You are nearly 30 years old, no?

REBLOGGABLE CALLOUT. Curio, formerly known as Sucrose and Nil in the past, is somebody who consistently guilt-trips and gets up in people's faces when they block him. He's very recently gone out of his way to demonize people who block it under the guise of "I want to know what I've done wrong!". We were content with leaving the situation be after my run-in long ago with it where he got up all in my face for blocking him since we didn't like how it kept asking for smut interactions under the assumption that it might change, but later it was found out he has been doing this to people non-stop for years, this is repeated behavior that needs to be addressed.

Newsflash, Curio, as people have constantly stressed to you over the years nobody owes you an explanation. Especially when you have this sort of damn attitude when confronted.

This old blog goes over its past behavior in-depth. Summarizing, outside of guilt-tripping and getting in people's faces over blocking him because of its incessant begging for people to engage with its female oc's that it creates little to nothing but sexual content for, it has defended abusers, harassed somebody writing a duplicate muse of its, and overall has a lot of bark but no bite when consequences finally rear their head.

Its current known urls: tridentofoceanus, hub-of-daydreams, fantasyconcrete, violetragnarok, vibescepterofoceanus, fantasycumcrete, shewasthefourth, time-cannot-be-stopped, sour-peach, paradoxicalcurio, unbxlxnced, carmine-crimson, spectacular-solarflare

FULL disclosure that we have now blocked Curio's blogs on here and followcurio. Given how much it twisted us trying to be respectful and accommodate it's pronouns, there's no hope of having a cordial conversation at this point.

US: Proceeds to silently update its pronouns in order to respect it since misgendering is shitty

CURIO:

SPEAKING of, one person came to us pointing an important fact out.

BLOCK evasion is against tumblr TOS. While we don't have faith that tumblr will genuinely follow up on these reports. Someone who was block evaded by Curio showed us how you should report this.

HAPPY basically new year. We're fucking glad that cancelstols is gone, sweet christ on a bike. Objectively speaking, we've seen a lot of bad fucking callouts and mishandling of situations, but that blog took the cake. We frankly would've been happy to reblog a proper Stols callout, we do think a lot of their behavior is shitty, but once again, they did not have any relation to Curio. We tried to stay on-topic blog-wise.

ALSO, Curio.

CURIO. People are allowed to prune gross people out of their communities. It's your own fucking fault that you block evaded people because you thought you were entitled to information. We are not responsible for your or anyone else's growth especially when you insist on staying in communities you've harmed. We don't need to give people second chances and freebees. We wouldn't want to roleplay with you, ever. Feel free to keep talking about your stalker as if any of your followers want to hear that. We are simply here as the consequences to your actions, as we've always said.

IF someone finds this blog and decides to block you because of it, why is that not a net positive. Someone who's already predisposed to not like you avoiding you entirely. But you digress, the person who never had any intention to write with you discarded you like a toy, you say.

HUH. What else is there we can say about this. There's no way to prove who sends anonymous messages to blogs, but the interesting use of the phrase bully and admitting to false reporting people. For the person who has an unhealthy hatred for someone with a three letter name, you sure are using the same tactics she used back then.

JESTA is a stalker. With or without your help, stalker. People are in their full right to block your new accounts on websites, as you can come across a public account in multiple ways and block. It's a different story when you put people on a public blocklist calling them bitches instead of simply leaving the description empty. Especially when most of these people have not engaged with you outside of merely blocking you.

WE did not contact the original owner of fuckhouse privately nor the other parties involved during the initial situation with someone with a three letter name as we saw the fact that they were being public with their rebuttal towards someone who was outspoken about their boundaries as fair game as a fellow callout blog to reprimand. We do not know original fuckhouse personally, none of us were even mutuals with them on the roleplay blog they own.

WE do not see every post in this dinky little callout blog circle. We miss shit and frankly can't be fucked to check up on everyone on the rare occasion we log in. We aren't doom-scrolling these callout blogs especially when the admins who run this blog who have rp accounts, which we'll never share by the by, have everyone involved blocked as we don't want to be involved in any mess. Maybe these anonymous users should take notes.

THIS blog is focused on Curio, not Stols, or anyone else for that matter unless they are enabling Curio's or Curio is engaging with them out of his sealion-ing spite. Regardless of any bias callout blogs may or may not have, we also hold the same critique we have towards how people covered the Shep situation with how the Stols situation is being covered. A chunk of it seems very performative and a lot of the evidence already speaks for itself. It is telling that the current most active Stols archive blog has the url cancelstols and not something akin to blockstols, as if you want to spitefully cancel someone and not to merely inform. The show you people are making out of Stols is not helping your case and only gives stols more room to victimize themselves. Drop a doc, document their behavior, and leave it at that.

YOU cannot prove who sent an anonymous message, which is why we hate anonymous hate even if you want to argue an awful person deserves to get some. People get framed for sending things they didn't. Writing styles do exist but so do millions of writers who have the same subtle typing quirks.

FUCKS sake. We said our piece about the previous situation. Harshly, yes. We went what the fuck is this. We are allowed to air our disappointment when it comes to how situations are handled. Nobody was aware of fuckhouse's at the time current personal situation. The asks sent come across as sealion-ing and trying to poison the well.

NO, we didn't bully anyone. We will stand by that. You can argue this is a bully blog all you want. The only person you can argue we bullied is Curio, but even then, we simply showed his public behavior and commented on why it was bad, and we will start showing it again if he continues to do new and shitty things.

WHEN making a public DNI, bare minimum you don't call them bitches or other derogatory things if other people can see said DNI on such a website. We will not say how to set your boundaries, you are in your full right to have that BlueSky blocklist and have whoever on it.

NO. The victim is allowed to set their boundaries however the fuck they please.

PUBLIC DNI? Great. PUBLIC POST? Okay! JUST TELLING PEOPLE PRIVATELY? Alright!

LET us see, making a situation about a predator being outed after you blindly trusted a callout on a 15 year old... About yourself... And backpedaling on arguably the OG callout's most petty point about the titfucking meme.