If you actually want to argue with me, please provide links and context for some of your claims, otherwise itâs hard to understand some of your views. I understand itâs not necessary to do it for every case if itâs obvious such as Naruto being discriminated by the village, but if the onus of proof is on you and a user Is asking you to show and explain it, itâd be much appreciated if you could do so. To give some examples: Who is Setsuna Uchiha? Were they even mentioned in the manga or in the databook or in another valid additional source? If so, where exactly? Why did they try to take over the village? Does Setsuna really mean oppressive? Where does it say so?
From my initial search, setsuna only seems to mean âinstant, moment, or junctureâ. Here, a link to demonstrate the meaning:
 https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/%E5%88%B9%E9%82%A3
Then, did the Uchiha clan went against Madara or did they not? Did they support Hashirama as the leader of Konoha or did they not? Did the Uchiha clan want peace or did they not? Did the Uchiha clan forbid the use and teaching of Izanagi or did they not? Did the Uchiha clan punish those who abused Izanagi with Izanami and get them back to the good path or did they not? Did Tobirama unfairly generalise the Uchiha clan or did he not, considering not everyone from the Uchiha clan is able to activate the sharingan (only the elite being able do so) and considering the fact they sealed off the love to avoid/reduce the chance of any possible negative side effects?
Tobirama is being irrational and not right here. The Uchiha clan posed no threat to the village at this time, therefore he has no reason to put them under surveillance and mistrust them. The fact that the Uchiha clan in general did not let their difficult past with the Senju clan prevent them from supporting Hashirama despite the death tolls on both sides and the fact that this did not compel them to become âvengeful hateful terroristsâ when they had the chance to be so during the negotiation with Hashirama actually disprove the unreliability of every Uchiha person and the mistrust against said whole group. They were willing to change!
By the way, you actually havenât bothered to meet the challenge of an argument and address most of the questions/points from this paragraph that Iâve already made in my last reply.
 Next. I assume you wanted to say âinternal conflict was the [insert: least] thing he wantedâ. Yet, even if Tobirama became hokage in the middle of war, it did not stop Tobirama from continuously provoking the Uchiha clan as Hashirama points out, and the accusation was not once rejected. Tobirama also did not refute Orochimaruâs accusations of having caused troubles with his political measures and of having cornered the Uchiha clan, managing to chase them away to the outskirts of the village. Thatâs not an example of generous behaviour towards the Uchiha clan.
Also, your claim indirectly assumes every human acts rationally when that is not always the case as human beings sometimes let their emotions influence their actions.
 Whether valid or not, your accusations against Madara are irrelevant to the fact that you canât generalise a whole group and mistrust them when the Uchiha clan itself went against him, supported Hashirama, sealed off the love, and were willing to change for the betterment of the village despite the death tolls on their side and the Senjuâs side. Blaming Madara is also like blaming Konoha for Sasuke going crazy during the kage summit.
Moreover, the point was not to make Madara seem better or justify the choice when he stopped Hashirama from killing himself. It was, and I apologize if it was poorly worded/implicated in my last reply, to explain that, if Madara only always had bad intentions, he could have get rid of Hashirama during the Uchiha-Senju negotiation in order to do what he always wanted.
 The science of racism was not intended to implicate the Uchiha clan is a raceâI apologize for not being clear enough; rather, it was to discuss the science of racism that affects a social group. Therefore, in the context of societal racism, it is valid seeing how Tobirama constantly mistreated the Uchiha clan as already explained in detail in the third paragraph of this reply, and mistrusted them on the basis of genetics. No other clan received the same treatment from Tobirama as far as I am aware of, and not every Uchiha person gets mad like Shisui. It also doesnât help Tobirama when not many people from the Uchiha clan acquire the Sharingan and when even fewer people activate the mangekyo sharingan. What Tobirama does is judging the whole Uchiha clan by a condition that only affects a few selected people, even going so far as to call a whole group a clan possessed by evil. What about those who do not have the sharingan? Itâs Tobirama jumping to conclusion and generalisation. Therefore, his experiences and/or experiments are flawed/biased.
 As Orochimaru already mentioned, Tobirama did manage to chase the Uchiha clan to the outskirts of the village and was not once met with a refusal. Furthermore, you canât chase it (it being the police headquarter which was only said to be in the same place as the prison). Iâd also like to point out that forcing the Uchiha clan to relocate is a bad thing as it goes against their will. You did not explain why âitâs not a bad thingâ, therefore it is an empty claim.
 How does controlling crime and enforcing laws upon people allow the Uchiha clan to influence politics, which actually means making and changing laws or successfully defending themselves against the forced relocation, when they are removed from the governmental body? Why is the Uchiha clan considered the Senjuâs plaything? Why did the Senju clan came to control everything if the Uchiha had that much power? Why demonstrating the Uchihaâs awareness of what Tobiramaâs really were and coming together as a unit to defend themselves? What did Madara see in Tobirama that his fellow clans men didnât at first? Please, answer these questions.
 Here, I assume you wanted to say âHow is giving Uchiha exclusive control [insert: not] a sign of trust?â. Iâve already explained why he did not trust the Uchiha clan and why he was irrational and wrong (in the first paragraph of this reply). Also, you donât put people under surveillance expecting another Madara to appear if you trust them. You also donât say you never know what theyâre going to do if you trust them.
 The whole âEverything was Madaraâs faultâ, even the future Uchiha massacre, is irrelevant to the discussion as the goal of this debate is whether or not Tobirama was right in how he dealt with the Uchiha clan.