Princess NormalWords

Factions Recap

Lamb

Purpose: Prevent murders.

Win condition: Eliminate all Wolves and the Assassin.

Initial Count: 12

No trial will occur if the win condition is met.

A Lamb will be considered a "traitor" and become a Wolf if they commit murder.

Wolf

Purpose: Murder another participant within a "round" (a 72 hour period starting from the first 6AM after the previous trial) or be executed.

Win condition: Match or outnumber the combined amount of surviving participants from other factions.

Initial Count: 2

Can only kill 2 people per round.

Unlike the other roles, they can identify each other.

Former Lambs who become Wolves will be given the opportunity to identify other Wolves if they survive their victim's trial.

Assassin

Purpose: Get a "target" amongst the Lambs executed in a trial.

Win condition: Make the target, dead or alive, receive the most votes in a trial without having the target vote for themselves.

Initial Count: 1

Can only kill 1 person within the game.

If the target is dead (whether by murder or not), failure to ensure the most votes for them results in execution.

If the target receives the most votes including a vote from the target themselves, the Assassin will become a Lamb.

Cannot change factions using the card shuffler.

It is unclear if the target remains the same throughout the whole game or not.

Joker

Purpose: Emotionally manipulate the other participants.

Win condition: Receive the highest amount of votes in a trial.

Initial Count: 1

Loses if the Lambs or Wolves win.

Cannot commit murder.

Other Notes

There is no tangible evidence of who possesses which roles.

The Lambs, Wolves and Joker can swap roles using the card shuffler. However, swaps can only occur between 2 living participants.

This is not stated in-game but the Lambs' rules imply that they cannot win by directly murdering the remaining members of other factions.

Role Speculation

Some disclaimers before I begin:

A character possessing any role other than Lamb does not necessarily make them black-and-white evil. Depending on their characterization, they could have any reason to conform with their role, whether it be survival or something 'deep'.

I won't be writing any in-depth arguments in favor of candidates for Wolves yet because the clues in favor of certain characters being Wolves are vague in comparison with clues indicating the Joker or the Assassin.

The noodle cup murder attempt was not necessarily performed by a Wolf. I also suspect said attempt wasn't actually intended to murder someone, but rather to start drama because of how poorly planned it was.

Joker

Getting the longest explanation out of the way first. As of the end of Act 2, it's almost certainly Ōkami.

My first reason to believe this is that she acted in an edgy, somewhat antisocial manner in Act 2's trial despite being correct about the culprit's identity and cover-up method as well as not having displayed such behaviour in Act 1 or Act 2 Daily. While it was implied that the loss of Utsuho was the root cause of her behaviour, it also read as though she was deliberately drawing attention to herself.

Dialogue from the trailer "Dilemma", the scene in which she took out the trash with Izumi in Act 2 Daily and her bio suggest that she uses her acting career as a means of achieving temporary states of grandeur. Through the lens of Joker!Ōkami, it can be argued that she perceives the attention-grabbing Joker role as yet another character she can use to achieve megalomania.

Dilemma transcript:

Once upon a time, there was a girl who made a wish upon the stars. A wish that she would keep forever close to her heart. Not as a secret, but as a promise. Though for such a miracle to exist, she must separate her soul from her being. She must be reduced to a puppet. She must live as an empty shell. So, she stepped onto the stage and began her performance. One that would last for an eternity, until the day she fulfils that promise. This was her answer to the "dilemma".

(Note: the lines "She must be reduced to a puppet. She must live as an empty shell." could imply that her behaviour stems from self esteem issues.)

Bin scene:

…and when I'm an actress, I can act it all out so that I'm not simply immersing myself into the characters anymore. It would be as though I am the characters themselves. That's it. Why be one thing when you can be everything? And when you're an actress, you're everything all at once.

Bio:

To her, the stage is where she finds herself, and despite only being a vessel for the characters, it is through acting that she could achieve her dream — of being everything all at once.

Furthermore, Ōkami being the Joker would confirm Tejima's suspicions of the roles being assigned to certain contestants deliberately. The role of Joker primarily revolves around putting on a suspicious façade; it's as though it was tailor made for the Ultimate Actress.

Now to address the elephant in the room: Utsuho's claims about being the Joker. As we should know by now, it was impossible for Utsuho to have possessed the Joker role at the time of his meetup with Kasei because the Joker is not allowed to commit murder. There are two possibilities explaining how Ōkami ended up with the Joker role in spite of Utsuho's actual role:

Utsuho initially was the Joker but switched places with Ōkami, reaching out to her of all people because she was the first contestant to form any bond with him. She lied about not complying with his requests for support to save her own skin.

Utsuho was never the Joker in the first place.

I lean towards Possibility 1 because it strengthens the argument in favor of Joker!Ōkami. Her "dilemma" according to trailer could be related to Utsuho's turmoil over being the Joker, which she would "answer" by switching roles with him, thereby "separating her soul from her being" to save him. As for why she'd do this, a likely factor behind it is the "I can fix him" mindset she displayed in Act 1. Additionally, a statetement I made earlier in this section — "Utsuho was the root cause of her behaviour" — can be recontextualized by Possibility 1. Instead of only referring to her outbursts and self-isolation, it can refer to those behaviours alongside her being further motivated to conform with the Joker role.

Using narrative/meta reasoning, Possibility 1 would also confirm that Utsuho told the truth during his outburst to Kasei, thereby preserving the character development and sincerity of that moment.

One could argue that Possibility 1 contradicts the idea that Joker!Ōkami confirms Tejima's theory. However, this counter-argument doesn't hold up well because the Joker role suits Utsuho's disruptive and deceptive behaviour anyway. I also considered that the mastermind could've anticipated Utsuho and Ōkami's switch but am currently doubtful of the chances of the mastermind playing 4D chess.

Assassin

Assuming they tried to exploit their role this act, Hayasaki is currently the most likely candidate.

The main reason for this take is that similarly to Ōkami, his characterization shifted in Act 2's trial, and the most living characters haven't undergone this sort of change yet (Tejima has also slightly changed but this happened to him in Act 1). In Act 1 and the Daily Life half of Act 2, Hayasaki presented himself as a benevolent individual whose only prominent flaw was his opportunism, and even this was only expressed in a subtle manner through his dynamic with Houjou. Come Act 2's trial, he adopted a more suspicious demeanour and stubbornly targeted Kishibe when circumstantial evidence was stacked up against him. The fact that Hayasaki's behavioural shift happened during the first trial since the extended rules were revealed implies that the shift may have been caused by the rules.

His claims about knowing who the mastermind is don't null this possibility.

Katsuragi would also be an understandable take because of her accusatory behaviour towards Ichinose but it can easily be rebutted using similar reasoning to the Joker!Ōkami and Assassin!Hayasaki takes. Unlike those two, she has exhibited suspicious behaviour since Act 1, meaning she doesn't need a special role in order to act like the Assassin.

Everyone Else/Brief Recap

[0] Izumi: Confirmed Lamb.

[1] Ichinose: From a narrative perspective, it'd make the most sense for the character who is unjustly perceived as a murderer to be a Lamb.

[2] Sawa: No way of telling at this stage.

[3] Hoshino: No way of telling at this stage.

[4] Kasei: Despite undeniably dying a Wolf, he was most likely a Lamb to begin with because his offer to switch roles with Utsuho implied that he had a less difficult role, and out of all the roles, Lambs face the least pressure to sabotage other participants.

[5] Amamiya: No way of telling at this stage.

[6] Utsuho: If possibility 1 is true, he died as a Lamb. Selfish or not, it's unlikely that Okami would want to burden someone she cares for with another difficult role right after freeing him from the Joker role had she started off as a Wolf. If Possibility 2 is true, there would be no way of telling what his real role was.

[7] Katsuragi: No way of telling at this stage. However, it'd be hilarious if the character who was the most gung-ho about prosecuting Ichinose for being an alleged murderer ended up being one of the Wolves.

[8] Houjou: No way of telling at this stage. The murder attempt on her doesn't eliminate the possibility of her being a Wolf because it wasn't necessarily performed by one.

[9] Kishibe: Assuming Hayasaki is the Assassin, then he must be a Lamb.

[10] Watabe: No way of telling at this stage.

[11] Hayasaki: Implied to be the Assassin.

[12] Tejima: No way of telling at this stage. I can imagine some fans would predict that he's a Wolf because of how suspicious his 'leader' façade is but frankly, this would just be too clichéd.

[13] Ōkami: Heavily implied to be the Joker. Also, despite her surname literally meaning wolf, she's unlikely to be one because even her bio itself has acknowledged how much of a blatant red herring it is.

[14] Kurobane: No way of telling at this stage.

[15] Iriyama: No way of telling at this stage.

Zeke

Speculated Crime: Incitement to Violence Actual Crime: Incitement to Violence

Confirmed Parts of my Theory

As stated above, my prediction for the legal term for his crime was correct.

The reason Zeke's victims didn't succeed in performing stunts indeed involves his Ultimate.

Zeke's crime did cause many deaths.

Debunked Parts of my Theory

Zeke's crime segment revealed that he specifically incited new members of the stunt performing industry rather than young boys in general or his fanbase. This slightly changes the meaning of the lemmings in the fairytale; wannabe stunt performers being represented by lemmings is a very simple allegory to the self-destructive nature of the industry. With this in mind, another recurring pattern within the fairytales has emerged; characters sharing a species with each other indicates that they share an Ultimate or a potential Ultimate. Said motif is reinforced by Maiko's fairytale (Yui and other potential Ultimate idols being represented by deer) and Asuga's (Asuga and her employees being represented by frogs and tadpoles alludes to her belief that the circus shares their Ultimate).

Differences between Crime Segment & Fairytale

Zeke's crime segment didn't mention the role his patriarchal beliefs had in influencing his crime, which was hinted at by the fairytale's line about the main lemming believing those who wouldn't jump off cliffs were cowards. However, this doesn't mean it doesn't exist. To remind you once again, Zeke's belief that wannabe stunt performers who can't perform on his level aren't cut out for his line of work parallels his constant statements about people not being "man enough". Furthermore, the lemmings specifically representing up and coming stunt performers does not mean they can't simultaneously represent young boys who conform with patriarchal values.

Zeke's fairytale mentioned nothing of him committing his crime specifically to maintain his status as the most skilled stunt performer, instead framing it as a pure display of his values.

Other

Nothing of his time in boarding school, the first time period in which he incited violence, was mentioned in his crime segment.

Verdict

Expected Verdict: Corrupt Actual Verdict: Worthy of Redemption by a somewhat slim margin (56%)

Disclaimer: This is based solely on my own experiences. This does not pertain to every single voter.

The unpredictability of Zeke's verdict extends to the reasoning behind it. Many people, especially those on Youtube, hand-waved the severity of his crime; some claimed he didn't commit a crime, seemingly refusing to look into any possible legal terms for it; some repeated the mantra of "his crime was being too good at his job"; some cited reasons unrelated to his crime such as Lyra's dependence on him; one of his Youtube apologists even tried to gaslight me into believing his crime didn't quality as incitement to violence 😭. The only part of this I anticipated was his victims being victim blamed.

Another surprise to come from this is his sexuality not impacting his verdict in any way, at least not consciously. This is a departure from Lyra fans joking about voting her as redeemable just so she can have a romance plot with Ismene.

The reasoning for Corrupt, however, mostly matches my predictions and my own reasons to vote him that way. The only exception is a small amount of people pointing out the ties between his crime and sexism because frankly, I have low expectations of the fandom's ability to analyze the crimes in that manner.

Something else of note is Zeke landing a higher Worthy percentage than Taka despite the parallels between both the nature of their crime and their backgrounds. One of the most potent factors behind this is the amount of familiarity the audience has with each character now compared to when Taka's crime was revealed. During the prologue, we only had surface level impressions of the characters, knowledge of a beta version which ended up not being referenced as much as expected and crumbs of subtext that were largely ignored to base our votes on. As a result, many seemed to find themselves under the impression that Taka was one-dimensionally evil and didn't even start to think about the background of his crime. Zeke, on the other hand, had his crime revealed after 2 chapters depicting his character arc and his FTEs dropped, causing fans to be more lenient towards him. The fandom's increase in size is also a major contributing factor but I will address this in further detail at the bottom of the page.

Another factor behind this is that Zeke's crime conveys the heavily normalized "frat boy mindset" (see: DeigenVG's comments in DRATcord) while Taka's crime is deemed taboo in every social circle other than his own. This is analogous to IRL attitudes towards misogyny; old-school misogyny like Taka's (calling women "hoochie mamas" according to DRATcord) is shunned while modern misogyny like Zeke's is ignored or downplayed.

Alora

Speculated Crime: Unethical Animal Experimentation Actual Crime: Unethical Human Experimentation

Confirmed Part of my Theory

Alora did perform some kind of unethical experimentation for Lillith's sake.

Debunked Parts of my Theory

I assumed her victims were animals, not just because of circumstantial hints such as the vat in her cell labelled "Spot" but also because I thought the term "animals" being used to refer to humans in her fairytale would be too clichéd. Instead, they specifically represent the terminally ill, with the symbolic significance of them being represented by "animals" being that they are almost functionally on par with domesticated pets. Perhaps I should've seen this coming, considering that Lyra & Takiko's fairytales also included boomer analogies.

The line about the animal friends becoming 'very different' refers to Alora's patients being given other disorders for research purposes, not them developing physical deformities.

Alora did not defy her employers. In fact, she actually used her following their orders as an excuse.

Differences between Crime Segment & Fairytale

The fairytale didn't mention that the witch's "special friend" was also experimented on nor that said experiments were less painful than the others.

The fairytale didn't allude to Alora lying about testing experimental treatments on her patients.

Alora's crime segment demonizes her by only presenting the torture she subjected her patients to and her lying about intending to treat their illnesses, not mentioning that she also intended to save their lives in the long run by finding immortality (only alluded to as her using "the greater good" as an excuse).

The fairytale disguised the torturous nature of Alora's experiments by referring to them as "magical cues", symbolizing Alora's idealization of it.

The fairytale brings attention to Alora's extreme attachment to life while her crime segment refers to her patients as "disposable" framing her to be less caring in this regard than she really is.

Traitor Theory Reconsideration

The Lillith revelations being starkly different to what was expected provides a seemingly strong counter-argument against the Unwilling Traitor!Alora theory. However, the events of Ch2 Deadly only clear up the nature of Lillith's existence and Alora's initial crime, and the full truth behind the notes in the prison still hasn't been addressed yet. Therefore, the theory hasn't been fully debunked, simply challenged.

Other considerations:

Taking into account the revelations about Lillith's nature, it's now impossible for her to be controlling Mononeko. However, it's not impossible for them to have been created using the same AI. This would explain the parallels between them (e.g. both believing Taka only sought to redeem himself in order to regain Asuga's attention).

Alora made a deal with Emilia in exchange for recordings, presumably to feed her AI bots, as per her interrogation. Knowing that both were initially imprisoned at the same time, this is eyebrow-raising.

Interrogation Notes

These would've been edited into the previous post but I couldn't be bothered to do it back then.

She implies that she believes countless people will suffer in the future if she doesn't perform her experiments. This is a more specific meaning behind the phrase "greater good" than those provided in the fairytale and the crime segment.

She dismisses Lillith's desires in favor of what she thinks is best.

She reveals that her twin's name is Ester. Further backstory parallels between Ester and Lyra are also introduced (running away from home, feeling powerless in the face of her parents).

Verdict

Expected Verdict: Swing Vote Actual Verdict: Corrupt by a very slim margin (50.6%)

Disclaimer: This is based solely on my own experiences. This does not pertain to every single voter.

The public's rationale in favor of Corrupt!Alora more or less matched my expectations of them scrutinizing the surface-level morality of her crime and her egotistical belief that she knows what's best for others. However, the same cannot be said for the Worthy!Alora campaign that primarily ensued on Twitter and in DRATcord. From my observations, said campaign can be summarized as an attentiveness to and sympathy for Alora's background (or, in other words, comparable rationale to the Worthy!Zeke voters) and a belief that Alora's worldview was already challenged by the events of Ch2 Deadly.

Supporters of both sides were even distracted by unrelated circumstances such as Asuga's stab wound, other medical issues and the chances of her earpiece being taken away if she is voted Corrupt. To be frank, not only are unrelated circumstances insufficient reasons to vote for any verdict for any prisoner, but the last of these was outright disproven by her verdict art, which depicts her coping by further withdrawing into a fantasy of her past with Lillith.

Alora's verdict also debunks one aspect of the "Two Sides of the Same Coin" theory (i.e. that prisoners who's crimes were similar to each other would land different verdicts because one seemed more deserving of a Worthy verdict than the other). In this context, Alora and Maiko landing the same verdict indicates a bias against socially awkward women who harm others to help the one person they're closest to and retain trapped in the past after said companion leaves their life. With that being said, it's still worth noting that Alora's Corrupt percentage may be a lot lower because she has a more sensible image than Maiko, which may have been mistaken for genuine sensibility and therefore a larger capacity for change.

Asuga

DISCLAIMER: Some parts of this section have been paraphrased from my Part 2/Updates thread for the Corrupt Asuga Manifesto on Twitter.

Speculated Crimes: Child Labor, Business Fraud, Workplace Manipulation Actual Crimes: Embezzlement, Charity Fraud. Also implicated minors in her crime, though there aren't any specific laws against this under any country's legal code as far as I've researched.

Confirmed Parts of my Theory

Asuga did indeed manipulate minors.

Asuga does have a hidden superiority complex that has gone over most fans' heads.

Asuga does have a need for absolute control that she disguises to others and herself as democracy.

Debunked Parts of my Theory

Instead of simply believing her employees are complicit, she quite literally forced responsibility onto them.

My 1st interpretation of her VA trailer was the correct one (i.e. that it depicted a young Asuga reaffirming her beliefs to herself before committing her first count of fraud).

Instead of representing Asuga telling her employees to lie to their customers, the tadpoles swimming in spirals more likely represents Asuga reaching their hearts and making them idealizing her, bringing it vaguely closer to the biological reason tadpoles swim in spirals. The meaning behind this line has always been difficult to figure out because of its grammatical errors and seeming inconsistency with the rest of Asuga's fairytale.

Differences between Crime Segment & Fairytale

The crime segment omitted the reasons Asuga turned to manipulation in the first place (i.e. to obtain the freedom, familial love and recognition for things other than her race that she never had as a child).

The fairytale merged Asuga's claims about supporting charity and her desire for love into one symbol, obfuscating the exact nature of Asuga's crime. Said obfuscation symbolizes Asuga's rationalization of her formal crime and draws more attention to her "real" crime.

Other Symbolism Updates

Asuga is "little": The crime segment has provided a more specific meaning for the frog being "little" but not the moth than generally feigned naïveté; it represents Asuga's feigned ignorance to the circus' problems. The real Asuga being "little" has also been confirmed by her naïve belief that she will remain united with the circus if they're ever caught. (Note: Directly copied from "The Corrupt Asuga Manifesto; Updates.")

Asuga's employees are tadpoles: Aside from their age and the pseudo-family dynamic they have with Asuga, each party secretly having a different species also represents Asuga's intentions secretly being less pure than the others.

The (self-)image a good person is a light: This works similarly to my previous interpretation (fraternal love); Asuga's desire to be a good person in her own eyes is one of her main aspirations yet it has ironically corrupted her instead. (Note: Directly copied from "The Corrupt Asuga Manifesto; Updates.")

Both Asuga's crime segment and Mononeko's preamble before it were noticeably longer than the other two. This seems to have a symbolic significance because Zeke and Alora's crime segments could've just as easily been padded out by their other crimes (Zeke's incitement beginning during boarding school, the notes around the prison implying Alora murdered someone else during her initial imprisonment) yet they weren't. However, said meaning is ambiguous as of now.

Just like Maiko, Asuga was referred to as "you" instead of "she" or "they" in her crime segment. However, its symbolic meaning is the polar opposite in this context; instead of representing poor self-esteem, it represents delusional self-confidence.

Other

Rippilie mentioned in DRATcord that the method in which Asuga obtained underage employees in the first place technically counts as child abduction. Although it would've been cool if this was mentioned in the crime segment in the first place, this is ultimately a red herring compared to the crimes revealed in her segment.

The line about "punishments" in her Olympian summary still has an ambiguous meaning. The only hint as to what this could be is Mononeko's claim that Asuga believes anyone other than herself taking control of the circus would ruin everything.

Verdict

It isn't officially out yet but based on comments I've seen…

Disclaimer: This is based solely on my own experiences. This does not pertain to every single voter.

Unfortunately, even in spite of the revelations of what she had done to minors, many fans (especially those on Youtube) continued to interpret Asuga's crimes and character alike in superficial and sometimes even completely incorrect ways. Just like with Zeke, many disregarded the severity of her crime and ignored the latter half of it; some found themselves blindly agreeing with Asuga's rationalization of her actions; some even voted her as Worthy based entirely on sympathy post-Takiko's death.

On the other hand, Corrupt voters primarily used the same rationale as myself. Some scrutinized her hypocrisy for bashing Taka's crime despite the bourgeois nature of her own; some pointed out that given Asuga's progressive image, she likely stolen from and damaged the reputations of progressive charities that truly needed the money; some just wanted her moral narcissism to be challenged for once; some Corrupt voters even claimed they were influenced by The Corrupt Asuga Manifesto.

The overwhelming pro-Worthy!Asuga sentiment on social media compared with the divided response to Lyra's crime further proves that fans tend to take characters' images at face value.

Shinku

Recap: Shinku wrote a novel, which he has referred to in narration as "It", containing subtext advocating for neutrality between the Ultimate Talent Program and the Anti-Ultimate Movement, and each side's supporters. What he didn't foresee is that each side would handle the subtext badly, with said backlash leading to an unspecified event that killed members of the AUM including Akari. His actions qualify as Propaganda and (unintentional) Incitement to Violence.

As shown by the CG above, Ch2 Deadly has confirmed that Shinku drove Akari to suicide. Some have been misled to believe this is unrelated to his crime but as evidenced by Zeke's 3rd secret foreshadowing his Incitement to Violence, Akari's suicide is actually most likely to make up a fraction of Shinku's crime. Furthermore, the suicide hints at a more concrete interpretation of the birds' deaths in Shinku's fairytale; they represent AUM members committing mass suicide, perhaps out of hopelessness in the face of Shinku's centrist propaganda.

Speaking of Shinku's propaganda, some DRATcord users believe that his book solely advocated for the UTP. However, I must remind you that the subtext in his fairytale (the fox making a dish for both the birds and the bugs instead of just one) combined with his general people-pleasing behaviour actually indicates that he wrote propaganda in favor of both sides instead.

A few symbolism updates:

Shinku keeping his incineration of Dracul's pin a secret as well as other demonstrations of his tendency to keep things a secret for the sake of people pleasing parallel the fox from the perspectives of both the fairytale and popular symbolic interpretations of foxes (it can be seen as a form of manipulation/cunning).

Takiko's death debatably contributes to the significance of Apollo's lovers facing terrible fates being pointed out by his summary if one interprets that Shinku's treatment of her as a pseudo-Akari makes her qualify as a 'lover'. Said terrible fates can also refer to her reaction to her verdict.

Verdict Prediction: Swing Vote -> Corrupt

Contrary to my expectations, the audience hasn't given his naïveté as much of a pass as Zeke's or Asuga's. In the former's case, this also applies to his misogyny compared with Shinku's, possibly because his is presented in a less serious manner. Taking his parallels with Taka's crime into account, Shinku's inevitable Corrupt verdict also reveals that the fandom has a bias against approval-seeking members of the bourgeois with a tendency to romanticize others' suffering, even when they are products of their environment.

New Summary: Shinku wrote a novel, which he has referred to in narration as "It", containing subtext advocating for neutrality between the Ultimate Talent Program and the Anti-Ultimate Movement, and each side's supporters. What he didn't foresee is that each side would handle the subtext badly, with said backlash leading many AUM members to commit mass suicide, including Akari. His actions qualify as Propaganda and (unintentional) Incitement to Suicide.

Taka

Recap: Taka's portrayal in his crime segment as the sole abusive party at his workplace was disingenuous because his FTEs and subtext revealed that he was manipulated into believing such behaviour was expected from a celebrity.

Entry 7 is a letter from his mother taking place about a year after he moved to Japan during Christmas. This may make it sound irrelevant at first but the letter actually has vague connections to his crime.

Taka's mother mentions many suspicious aspects of Taka's dynamic with his workplace. This includes him being spoiled by his producers, him wearing a new custom suit every day, his divisive reputation, his manager claiming he has many friends and him not speaking to her for a year because he was too busy. However, she turns a blind eye to all of this, suggesting that she is just as naïve and gullible as Taka is. Ms Takahiro's idealization of Taka and his lifestyle combined with the aforementioned personality traits Taka inherited from her explain and enable the mindset behind his crime.

Ismene

Recap: Ismene's crime segment portrayed her crime and mindset in a demonized manner, glossing over the harm her professor had done to her friends and framing her sympathy as a lack of empathy. However, it also omitted another downside to her crime; she specifically got her friends involved as an attempt to traumabond with them.

Entry 8 is an essay written by 13 year old Ismene arguing that Oedipus' character development and its link to the theme of fate is the most important aspect of the play Oedipus the King. Just like Taka's entry, it has subtle allusions to Ismene's characterization and crime.

The essay discusses hamartia (a mistake leading to the downfall of an overconfident hero) and its inherent link to hubris. This parallels Ismene's mistake of getting her friends involved in her crime, which enhanced the moral dubiousness of her actions in spite of her initial good intentions, and her moral superiority complex. Oedipus also shares some personality traits with Ismene (intellectually oriented yet emotionally charged, overconfident) though she's likely unaware of this, especially considering the age she was when she wrote the essay.

To close off, I'm compelled to point out that 13 year old Ismene's grammar and sentence writing skills are atrocious. No wonder her parents had to pay for her Ultimate.

Fu

Recap: Fu has a long history of arranging Ghost Marriages, a Chinese tradition in which 2 dead people are married to prevent their spirits from haunting their families. However, he deviated from tradition by murdering innocent young women to turn them into brides and possibly kept this a secret from his clients. The reason this of all crimes is significant for him is that it's the reason he has an Ultimate.

Nothing new about his crime itself has been revealed but a certain other revelation needs to addressed because contrary to what the game is trying to make us believe, it doesn't change things at all.

Many fans believe Fu's self-outing as the 'mastermind' is 100% a LARP and for once, I completely agree with them. The existence of all this subtext — his fairytale, his Olympian summary, the VA trailer, his FTEs, his interrogation, references in the main game — indicates that he is just like the other prisoners and his verdict will absolutely be voted on.

There is some evidence of the game trying to convince us that he's not just LARPing, though these are almost certainly red herrings. The game has a history of doing this as evidenced by Maiko's suicide attempt being framed as an off-screen death.

His Olympian summary becomes recontextualized if he is indeed the mastermind. The term 'King of the Gods' can refer to the literal role of a mastermind and the line "can avoid justice on account of being emblematic of justice in itself" can be interpreted as him marketing the killing game as a way to achieve justice against crooked Ultimates despite being a crooked Ultimate himself.

Entry 9 not being added to the game files in Ch2 Deadly breaks the pattern of 3 entries being added per release since Ch1 Deadly, with Fu conveniently filling the last slot in the latest trio. The game wants us to see this as a sign that he will never have an entry of his own, but through the lens of LARPer!Fu, this can mean that either the entries are divided into pairs instead of trios from Ch2 Deadly onwards or it'll be released alongside the other 3 remaining entries.

Updates to Analysis Of Fandom

For the past year or so, I've been trying to find a general pattern to define the mindset of the average DR Antebellum fan. However, with the recent growth of the fandom, said search may be futile because a once small fandom's increase in size inevitably begets the superficiality of a mainstream fandom. Said shallow-mindedness has manifested itself through the apparent change in mindset between the Prologue and Ch2 Deadly.

To demonstrate this difference, let's recall Taka's initial fandom backlash. In the live comments of one of Mira's streams, Rippilie claimed they expected Taka to land a Worthy verdict because of his pre-emptive popularity with Betabellum fans. However, this ended up backfiring partially because Lockdown wasn't as mainstream back when his crime was revealed and therefore, shallow mainstream fandom types weren't as rampant in verdict discussions (the other reason, as stated in Zeke's section, is that the subtext implying he simultaneously a perpetrator and victim of psychological abuse was extremely subtle and largely ignored). Had Taka's crime been revealed today, he would've likely scored more Worthy votes and discussions about his sympathetic side in a similar vein to Zeke.

Speaking of Rippilie's perception of fandom culture versus mine, during the first 6 months of releases, they seemed to base their expectations of Lockdown's fandom on their experience with empty-headed, misogynistic mainstream media fans. From my own observations at the time, fans seemed to defy said expectations by assessing the potential circumstances behind Ismene, Mint, Lyra and Takiko's crimes (albeit Youtube fans tended to be a bit more superficial). However, with recent events such as feral Takiko haters flooding the Ch2 Deadly premiere live chat on Youtube and fans (mostly male ones as I've observed) underestimating the severity of Zeke and Asuga's crimes, their fears have started to come true.

More on the relationship between Takiko and fandom culture in the paragraph below. Note that it's not an attempt to disparage the writing of Takiko's scapegoat status within the prison in-universe. What I'm trying to say is that the fandom commentary aspect of her writing would've been more effective if she was widely hated outside of Youtube Live's mental bubble.

Takiko's writing seemed to be an attempt to comment on the "Fandom's Scapegoat" archetype that's common to both Danganronpa (see: @/accirax's Danganronpa archetypes post) and other large fandoms (Skyler White comes to mind). However, even though many fans would be offended by me saying this, this backfired to a degree because Takiko is actually one of the most popular characters on Discord (specifically the second most popular there if we go by the amount of reacts she has in the self-roles channel), Twitter and Tiktok, with her haters being a vocal minority. Even Youtube fans who didn't whinge in the Ch2 Deadly live chat praised her writing. In other words, contrary to what her fans believe, Takiko's reception is more comparable with Tsumiki's than Saionji's. I would argue that Ch2!Shinku and Ch1!Ismene are the real fandom's scapegoats but I digress.

In spite of all of this, the two constants that remains within the Worthy verdicts are the fandom's blind valuation of moralism and their tendency to underestimate the mendaciousness of those who seem more honest than they really are.

New Parallel Pairs

Aside from the parallels used as a basis for the "Two Sides of the Same Coin" theory, a new pattern has emerged from the order of Ch2's crime segments. Although the parallels between these pairs aren't as strong as the main pairs, they can still be used to predict the order of the last 3 segments.

Taka - Zeke: Chauvinistic, attention whoring, dishonest idiots with sensitive sides who physically and mentally abused members of their workplace to maintain their status, yet are still products of their environments.

Mint - Alora: Reserved medicinal workers who have claimed they know what's best for others and poisoned others using false "treatments" in an attempt to help the women they were closest to escape their predicaments, only exacerbating them in the process.

Ismene - Asuga: Self-righteous, ambitious narcissists with strong political views who manipulated their mentally vulnerable comrades into complicity for statements against corrupt authorities in an attempt to form permanent bonds with them after previously having lonely childhoods in which they were raised in competitive environments.

Lyra - Fu: Blatantly untrustworthy, conventionally attractive manipulators who entered shady industries at young ages to escape poverty and deem themselves unable to break free from their vices even after attempting to live normal lives.

Takiko - Dracul: Image-oriented, secretly insecure, somewhat manipulative, caregiving protectors of girl children who enacted vigilante justice against people with poor morals using social media in an attempt to alleviate their insecurities about their strength.

Maiko - Shinku: Self-loathing, lonely, naïve, somewhat bigoted, manipulative people pleasers who spread lies and harmed many young people with a strained relationship with the Ultimate system in an attempt to earn the love of jaded teenage girls they were close with who were also affected by the system.

Personal Judgement Stances as of March 2026