KIROKAZE
almost home
Mike Driver
Jules of Nature

if i look back, i am lost
macklin celebrini has autism
sheepfilms
Not today Justin
Alisa U Zemlji Chuda
Monterey Bay Aquarium

PR's Tumblrdome

JVL

JBB: An Artblog!
Cosimo Galluzzi

Kiana Khansmith

Kaledo Art
Lint Roller? I Barely Know Her
Xuebing Du
RMH
d e v o n
seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from Iraq
seen from Lithuania

seen from Singapore
seen from Chile
seen from Türkiye
seen from Canada
seen from Brazil
seen from Spain
seen from Poland

seen from United States
seen from Malaysia

seen from Malaysia

seen from Argentina

seen from United States
@bezoarcureforpoison

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch • No registration required • HD streaming
Actually watching this stalking show on Netflix is super illuminating because:
Researchers being quoted are like “mostly these men will keep reoffending and we can say jail time might cure them but um. Unfortunately the data doesn’t support that.”
Absolutely none of the men will own up to having done something wrong. One of the men talks about the trauma he and his wife went through together: he accidentally killed her son with a tractor, got into drugs over the guilt, kept harassing her about wanting to kill her, and then went to her work with a noose in his car screaming he would kill her. Another man stole $100,000 from a woman and then started stalking her because she wouldn’t “listen to his apology”. Another man actually previously killed a girlfriend and the stalking victims testified against him on the stand, because he confided the murder story to her to scare her.
What’s interesting though is they do have one female stalker. She started leaving little voodoo dolls and shit on her husband’s ex-wife’s doorstep and car because she was sending nude photos of the women to her husband. Her story made national news. She was put on probation because she never did anything violent, but part of the terms of the probation was she had no contact whatsoever with her own mother for 8 years. The terms of this woman’s no-contact order with her mother were stricter than the no-contact orders given to men against their victims after they were imprisoned (all of the men either attempt to or continue to stalk their victims from prison). The female stalker did own up to what she did and expressed remorse immediately.
Anyway.
What’s also very interesting is how the legal system has basically legalized saying you’re going to kill someone as long as the person making the threats is a man and the person being threatened is a woman.
A man kept punching out the windows of a woman’s home when she wasn’t there, sent her thousands of texts about being camped outside her home, asked her neighbor about guns at 6 in the morning, memorized her work and gym schedule. Because none of this was “a threat to bodily harm” it was all fine. The stalking victim had to hire an attorney to find other victims he did beat in order to prove he was a real risk to her.
The man was totally aware that as long as she didn’t have his face on videotape while kicking in the windows of her house, he couldn’t be touched. He repeated multiple times that she never had him on tape breaking into her home, therefore it wasn’t him and he shouldn’t be in prison.
Like….
These posts are dishonestly framed and it's gross, tbh.
I’m curious about what’s dishonest and gross about relaying what these men and women stated about their actual, real-life stalking cases.
Was it the part where a man stated that because he wasn’t on tape breaking into her home, he shouldn’t be in jail for trying to break into her home? That he knew that without cameras it would be very hard for a prosecutor to do anything to him? Even though he had also left hundreds of voicemails detailing her daily movements and outfits to let her know he was watching her at all times?
Was it the part where a man stole $100,000 from his employer but kept breaking a restraining order even while in jail because he “just wanted to apologize” to her? And then later gave a fellow inmate a detailed layout of her home to put a hit on her and then the inmate turned him in and the map of her home was accurate?
Or was it the part that the jails these men were housed in let them continue to make phone calls to their victims, while a female stalker was court ordered to not contact her mother because her crime was committed with her mother, and was following the terms of that court order.
Was it the part where the researcher in Episode 1 stated that data doesn’t back that these offenders will stop offending? That rehabilitation doesn’t necessarily work, which was kind of supported by the stalkers themselves who all had multiple victims (except the one woman who was stalking her husband’s ex).
What was disgusting about my framing.
Most verbal harassment and stalking is totally and completely legal. Even when stalkers start to break the law, it’s hard to prove to a jury they’re a physical danger to their victims or to the surrounding public.
But simultaneously, stalking tends to be an excellent harbinger of future violence against that victim - once you’re kicking in the front door of a persons property and leaving her dozens of voicemails a day, there’s a higher likelihood that the stalkers next step is actually breaking into the house and hurting or killing her.
I’m sorry that these cases upset you - they upset me too. But my framing is correct.
RIP to generations of women creatives we’ve lost because their eccentricities got them locked up in insane asylums and corrective religious institutions.
i say this in all seriousness, a great way to resist the broad cultural shift of devaluing curiosity and critical thinking is to play my favorite game, Hey What Is That Thing
you play it while walking around with friends and if you see something and don't know what it is or wonder why its there, you stop and point and say Hey What Is That Thing. and everyone speculates about it. googling it is allowed but preferably after spending several minutes guessing or asking a passerby about it
weird structures, ambiguous signs, unfamiliar car modifications, anything that you can't immediately understand its function. eight times out of ten, someone in the group actually knows, and now you know!
a few examples from me and my friends the past few weeks: "why is there a piece of plywood sticking out of that pond in a way that looks intentional?" (its a ramp so squirrels that fall in to the pond can climb out) • "my boss keeps insisting i take a vacation of nine days or more, thats so specific" (you work at a bank, banks make employees take vacation in long chunks so if youre stealing or committing fraud, itll be more obvious) • "why does this brick wall have random wooden blocks in it" (theres actually several reasons why this could be but we asked and it was so you could nail stuff to the wall) • "most of these old factories we drive past have tinted windows, was that just for style?" (fun fact the factory owners realized that blue light keeps people awake, much like screen light does now, so they tinted the windows blue to keep workers alert and make them work longer hours)
been playing this game for a long time and ive learned (and taught) a fuckton about zoning laws, local history, utilities (did you know you can just go to your local water treatment plant and ask for a tour and if they have a spare intern theyll just give you a tour!!!) and a whole lot of fun trivia. and now suddenly you're paying more attention when youre walking around, thinking about the reasons behind every design choice in the place you live that used to just be background noise. and it fuckin rules.

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch • No registration required • HD streaming
if theres one thing that really pissed me off from my 3 years of architecture i took in high school it's learning about how we used to have all these little techniques to maximize or minimize heat or warmth and now we just merrily abandoned all those to have the same copypaste style buildings everywhere that are often INCREDIBLY unoptimized to the local weather and climate so we can just throw more money at our heating and cooling bills
The fact that a wealthy, white mother-of-two in California with access to excellent prenatal and birth care, acting as a surrogate for another family in the safest, cleanest, least coercive of all possible surrogacy arrangements, died this week while giving birth really underscores the surrogacy thoughts I've been having recently. Should you be ethically willing or legally able to compel another woman to risk death at worst and major lifetime health consequences at best just so you can have a child that is biologically related to you?
Here’s an article about it.
She died of an amniotic fluid embolism, which is rare but very deadly.
This post gives another example of a surrogate dying and includes this disturbing information:
An article online incorrectly states “the risks of being a surrogate mother are the same as for every pregnancy.” This is not true. Recent studies have shown that surrogate pregnancies are different and are high-risk. Studies show that women pregnant with donor eggs (as in gestational surrogacy) have a more than three-fold risk of developing pregnancy induced hypertension and pre-eclampsia.
W/ the greater risk of hypertension/pre-eclampsia, why? Or rather, is it known why?
Because in a normal pregnancy the baby is >50% related to the mother. In surrogacy, an unrelated egg is used, which means entirely foreign biological material in the woman's body.
Pregnancy is basically a 9 month-long battle between the woman and the embryo; a "healthy" full-term pregnancy can only happen if, essentially, the women's body doesn't realize that the embryo is there, because if it does it will attack it with the woman's immune system as a "foreign body." This is the main reason the placenta exists, to shield the embryo from the woman's immune system (along with nutrient absorption obviously).
The closer the embryo is to the woman, the less likely an immune response will be triggered; this applies to gestational surrogacy, but also relates to things like the sex of the embryo and the embryo's blood type. So, the more genetically different an embryo is from its mother, the higher the overall risk of triggering an immune response, which then increases the likelihood of a smorgasbord of complications given the strain that an immune response causes both the mother and the embryo.
this is just personal observation, but all the people I know who had surrogates (which is only 3 so who really knows), their babies are so so sick all the time. Like months premature, weeks in NICU, multiple hospital stays in infancy, now constantly sick as toddlers, can’t keep weight on, lowest percentiles of height / weight, etc etc. Literally every one of them.
and maybe it’s just a coincidence but maybe you aren’t supposed to implant your eggs in another woman and assume her body will grow a healthy baby for you? not to even talk about what it does to an infant to be forcibly removed from their mother at birth….
This should be obvious to anyone who knows anything about pregnancy/women's healthcare. But because even doctors seem to think that pregnancy is when a woman just incubates a man's offspring for a few months, providing nothing but a chamber in which the baby can grow, they treat it as if it makes no difference where the embryo came from.
Surrogacy is this horrible intersection between modern medicine + capitalism and an almost medieval understanding of pregnancy. Worst of both worlds.
today i took the worst photo of a loon one can possibly take while remaining identifiably a loon
loon :)
i painted my loon :)
The fact that men are so quick to equate abortion and murder really shows how little difference they see between female body and a public space.
requested by anonymous:
RATING: RELIABLE
The above is from this article from The Guardian. The images are from MYA Network. The caption on their website reads:
Source: ‘When a sperm and egg get together, the body creates tissue in order to support the developing pregnancy. Here are photos of that tissue from 5-9 week pregnancies. This is called the gestational sac, and it’s like the “house” for the pregnancy. Inside this sac there are cells that have the potential to become a fetus but there is no visible embryo at this stage. We rinsed off the blood and menstrual lining (decidua) for these photographs.’
The published images sparked a lot of debate, leading to the story being picked up by other news outlets. For example:
Source: ‘Last week, the Guardian published images of pregnancy tissue after abortions in the first 10 weeks of pregnancy. The small size and appearance of the tissue were shocking to many. We have all absorbed, knowingly and unknowingly, the pervasive anti-abortion narrative that a pregnancy resembles a tiny baby starting in the earliest weeks. Though an early embryo can be seen under the magnification of ultrasound, it can take months for it to be perceptible to the naked eye.’
Source: ‘People have responded in disbelief, citing the (magnified) images they’ve seen on ultrasounds. […] ”Think of the illustrations on pregnancy and medical websites. The Mayo Clinic, one of the preeminent medical organizations in the country, shows week-by-week illustrations of embryonic and fetal development without any context of scale, like the rulers in the MYA photos.’
As stated in the article, whilst people talk about a ‘heartbeat’ at 6 weeks, there is no heart developed at this stage - only a group of cells that will become part of the heart.
Source: ‘But what exactly do we mean when we talk about a “fetal heartbeat” at six weeks of pregnancy? Although some people might picture a heart-shaped organ beating inside a fetus, this is not the case. Rather, at six weeks of pregnancy, an ultrasound can detect “a little flutter in the area that will become the future heart of the baby,” said Dr. Saima Aftab, medical director of the Fetal Care Center at Nicklaus Children’s Hospital in Miami. This flutter happens because the group of cells that will become the future “pacemaker” of the heart gain the capacity to fire electrical signals, she said.’
It should also be noted that the images show an embryo, not a fetus, until the 9th week.
Source: ‘In human pregnancies, a baby-to-be isn’t considered a fetus until the 9th week after conception, or week 11 after your last menstrual period (LMP).’
The co-founders of the MYA Network responded in a New York Times article.
Source: ‘Many people, even those who support abortion rights, did not believe the photos were accurate. Some insisted we had deliberately removed the embryos before taking the photos. The images weren’t consistent with those often seen in embryological textbooks, magnified on ultrasounds or used in anti-abortion propaganda; these enlarged images are not what you see with the naked eye after an abortion. A Stanford gynecologic pathologist has validated our photos, but many people could not believe the pictures were presented unaltered.

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch • No registration required • HD streaming
reading my first 1000+ page book in years 😊 i can still read voraciously like i did when i was a child. thanks for always being so pro-reading
ok i’m a bit pissed off so here goes some Real Facts tm
1. if you have a vagina you are female (which is sex)
2. if you have a penis you are male (which is sex)
3. sexual orientation is based on sex
4. so does sexual opression
5. trans women are not female
6. trans men are not male
7. trans women can’t experience more or less of sexual opression than women because they are not female
8. lesbians are attracted to females
9. if you are attracted to males you are not a lesbian
10. reminder: trans women are not females
11. gender is a social construct
12. people are not attracted to social constructs
13. people are attracted to sex (which is biological reality)
that’s all, pass it on
The popularity of the "incompetent stupid piece of shit husband and competent wife who loves him anyways" trope in media is a psyop to make women believe its normal to settle for an incompetent stupid piece of shit husband

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch • No registration required • HD streaming
What does it take to make African mythology real? Everything we had. Over 70% of our Kickstarter Backers came from Tumblr. Thank you. Now it's yours.
ZAIROO is out now.