Not only is it safer and more legal or whatever, it's not like. That necessary to performatively promote violence at it is necessary to destigmatize certain kinds and get people comfortable with exonerating the act of fighting back. Like you could tell people how to do certain things at your own risk. You can incite all kinds of things at your own risk.
Free will exists. And fighting back of all kinds, including physically is happening more and more.
But I think what's more important to me, is the truth that people who fight back are not people I feel threatened by, in any way, shape, or form.
Because that "harm" is not always reflected inward to a community or to a familial/platonic unit.
Anti-ICE and BLM protesters who employed all tactics, people I know, have never hurt me in my life. I was not unsafe from my mother's hands, specifically, in our altercation with her abuser.
The idea that fighting back is a smoking gun waiting to point back at you is typical.
That distrust of disruptors to normalized abuse is in and of itself, structural and encouraged...
It must be unlearned for change to take root.
More than it is ever safe to condone or incite violence, you need be morally, ethically exonerating certain kinds.
























