Just a snippet from my dissertation......
Because in Fahrenheit 451, the government do not employ scientific conditioning to control the masses, a more disciplinary approach is taken to ensure people will not defy the new policies in place; fearmongering aids the government in ensuring people will not progress through Maslowâs Hierarchy and ultimately society becomes easier to control. It is perhaps due to the methods used in Bradburyâs novel being more comparable to todayâs technological world that makes the text more alarming; Rahmin Bahrani surmised that, âBradbury was warning us about the threat of mass media to reading, about the bombardment of digital sensations that could substitute for critical thinking.â This is something which is not so far out of touch with present reality; perhaps meaning Fahrenheit 451 causes greater anxiety, as the prospects presented in the novel are not a far-stretch from the advancements in entertainment, surveillance and media which can be seen today. Further research regarding progression in society in comparison to changes in human development seem more necessary now than ever. Nevertheless, when considering both chapters, it can clearly be proven that both novels successfully introduce a paradoxical construct which suggests individual happiness, as well as freedom and self- actualization, cannot be heightened or achieved in a totalitarian society. The question remains, whether or not these messages should be considered out of the realms of literature, pertaining to global societies in the 21st century, and should not be dismissed as simply themes in works of fiction.




















