his first point was going to be “i don’t even get up at night to pee”

RMH
Today's Document
🪼

pixel skylines
AnasAbdin
taylor price

#extradirty
d e v o n
art blog(derogatory)
macklin celebrini has autism
trying on a metaphor
Cosmic Funnies

titsay
styofa doing anything
h
hello vonnie
occasionally subtle
he wasn't even looking at me and he found me
let's talk about Bridgerton tea, my ask is open

seen from Pakistan

seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from Poland

seen from Malaysia

seen from United States

seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from Netherlands

seen from Germany

seen from United States

seen from Uruguay
seen from United Arab Emirates
seen from Canada
seen from United States
seen from Tunisia
@bluejay-in-flight
his first point was going to be “i don’t even get up at night to pee”

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch • No registration required • HD streaming
Well, hey there guys, gals and non-binary pals! I decided (in my infinite wisdom if which there is none of) that I wanted to open up a writing challenge for people who wanted something a little out there. WELCOME TO HELLO HANKERCHIEFS! (An 18+ LGBTQIA multifandom writing event!)
RULES:
All participants in the event must use this form to generate their bingo cards. You can have as many or as little as you want to write!
Once all cards are generated and handed out over Tumblr/Discord, participants can then begin their fics at any time between that date and July 30th, 2026 (plenty of time to think about everything!)
All fics must have a rating between Teen and Up at the very least, Mature or Explicit due to the nature of the prompts being given.
All necessary tags must be included in the fic for content purposes, including the tag for the challenge, both in Tags and Collection if on AO3 and everywhere else if not (hellohankies2026)
No hate to anything written here! Anything goes when it comes to both participants' writing as well as the content of the cards.
Well, that's all from me, so I hope to see some new faces have a go at writing some of these and getting out there! See you soon!
~ Scott
UPDATE: Over 20 signups already! This is a month-long challenge, so there is room for more if you still want to take part or are on the fence! Thanks to everyone whose joined so far!
~ Scott
UPDATE: We now have more than 30 signups! Thank you so much to everyone who's come through! I also have 3 unclaimed bingo cards because some people have limited their Tumblr DMs. If you haven't received your card/s yet, please accept my follow request so I can get them to you!
*
the ladies’ home journal, sept 1948
The way that we learn about Helen Keller in school is an absolute outrage. We read “The Miracle Worker”- the miracle worker referring to her teacher; she’s not even the title character in her own story. The narrative about disabled people that we are comfortable with follows this format- “overcoming” disability. Disabled people as children. Helen Keller as an adult, though? She was a radical socialist, a fierce disability advocate, and a suffragette. There’s no reason she should not be considered a feminist icon, btw, and the fact that she isn’t is pure ableism- while other white feminists of that time were blatent racists, she was speaking out against Woodrew Wilson because of his vehement racism. She supported woman’s suffrage and birth control. She was an anti-war speaker. She was an initial donor to the NAACP. She spoke out about the causes of blindness- often disease caused by poverty and poor working conditions. She was so brave and outspoken that the FBI had a file on her because of all the trouble she caused.
Yet when we talk about her, it’s either the boring, inspiration porn story of her as a child and her heroic teacher, or as the punchline of ableist, misogynistic jokes. It’s not just offensive, it’s downright disgusting.
the reason the story stops once hellen keller learns to talk is no one wanted to listen to what she had to say
how’s that for a fucking punchline
Another part of the story that is often conveniently omitted is that Anne Sullivan, the “miracle worker” in question, was also a visually impaired woman (and abolitionist) who faced her own struggles finding accessible education. That was why she was able to teach Helen Keller and connect her with resources that would allow her to flourish in academia. When Helen Keller was railing against poverty-induced diseases that caused blindness, she was talking about things like trachoma which was what had caused her friend’s vision loss.
The fact that Sullivan is often portrayed as able-bodied in retellings of their story is indicative of the narrative that is most comfortable for an ableist society: that accessibility and equality are gifts bestowed upon the disabled by able-bodied heroes. Disabled children are never taught that they have the power to lift each other up, and that’s a crying shame.

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch • No registration required • HD streaming
This is echoing many other’s statements but it truly does feel like Fraction is writing (or at least pulling from) GM’s Bruce. The way he frames Bruce’s opinions on Talia (unwilling tourist in her world, abandoned her child to cause havoc) and Damian (burden laid upon him, a “ticking time bomb”) are both so reminiscent of Morrison’s run that it has to be somewhat intentional.
Now I think we all know the issues with using Morrison’s work (especially anything having to do with Talia), they used xenophobic, anti-arab, and just racist rhetoric and tropes in their writing. So Fraction’s continuing use of them is clearly emblematic of the continued racism within DC stories and his own personal biases.
If that doesn’t sway you though I do think on a narrative and character level choosing to do this is negative too, in regards to Damian and Talia but also in regards to Bruce—who the whole damn book is supposed to be about! By having Bruce think about and behave towards Damian like this is all the way back in 2010 we’re left with an emotionally immature and frankly emotionally abusive version of Bruce. Especially because Fraction hasn’t erased all of Damian’s growth (though definitely walked back a lot of stuff, which I’ve said before), for example Damian’s not particularly angry or argumentative with Bruce, he doesn’t insult him and he takes his lumps. At worst he’s sulky and a little obstinate due to his own self esteem issues, but Bruce is still reacting to him and talking about him like Damian is behaving the exact same way he did in 2010. It makes Bruce look awful, and regresses his character horribly.
This is a similar problem with Talia, he talks about her to Dr. Zeller in tone that has you suspecting he never even loved her, that he never wanted anything with her. That’s not only contradicted by the decades of stories before Morrison’s run (particularly SOTD) but also by runs we’ve had since then! Ram V had Talia saving Bruce several times, had Bruce reflecting on his love for her, hell even H2SH had Talia saving Bruce and them kissing. So what, am I to believe Bruce is just so bitter that he’s badmouthing her like this despite all that? That’s he’s forgotten it? That he’s so in to Dr. Zeller that he’s throwing the mother of his child under the bus? At best it makes him look stupid and selfish, and at worst it makes him look racist (“unorthodox traditions”).
'i've been letting myself go' because you're fatter? go where? the awesome factory?
going on a guilt trip do yall want anything
if you really cared about me you wouldn't have to ask
im going to invent a new berty i mean berry
too late boss

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch • No registration required • HD streaming
Every time Sean Astin makes a statement on whether or not Sam and Frodo were indeed gay for each other in lord of the rings he’s always like “well we have to acknowledge that attitudes around sexuality have changed dramatically over the past several decades and since authorial intent is only up to speculation, the story is open to multiple readings, some of which might have different significances for different groups of people also they kiss on the lips because I said so”
at the rose city comic con panel this month a fan asked them (sean and elijah) if sam and frodo were in love and they said
Sean: .....yes. absolutely
Elijah: 100 percent.
Sean: dont tell rosie
Rosie: "This is my husband Sam, and that's his husband, Frodo. Frodo is my husband-in-law. I'm not into him, he's he's a bit too 'elfy' for my taste, but Sam likes him, and that's fine with me. As far as I know, Frodo can't give Sam children, but Frodo looks after ours all the same, so I don't mind sharing Sam if it means another pair of eyes on the wee ones. In all honesty, our family tree is right simple compared to some hobbits. Yes, I'm referrin' to you Lobelia, over there pretendin' you ain't eavesdroppin'. Still bitter you ain't got either of my boys or their house, eh?"
Tbh it's canon that Frodo invited Sam and Rosie to move in to Bag End after their wedding and they all lived there for a couple of years until Frodo went to Valinor, so yeah. Running with it.
And once Rosie dies, Sam says his goodbyes and disappears after him.
what’s funny is people assuming that rosie would somehow be too dim or naive to KNOW that sam loved frodo, instead of looking at a guy who would loyally follow a beloved friend to hell and then help carry him home again, and not be like ‘oh i can’t not fuck that.’
Polyamory, specifically polyandry, would be an interesting solution to the oddball population of the Shire.
The Shire is excellent farming country, with consistently good weather, and only one tough winter in living memory; hobbits like to produce large families; they’re resistant to disease, rarely violent, and encounter few dangers. It is usual for hobbits to produce many children, so that (for example) Bilbo and Frodo are unusual in both being only children, with no siblings, and not having children of their own. All of this should point to a population that increases every generation if not doubling outright. Young people (and their ideologies!) should rapidly outnumber the old with an ever-increasing effect and impact on society. However, the Shire has a surprisingly stable history; it never seems to increase or decrease greatly in population, and the bell curve of age seems… demographically balanced? There certainly isn’t a conflict from rising young bloods challenging the middle-aged reactionaries; there’s no unemployment; there are no housing crises or waves of emigration, or even a tendency for young people leaving home to marry. Meanwhile, not only does the Shire not suffer from internal pressures, but it remains obscure and hardly noticed in global politics.
What makes sense here is that adult hobbits form a loose group. Four parents in a polycule, between them all, may produce four children. All four parents claim to have four children. An outsider would assume this meant the adults had eight children.
Hobbits therefore are not especially fertile or fecund. They simply have large families. Much of their interest in genealogy is due to the complex relationships of blood-kin, hearth-kin, love-kin and pledge-kin, who must all be carefully tracked and measured - not just because you need to make sure that you don’t climb into bed with an un-permitted degree of blood-kin, but to track family alliances and carefully quantify the precise level of thoughtfulness to put into the proper present to gift your father’s lover’s lover (too much implies a degree of intimacy that might upset the polycule.)
Thus, while a hobbit matron may tell a startled dwarf that she has seven sons, she might only have borne five of them herself, and have one hearth-son by her wife, and a pledge-son of her first husband’s. There are between three and four fathers involved at various stages of production, from conception to pledge-duty, but there is debate about the precise number of fathers, as one child was festival-conceived and therefore provisionally pledged to the Brandybucks until more distinctive paternal traits should materialise. It’s expected that four of the sons will be uninterested in women, and their contribution to family life will be in raising hearth-children and pledge-duty. However, this level of detail is normally negotiated later in conversation, as a mutual overture of friendship. So she’s just clear and simple: yes, certainly, she has seven sons. Yes, they’re all hers. Yes, that’s fairly normal - yes, hobbits like big families. How big? That’s really hard to say! Well, about thirteen hobbits live in her house… er, she has forty-three nieces and nephews. Yes! She has nine siblings, that’s correct, but some of them are still babies themselves..
In this way, a bewildered dwarf might assume that hobbits are absurdly fertile, producing an average of seven children per couple, at an absurd pace.
When in fact, with about half of hobbits never bearing biological children, the population of hobbits is pretty much always the same.
Tl:dr, hobbit population works perfectly well, both internally and in the perceptions of outsiders, if the majority of the Shire is gay, they’re all polyamorous, and they all firmly claim to be parents of high numbers of children. Of course Frodo fathered Sam’s kids - he named them! They were pledge-kin but not hearth-kin, as Frodo needed a lot of quiet and stability in the home.
No outsider ever parses hobbit genealogy well enough to understand this except for Gandalf, who never explains anything either.
are you kidding? Gandalf would WEAPONIZE his knowledge of Hobbit genealogy against outsiders
Since “pledge” kinships are multidimensional and can occur in different directions, hobbits can form - and formalise - family bonds simply because they choose to. Gandalf doesn’t tell anyone that the formation of Thorin’s Company, the Fellowship of the Ring, and Belladonna Took’s Accidental Troop of Mercenaries* are legal formations of pledge-siblings, a hobbit family structure usually claimed to increase social class and prestige (as high numbers of pledge-kin confer distinction on a hobbit, being a sort of popularity vote/endorsement that adds greatly to their social power. Incidentally, this is partly why Bilbo was both controversial and successful in his pledge-claim of Frodo; outsiders mistook his “bachelor” status as someone living outside of heteronormativity, while the Shire was bewildered and increasingly annoyed by his rejection of pledge and hearth commitments. By rights Bilbo had too few pledge-kin, and too little parenting experience, to claim rights to an orphan, especially one from Brandybuck hearth; but conversely, his social status was high enough that his belated bid for his very first pledge-son couldn’t reasonably be denied by anybody.)
In short, all of the hobbits enjoyed achieving even larger families on their adventures, legally and without argument or debate. It’s free real estate. If nobody else is going to sibling these losers, we will. (The condensation of so many entanglements at once also legally made Pippin his own father-in-law.)
Gandalf never explained.
* see the post about the Old Took’s “enchanted diamond cufflinks” that obeyed the wearer’s commands; which were probably, given the general state of things, two lost silmarils recovered by his Remarkable Daughters and gifted to him because things stay small and safe in the shire
@elodieunderglass wouldn't that make pippin both denethor's pledge-son-in-law, and (as pledge-brother to the king) probably outrank him?
Only through Boromir while Boromir was alive! Pippin’s familial claim through Boromir technically dissolved on Boromir’s death, as Denethor hadn’t been privy to it, and those bonds rarely stretch to a stranger when the person in the middle has died before introducing them; although Pippin, who was well-brought-up, perfectly and politely rectified the problem at once by simply swearing himself as Denethor’s pledge-son. but through his blood-cousinship to Frodo, who was older than Boromir, his status as the Took double-primarc (don’t ask) and the proximity-enhanced status-doubling effects of having a five-way cousin in Merry, Pippin was demonstrably higher status as a pledge-sibling and was also his own father-in-law and approved of himself. As such, he would have significantly raised Boromir’s social status and marital prospects in the Shire.
Inheritance follows parent-child pledge as the primary consideration, with matrilineal descent as the secondary. Pippin would have been bewildered to gradually understand that Denethor held his two sons in such odd and different standing :-/ hobbits don’t recognise kingship so it would’ve been very upsetting and disappointing to Pippin to understand how Denethor stood in position of sworn-father to a whole city of people without even being slightly fair to his younger hearth-son. Aragorn is demonstrably much better dad-material and therefore had Pippin’s vote. Pippin, by virtue of being an excellent father-in-law to a spectacularly promising young son-in-law, also considered himself a better candidate for king of Gondor than Denethor, by outranking him in Dad Competence - but was too busy by the time he realized this to point this out .
Ironically, the events in which Pippin realized this made Faramir his own hearth-son - so Pippin won in the end and took a great interest in ceremonially approving of Eowyn. Gandalf never explained
I will buy that for a dollar, yup.
It crossed my dash again! The Hobbit Polyamory Post!
I got lost midway through this too, but I am greatly amused by the idea that the conservative Catholic Tolkien, who is also the known master of intricate world-building lore, accidentally created a society that only works if it is routinely polyamorous and 50% gay.
I don't care what anyone says this is canon.
*
simone weil
*
ursula k. leguin

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch • No registration required • HD streaming
Is That Allowed
Boy am i glad that the con has a facebook page so i can post this photo:
getting up from bed tips
getting up from bed cheats
getting up from bed codes
getting up from bed ending explained