Untitled

once again for the bargain price of $6.66 i will present to you a Top 5 Childhood Misadventures: April Fool’s Edition

ah to be a vengeful Norwegian forest cat, angry woodland guardian, owner of everything i survey

And I, your dumbass brother, the prankster crow

Oh to be the witch who looks after the two

what about that one planet where it rains diamonds?

that sounds incredibly bloody and i can only imagine the amount of paperwork for property damage

What if you poked me in the chest and your finger broke through like you were cracking into a rotted plank of wood and dust came out and I just crumpled into nothing and my spores got into your nose

I would not hang out with you again that's for sure!

Well there you have it!

people who argue over whos the better (gay) fictional wizard, gandalf or dumbledore, are BOTH wrong. its merlin from the sword in the stone (1963).

i see your “this is taako erasure” objections and while i admit hes a pretty strong contender this is a magic grandpa looking wizards ONLY contest. no twinks allowed.

Direct fucking action.

At the time he wasn’t even a sitting MP he was just an asshole who had said rude things about suffragists.

This was my life growing up. The main reason I have a hard time expressing how I feel. If I feel someone is being argumentative, I walk away and send them a text. I express myself very well in word form than verbally.

On the topic of Native oral history not being deemed reliable, but like this is so common for Western Academia to trest Indigenous knowledge this way. And its really weird bc most of our cultures already place such importance on accurate information that when we'd tell stories, sometimes we'd track it down from who told you to who told them all the way back to the original teller. Our cultures valued accurate word for word info so much that often times it was a whole respected job and prestigious title and life's work of people to be historians, knowledge keepers, and storytellers. But academia still treats us as if we're lying or spreading misinfo. Its just really weird for White academia to see Native cultures that put such importance on Oral history, not believe us about our own history, and then still make the shocked pikachu face when Western science or archaeology or history proves what we'd been saying was actually true

Also the idea that oral histories are uniquely susceptible to that kind of revisionism over successive iterations is also just plain old wrong. Written history is just as susceptible to tampering and misinterpretation.