âCombining mutual aid and direct action might seem like common sense, but in todayâs corporatized and professionalized nonprofit world, this model had disappeared almost completely. Community-based nonprofits in the United States today are split into distinct silos, with service provision firmly compartmentalized in one box and direct-action organizing in another.The roots of this split lie in the increasing professionalization of the sector over half a century, driven by no small amount of sexism, classism and racism.â
âDespite political action among social workers of all races, Saul Alinsky is the white man credited with codifying the social action elements. Starting in Chicagoâs Back of the Yards neighborhood in the 1930s, Alinsky eventually became the nationâs most famous âcommunity organizerâ with his approach of starting with local issues in order to rally people to fight for broader political change. He described this approach in his 1971 book Rules for Radicals: âThey organize to get rid of four-legged rats and stop there; we organize to get rid of four-legged rats so we can get on to removing two-legged rats.â Alinsky built the Industrial Areas Foundation (IAF), one of the largest and most powerful organizing networks of the 20th century, uniting churches, ethnic associations, and neighborhood groups in direct-action campaigns. It was an IAF affiliate in Baltimore, for example, that won the first local Living Wage law in 1994, the precursor to todayâs âFight for $15.âThe Alinsky model came to dominate the way activists were trained and organized. It featured highly professionalized, well-paid organizers who kept any radical politics to themselves in the name of people power. The IAF also had a distinctly male culture. Alinsky expected organizers to work around the clock; women, he thought, were too delicate, even if he didnât publicly discourage them from the work.Alinskyâs influential ârulesâ saw servicesâmostly organized by and provided by womenâonly as a means to direct action campaigning. The goal was to deliver âwinnableâ material improvements as well as change the relations of power between everyday people and the institutions that shaped their lives. Described as ânon-ideological,â this model characterized membership-based community organizations for many years. But over time, organizers who were women and people of color have disrupted and changed that norm, arguing that racism, sexism and capitalism would never be challenged under these conditions.â
âBut especially in times when the state dramatically fails to deliver what people need, mutual aid is a powerful way, sometimes even the only way, to help people manage daily life while sustaining their spirits in the struggle for systemic change. Organizing requires courage; courage comes from community. Mutual aid fuels the audacity to demand more because it reinforces that we are not alone in our suffering.â