It sucks but it makes sense.
I've seen it cited that this was the ending Terry Pratchett had planned, the one that they had brainstormed when considering a sequel to the original book. And whether that meant Crowley and Aziraphale specifically being the ones to sacrifice themselves, I don't know, but I would believe that the end was indeed intended to be a complete reboot of the universe, to be without God, angels, or demons "messing it about," as Adam would say.
Because the thing is, while Crowley and Aziraphale may be why we love Good Omens, their romance was never supposed to be the point, and free will in the Good Omens universe is not as free as you think.
Adam, you may say, already saved the world, thereby preserving free will. A reboot was unnecessary.
But did he? Wasn't it?
The thing about Adam, is that crucially, it's not that he saved the world, it's that he didn't destroy it. Now, he talked about how Heaven and Hell should stop messing with people, but he didn't actually do anything about it. He refused the call. Refused to destroy the world, and refused to make any rules about it either. All the problems with the world were still there.
So, free will:
For the most part, sure, humans in Good Omens have free will. They are free to make whatever choices in their life they wish, for good or bad.
But... only while they're alive. Once a human dies, they're shipped off to Heaven or Hell, then subject to the whims of whatever occult being is assigned to determine their fate. We mostly don't know what that looks like, but we do know they could for instance get turned into a fly, being eaten and digested by a spider, over and over again for the rest of eternity.
Does that really sound like free will to you?
And before you think about saying yes: no actually, they don't always have free will while alive. There are all these angels and demons messing around with them!
Remember Hastur and Ligur bragging about the impure thoughts they put into people's heads? Even Crowley and Aziraphale, retired from official duties and who should really know better, mess with people and the world around them all the time. And I'm not even talking about Maggie and Nina.
They do it casually ('have a change of heart Misty, go see your dad'), without thinking ('move, I want to sit there'), and sometimes without even meaning to.
Look at Whickber Street. When Aziraphale is the primary occult being in residence, the atmosphere of the entire block is absurdly cheery and quaint, a bubble out of time. Then when the area is left to the unconscious influence of a depressed demon sleeping in the alley, everything falls into cartoonish ruin. Every human around them is subject to their moods, whether they realize it or not.
These may be fairly small or subtle things, but it's still a violation.
So yeah, hard disagree on the free will front. True free will could not exist for humans while gods, angels, and demons were still around. To be honest, a reboot of the universe removing these powers was the only real solution.
But what about angels and demons?
Aren't they beings with free will? Why don't they deserve to exist in the new universe?
And here's where it gets really messy.
Because the Good Omens we see in the television show is really quite different from the original book in some subtle, but significant ways.
In the book, Crowley and Aziraphale have a bit less free will than we tend to assume. They each have ingrained impulses to good or evil that they have to consciously resist acting upon.
It's less obvious in Aziraphale's case:
"Aziraphale couldn't resist an opportunity to do good." As a turn of phrase it's easy to gloss by, but it's meant literally.
See a few pages later:
When Crowley starts drowning a duck toward the beginning of the book, he says he was forgetting himself. That is, he was forgetting to resist his demonic impulses.
Angels and demons are not human. That was kind of the book's whole point.
And the book is what the envisioned sequel was based on.
The problem:
Before we got a sequel to the book, Sir Terry Pratchett passed away, and then we got the television series in 2019.
And it was great! It adapted the story faithfully while bringing new depth, development, and brilliant performances to enrich fan favorite characters Crowley and Aziraphale.
And that, of course, is the problem.
(Now, this isn't to say that they weren't great characters with a great dynamic before then. People have seen and shipped the Ineffable Husbands for decades. But you can't deny how the fandom exploded with the TV show, and how much more emotional investment was instilled into them.)
The show humanized them, and shifted the focus of the story away from pure religious satire in order to highlight their relationship.
And this is why it sucks.
What we ended up with was an ending conceived for a setting where the humor and philosophy of it was more important than the characters, where angels and demons were mere game pieces, and freedom for humans from God's meddling was what really mattered.
But that's not the setting the TV series gave us.
And why it especially sucks for fans.
We are here because we love Crowley and Aziraphale. They were the ultimate comfort characters. Immortal beings who had always, and would always love each other. It was accepted as canon that they would get their happily ever after.
So to see their future dissolve into dust... it was devastating.
I don't believe in soulmates (or souls for that matter). The very concept is counter to the premise of a universe free of divine meddling. Asa and Anthony... it's just not the same.
(I have more to say about Crowley and Aziraphale in human AUs, but this is so long already. I will leave that for another post.)
How to look at it now:
As an adaptation created after the death of one its writers, the Good Omens TV show was always a step removed from the work's original intent, and season 2 took even more steps away.
Doubtless, it would have been better if season 3 had been given more time and budget to work with, but it would ultimately have been just as removed from the source. Just as much of a mess, as it attempted to tie a half-formed conclusion onto a work it wasn't meant for.
The sequel to Good Omens was never written.
Anything in the TV show is only as canon as you want it to be.


















