control and abuse of them! She's saying "he treats us like his slaves! this way of life is not acceptable! we have to act!" Claudia was never using that word as an insult against Louis!!!! She used slave ONLY EVER TO DESCRIBE THEM BOTH!!!
Funny how the context of that word from its first use in a season that had black writers has been completely warped into blatant white supremacist ideology in a season without black writers...a phrase exchanged privately to discuss the oppression shared by black characters in order to encourage rebellion in s1, has become an excuse for a racist tirade from one black character to another in front of a white character in s3...
Also making Claudia spout this anti-black nonsense shows they never paid attention to her character bc she was the one most explicitly calling out Lestat's tyrannical whiteness; besides "he's made us slaves" she makes a lot of comments in 107 that align Lestat with violent white supremacy (calling Bach, which Lestat likes, the music of the master race, "Massa's had so much pain in his life" explicitly calling out that she and Louis should not give a fuck about the pain of their oppressor, "well-dressed tyrants, where have I heard that before" when Lestat compliments Nazi tailoring basically calling Lestat one of them). Like as much as Louis would go back and forth with Lestat about racism, Louis doesn't rly ever call Lestat out as espousing white supremacist thinking as harshly as Claudia does.
(Tbh they kinda fucked up this aspect of her character in s2 with her...y'know...dating a Nazi sympathizer and never giving Madeleine anything more than a raised eyebrow about it, but she was never fucking antiblack...and she at least has that "Armand's skin is darker than yours" comment to show race (and the race of Louis's partners) is a thought in her mind...the more i reflect, the more i acknowledge issues with s2 Claudia but my word i never would have foreseen this....)
This slave stuff combined with Claudia misusing nappy (bc that among black ppl means unkempt hair, and Louis's hair was extremely kempt in the scene - but ofc if ur nonblack and racist nappy just means any black hair so), "bleak black life" sounding like some bullshit from The Help, Claudia speaking to Lestat and referring to Louis as "your black queen" which is not a phrase any one of the three of them would ever use LOL, and even just Claudia's repeated use of "bitch" which is also not a word we have heard Claudia use - it's one of the most aggressively straightforward black stereotypes ive seen in modern media. They took a complex, beautiful black character who was treated with so much love and care for 2 seasons and made her an Angry Black Woman.jpeg. I know they wanted to work in a "MHMMMMM" or "OH HELLLLL NAW" sooo bad. Like Claudia's whole vernacular is different!!! She did not talk like that!! It's like every racist fanfic in this fandom ever!!
Things Ghost Claudia DOES NOT MENTION:
-ANY of the abuse suffered by her or Louis!!!!! In Claudia's last moments on Earth she was fighting through the pain of her slit ankles to cuss out Lestat for dropping Louis like an egg. She offered herself to be punished in Louis's place in 105, and then spent painstaking months nursing him back to health after he was dropped. One of the biggest rifts in her relationship with Louis was when Louis would not leave Lestat despite his abuse of them. Not a single mention of this from the ghost. Even if they wanted to focus on battering Louis in this scene, they didn't even have her bring up Louis choking her in 107, physically stopping her from burning Lestat's body! None of the physical violence that tore apart that household even gets a passing reference.
-Louis ruining Claudia's plan to kill Lestat. Louis's big misstep with Claudia was, in her mind, "choosing Lestat over her". Louis felt unable to leave Lestat in 106. Louis slit his throat, but wouldn't burn him, so they couldn't move on post-NOLA, and lived in fear of his return. She was calling him "dead weight" in Eastern Europe. He carried Lestat, "slowed them down". This was the principle grudge against Louis Claudia carried with her after s1, and it also is not mentioned.
-HER MAKING!!!!!!!!!!!!!! The biggest fucking thing about this character in the books and show is that she forced into a child body for eternity without her consent!!!!!!!!!! It's the original sin of the unholy family, the first wedge to ever be driven between them, a point of contention between Louis and Lestat, Louis and Armand, Claudia and Louis, Claudia and Lestat, THE COVEN who kills her; it's the choice Lestat is haunted by in Body Thief! "Should she have been made or was she a mistake?" "Can she endure, or is she doomed by the circumstances of her birth?" "I WAS STILL BREATHING, WHY DIDNT YOU TAKE ME TO A HOSPITAL! I COULD HAVE LIVED A NORMAL LIFE SWEEPING FLOORS NURSING BABIES!!! WHO AM I GONNA LOVE, WHO WOULD WANT ME!!!!!" Even as late as the trial, Claudia is upset hearing about the extent of Louis's involvement in her turning. SHES IN ETERNAL VAMPIRE HELL BECAUSE SHE WAS MADE!!!!! BY THESE TWO MEN!!!!!!!!!!!! if there was ANYTHING the real Claudia would have screamed at them about it would be this!!!!!! AND HER GHOST DOESNT BREATHE A WORD ABOUT IT!!!!!!! It's so fucking egregious, you have to wonder if any of these writers watched the show
-The Regina stuff????????? If Claudia knows about Lestat's music career, surely she would have witnessed what Louis's been doing too, right? That's not something she would have some shit to say about?? If its the roast of Louis like how is that not her opener. "Yes its really me and not that broke bitch you paid to be my stand in". The Regina plotline truly had no bearing on anything ig
-Charlie???? This show hates black ppl now so I guess they couldn't have Claudia mourn a black boy (only her white gf they fetishized in the previous ep). but they literally showed a flashback to Lestat forcing Claudia to watch Charlie burn THIS SEASON (reshot with Delainey) and drew a parallel to Lestat watching Nicki burn. so....why make that parallel and not have that incident be important to Claudia? its almost like they dgaf
Literally everything about this scene does both Claudia and Louis a disservice. Make no mistake, it may seem like Louis is the target here, but BOTH their characters are being mutilated by this season. This person that we see in this scene is in no way Claudia. s1-2 are contingent upon having empathy for these black characters and being invested in the incredible, complicated, heart-wrenching, deeply loving bond they share. The story is built around Louis's grief over Claudia and therefore Louclaudia is the emotional backbone of the original iwtv series. Tvl has shown itself to be deeply committed to undermining, ridiculing, and eviscerating the notion of the Louclaudia bond and their respective integrity as characters.
It sincerely feels like this writers room has a vendetta against the original series and Louis as its protag by extension, and their hate for Louis so great they can't fathom anyone loving him. and Claudia loved Louis deeply despite all the pain and turmoil of their relationship, and they don't know how to write that, so they're dismantling that bond any way they can. It's disgusting and horrific but also kinda fucking boring.....this show was SO revolutionary bc it was a gothic genre show that took black ppl's experiences and pain seriously and centered them instead of sidelining them and handled them with an empathy that is so rarely afforded to us....and its been mangled into this ghoulish hateful conservative slop.
and they want to do a story with a black female villain next season????? fucking lol........like you just have to laugh.......
(even if they do the Merrick thing of it actually wasn't her ghost all along like. we still had to sit through that. it wouldn't actually change anything. the show gave airtime to these ideas. it might even be worse bc then its just using Claudia as a hammer to wack Louis over the head with while diminishing her place in the narrative even more. its a lose-lose)
batb au
aaaaaand one caramellstat for dessert

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch • No registration required • HD streaming
Hi, i'd love to hear your thoughts on this if you're okay with me asking: what if the racist comment from daniel wasn't actively daniel and rather lestat's imagination of what daniel might have said? lestat did say during louis and daniel's meeting he wouldn't know what was said since he wasn't there in person, so could this not also apply to everything else happening this season as it's all told by lestat (who already minimized or didn't understand racially charged remarks during s1) and the audience is "listening" to his retelling on the vinyls even if other characters speak
It's complicated because on the one hand I can absolutely see Lestat's version of Daniel being a kind of dialed up version of reality, making him extra rude, extra loud mouthed, and also tacking on him being loudly racist and homophobic too. But if that was the case I think they should have made that more overt in Lestat and Daniel's dynamic, even if it was just a throwaway line from Lestat implying that Daniel is probably a racist or something, just something to lay a trail of breadcrumbs to that. It's annoying because I don't want this show to have to hold my hand and explain it's intentions, but they've kind of dug their own grave with this one.
The problem I have is that the show has kind of lost any grace I might have been willing to give it by being so loud and insistent about this season being something entirely new and trying to separate it from the previous two seasons. If this was Interview With The Vampire Season 3, I might have been a lot more willing to let my trust in the writers from their racial storytelling and sensitivity carry forward into this season, but instead they've axed their Black creatives and hailed this as a separate project, something that can be watched without the first two seasons (I do not agree AT ALL that that is the case either), something that an audience who didn't enjoy the first two seasons can love. And I just have to question who exactly this new audience that they're trying to reach is, because unfortunately the more the season goes on the more it looks like they're trying to bring back a white audience who were alienated by a show which centered around a Black man and his racial identity.
I said this when I was talking about the pronouns joke in episode 1 too but I just don't think a room of cis, predominantly white writers should be dropping "jokes" like these because even if there is intention behind it, even if it's going to be examined and called out for what it is later down the line, I don't think casual transphobia and anti-blackness are things that an audience of people who are directly affected by these things should have to just sit with. Gothic horror is all about sowing discomfort in your audience and letting them sit with that discomfort, but it's not the white audience who are having to sit with that discomfort, it's not the cis audience who are having to sit with that discomfort, it's minorities who were already living with that discomfort.
“Gothic horror is all about sowing discomfort in your audience and letting them sit with that discomfort, but it's not the white audience who are having to sit with that discomfort, it's not the cis audience who are having to sit with that discomfort, it's minorities who were already living with that discomfort.”
EVERYONE BE KINDER TO LOUIS NOW
for real how is Armand killing Claudia Larry and Nicki Lestat’s fault you absolute walnut
Fault? Maybe too big of a word here. But he absolutely contributed to it.
He asked Armand to put Nicki out of his misery, stood there and watched.
He rehearsed the play with Armand. Unless the show proves otherwise (5 episodes into the season, they didn't find the time to explain what was Lestat doing there. For all we know now, he really came to Paris for revenge and changed his mind mid-trial), he absolutely was complicit here. That's not even going into the reasons Louis and Claudia fled to Europe in the first place and Lestat's failure to warn them about Armand and the coven.
With Larry it's the least of Lestat's fault, but he involved Larry and the rest of the band into the vampire business, dragging them back multiple times despite the growing danger. And he was a dick to him and pushed him away, outside his protection. It's absolutely a parallel to Claudia's situation.
Have a lovely day, kind anon.
I think to me one of iwtvs biggest issues is that they went into the show operating on the fundamental assumption that their entire audience already cares about Lestat (which, obviously, many people do but that doesn't excuse lazy writing) and thus have largely failed to ACTUALLY provide any substantial reason for their audience to care about him beyond being like "well he's lestat, of course everyone loves lestat, what are you doing here if you don't love lestat??" And it's like idk man that's not enough for me! I need you to actually make me care! I need something more compelling than "his mom was mean" that offers a real throughline to his flaws established back in the first season!
I think he's actually the weakest written character BECAUSE of rolins blatant favoritism toward him because thus far he's largely relying on Sam's charisma, a pre-existing book fanbase, and fandom bias toward hot white men rather than actually writing him well
Honestly this doesn't need much added to it; it's a whole thesis statement. You're absolutely, perfectly right.
The producers/writers/creative team is acting like Lestat is so iconic everyone already knows (and likes!) him. They don't have to bother explaining certain things, or making their characterization make sense across seasons.
They've been hugging that copy of TVL and treating it the way other big franchise adaptations treat their source material. But the thing they don't seem to understand is that The Vampire Chronicles are VERY different than say, like. Lord of the Rings. Or Game of Thrones. Or Marvel.
In the audience makeup. In terms of what this particular bookish audience wants. In terms of how iconic and well-known and well-liked the source material even actually is. Including (and even especially) Lestat as a character.
Lestat isn't like Spiderman. Half the fandom barely knew who Lestat was before they started watching the show, which has so far given us
complicatedly shitty husband Lestat in s1
a mirage of a guy who wasn't really there so isn't actually the real character in most of s2
brief moments of the guy again being maybe shitty or not, for the moment left ambiguous, in one single episode
plus one nice reunion scene that addresses none of the rest of anything directly at the end the first 2 seasons.
And that's all just stuff the show-only audience would have to work with, in terms of buying into this guy at this point.
That's not even getting into it being much more complicated when you think of the book readers. Many of whom, unlike more traditional genre fantasy, don't tend to put Anne Rice and her writing on an uncritique-able pedestal.
The other half of the fandom that came from the movies/books already has a complicated and at times unpleasant relationship to the character and his centrality. Because Anne Rice also infamously did a bad job justifying her shift from Louis to Lestat as protagonist in the books. When it comes to greenlighting a TVC adaptation, anyone who actually spent any time in the fandom would know when they went to adapt this whole thing: Anne Rice's approach to character writing and POV shifts is definitely a bug, not a feature. (I genuinely believe part of what has been going wrong with the show overall is that amc seems to have bought the rights to TVC thinking it was going to be some sort of franchise cash cow. When uhhh. I absolutely hate to say it, but. Queer stuff usually doesn't work like that. Because it's not mainstream enough in its viewerbase. And that's not to mention that they just seem to have a very odd understanding on a fundamental level of like. Who even really likes the TVC material. What kind of fan those people even are.)
Many book fans were excited and hopeful to see the show writers try to make sense of the nonsensical, unexplained twist that came from that shift in who the real main character was. And why they were so suddenly expected to care. Anne Rice infamously sort of flubbed this with her own audience. A lot of her own readers were very ready to see it get handled better. Not to see it get LESS justified. Not to see more of the same.
So yeah. The idea of treating Lestat like he's so iconic he needs no explanation or re-introduction? That being expected to like him requires no justification? Especially with something as jarring as a POV shift?
Wild. This is a particularly risky fandom to take that tactic with.
But! I guess we'll see how it goes in the rest of the season!

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch • No registration required • HD streaming
You know everyone and their mother is yelling at Louis to stay away from Regina and yes he should stay away from her, but no one wants to talk about what led him there. People love the "never been about me" to say how selfish Louis is to not let Claudia rest on account of his guilt. And sure maybe there is some selfishness- but Gods do people truly think it trumps the grief he feels? Do people think grief, anger, guilt, loneliness, selfishness, and even hope, all of these are not intertwined within Louis? The fandoms want complex characters but then somehow can't help but reduce those they don't like- women, characters of color and even within them black characters- to a one tone note, and then blorbofy the next white male character that comes along. How different would it have been if Louis had a friend whom he could trust- did this fandom ever ask that? And that's another thing: for a long time the moment Louis started to trust someone, he immediately had his trust broken ( Lestat/Armand/Daniel) . So tell me how different would it have been if after everything Louis found someone who was willing to just sit and listen to him as a friend would do. Would he still be chasing after ghosts of dead daughters?
I once read a beautiful meta about how at his core Louis is lonely character. He withholds telling his lovers how much he loves them- but does that not in turn make him lonely too? Louis De Pointe Du Lac was a gay black man in Louisiana during Jim Crow. How much did he withhold- how much had he had to cut and trim himself like a bonsai to survive? Weight of the racist world, weight of a family who wants him to take up the mantle and be the MAN of the house, worry and love and grief over his brother...my God can you even imagine? All of those things bottled up within him. How can anyone ever expect him to shrug off all of that weight of him? And so who to tell so as to not compromise the image you have built to survive? Whom to share with? Who is there? So he used to visit Lily. And he brought back Daniel and talked to him throughout the night and into morning. And he reached out again to Daniel and invited him back to Dubai.
What I am trying to say is Louis needs a friend. Someone to sit with on a park bench and to talk and talk like old men do. And maybe he will have that one day; he was afterall trying to gently rebuild a friendship with Lestat before it all imploded with the release of that damn book and Lestat going "oh woe is me!!!" Yes 100% Regina shouldn't be swept up in Louis's life story, just like Claudia shouldn't have felt like she had to be her brother's keeper; but gods the way you all start to talk and then keep on talking about Louis- as if it is impossible to imagine someone lonely, who has been fucked over by life, to try and grasp at ghosts of a deceased loved one. His spark in the dark, remember?
God, people in the tags are being so mean to Louis over the Regina thing. He literally did not ask her to pretend to be Claudia! He was fully willing to give her 1k, 100k, 500k just because she asked for it. I really don’t think until she said “what now, daddy Lou” that he realised what she was offering in exchange and yes he’s not turning it down but he’s deeply unwell and seeing his daughter-sister in a stranger.
And that’s not anything against Regina either! She read the book and decided that yes she would be willing to playact his dead daughter-sister for half a million dollars. Kinda obsessed with her.
And yes it’s all very messy and unhealthy and fucked up dynamic and stalking-wise but people are acting like he’s the literal devil
ADHD advice from non-ADHD people: start blocking out your day and put things in your google calendar
ADHD advice from ADHD people: any time you're waiting for your food to microwave YOU HAVE TO WASH DISHES WASH AS MANY AS YOU CAN THIS IS A RACE AGAINST TIME THIS IS THE ONLY TIME THIS COULD HAPPEN

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch • No registration required • HD streaming