Stargate Atlantis S2 E15 “the Tower” is not a very good episode which is a crying shame because “our cloak-and-dagger, Game of Thrones esque political quasi-medieval succession crisis situation predicated on magitech which seems to function on the divine right of kings got knocked off track when a bunch of clueless aliens from a totally different genre bumbled into the royal court” is actually an excellent episode premise. Even just swapping the focus and shooting the episode from the POV of the locals would have improved it significantly.
Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
✓ Live Streaming✓ Interactive Chat✓ Private Shows✓ HD Quality✓ Free Actions
Free to watch • No registration required • HD streaming
I think thinking about the Jewish Thing. It’s hard to describe but am yisrael chai is..we are a tribe (people have used ‘ethnoreligion’ and it’s right and not) and like…that is honestly the case (atheist jews are totally normal! like my grandfather kept Jewish practice and was absolutely an atheist and still jewish) and we are not a proselytising people At All.
Which makes me think about Josh and Toby in The West Wing and the ways that Josh probably experienced antisemitism in ways that were almost cloaked/hidden/a subtle build up that you don’t always even see until you look back.
(I know, I absolutely know he got so so many threats actually. There are actually from memory not that many Jewish people even in Democratic Administrations and also like, I’m speaking as a Mizrahi Jewish Woman (when we were expelled from our homeland my family went to Persia and Syria) but absolutely Not Considered White. Maybe passing/maybe not but the shooters absolutely would not. The pervasive antisemitism from all sides).
And the ways that Toby both has it more overtly and defends Josh and also has some weird feelings about Josh being to ‘pass’ (except he can’t which g-d post Rosslyn) and he can’t and MY FEELS.
Even though everything goes wrong, I love the wedding at the beginning of "Balance of Terror" as this glimpse at just people living their lives in this intensely social/communal environment (more than most later ST tbh) and how pleased they all are to be part of it. But of course, especially for my fave!
So, we get a bit of last-minute wedding prep:
I love that people mostly just wear their uniforms and normal hairstyles, not civilian clothes (both ponytails and elaborate coiffures are entirely normal on the TOS Enterprise!). The vibe is that this is a special but not exceptional event. We'll see in a moment that even the bride just wears her uniform with a floofy head piece.
(It's actually not all that common in TOS to see Federation characters in civilian clothes other than disguises, and definitely not just generic upscale modern dress with jeans or whatever when we do see it—Theiss pretty much always combines the contemporary with something more fancifully futuristic, like with T'Pring's silver upon silver outfit in "Amok Time" and T'Pau's matriarch get-up, Nancy Hedford's very cool 60s-but-also-not lime green patterned deal in "Metamorphosis," High Commissioner Ferris's asymmetrical suit in "The Galileo Seven" echoed in Ambassador Fox's lace-lined get-up in "A Taste of Armageddon," Kirk's snazzy fitted pink-black-white geometric pantsuit for proving his identity in Spock's court martial in "Turnabout Intruder," Areel Shaw's and Uhura's vibrant robes, and of course, the entire diplomatic corps and Amanda's dramatic, layered Vulcan gowns in "Journey to Babel.")
Anyway, I also enjoy that they've clearly just dredged up or figured out how to manufacture a few things for touches like adding the red carpet for the wedding aisle and candle to the religion room here.
I also like that there's a religion room tbh. Like so much of the bland "we've evolved beyond that" utopianism of the Federation, the "we've evolved beyond the need for religion" bro atheism is largely projected back onto TOS from the sanded-down iterations of the 80s versions. But TOS is explicit that the crew is composed of religious people and atheists. It's far from flawless about this (Roddenberry actively repressed specific mention of non-Christian religious practice from the writers, particularly Judaism), but I find the image of a future filled with people from different cultures and religions, including but not restricted to atheism, thrown casually together without problems much more optimistic than one in which everyone just agrees about everything.
A few moments later, when Kirk is beginning the ceremony, this is emphasized btw:
We are gathered here today with you, Angela Martine, and you, Robert Tomlinson, in the sight of your fellows, in accordance with our laws and our many beliefs
I'm also a fan of the open flame and elaborate candle situation! I choose to believe it wasn't just replicated like gemstones or picked up on leave but there's just a hobbyist chandler squad on the ship.
Anyway: Scotty even sets up a camera to record the wedding and transmit it to every viewing screen on the ship and excitedly informs Kirk about this Engineering For Love accomplishment. Also it looks like they got some plants from the arboretum to liven things up <3
Kirk hurries in to officiate, and I'm charmed by his understated happiness about it even with the Romulan situation in the background. He doesn't need to put on a whole theatrical deal here. He just really likes weddings and is happy to be part of one. People should ask him to officiate more of them at random starbases or whatever, honestly, it'd make his day.
Also, adorably, both the bride and groom are nervous. Kirk gives Tomlinson a reassuring little smile and Scotty, who is escorting Angela Martine down the aisle, gives her a big one:
Bones in the background is beaming at the ceremony, and there's a late-arriving blueshirt who seems like she might have been Martine's maid of honor or something who's visibly very happy for her:
Janice Rand, I think, is both happy for the couple but has very complicated feelings about being right next to Kirk at a literal marriage ceremony. I suspect that Kirk, on the other hand, is way too caught up on Wedding Cloud 9 to even be thinking about his own situation beyond Romulan problems:
Janice: I should just be happy for my fellow crew members but my complex and intense feelings for the man 3 inches from me rn who has been very clear that ethically he cannot have a romance with anyone on this ship even though Starfleet has no regulations about it makes all this. a lot.
Kirk: WEDDING!!!!!!!!!!!!
So after a moment of kneeling, our stressed bride and groom get up and look at each other and remember why they're doing all this: they're madly in love is why!
And then Kirk gets to give the speech at the wedding of his children crew members, he's in full Captain Mom mode:
I remember when you came onboard as just these little ensigns! And now you're getting married!!!!
Update on my original post's aside about getting such an intense sense of Janice radiating all kinds of layers of feeling and UST while Kirk seems mostly in full excited mother of the groom mode:
Janice: I should just be happy for my fellow crew members but my complex and intense feelings for the man 3 inches from me rn who has been very clear that ethically he cannot have a romance with anyone on this ship even though Starfleet has no regulations about it makes all this. a lot.
Kirk: WEDDING!!!!!!!!!!!!
So, I was reading Grace Lee Whitney's memoir (which took some doing to acquire from Powell's, for reasons irrelevant to this post), and there's definitely a lot going on (understatement). But she has this section where she sums up her general sense/experience of the other actors, and it's kind of hilarious because she's like "oh, Leonard was so kind then and later" or "Jimmy Doohan was so funny" and then she's like ... "I didn't fuck Bill, okay? I was so strong. For my art."
The answer is no, we were never romantically involved with each other. And yet—
I was always aware of a tremendous attraction between us that was never consummated. Part of that attraction has to do with the roles we played. [...O]ur job as actors was to become James Kirk and Janice Rand, to feel what they felt, to behave as they behaved, to immerse ourselves in their identities.
I remember that Bill used to stand behind me in certain scenes, and he would hold me, and the back of my body would be absolutely on fire for him! That's lust, not love. I was very attracted to him. He was very charismatic, very sexy [...] He was so powerful—and I don't simply mean that he is physically powerful, but he also possesses a very strong personality. He was my leading man[...]
I believe I resisted my attraction for Bill in part because I was always in character. Yeoman Rand wouldn't hop into bed with Captain Kirk, so neither would I. On some level, I'm sure I intuitively knew that if I became involved off-screen with Bill, it would ruin the on-screen chemistry between Kirk and Rand. I cared about the character too much to do that.
I thought Captain Kirk was the most exciting character I had ever seen on the screen [...] I absolutely loved his bold, swashbuckling manner. His incredible energy was perfect for the larger-than-life captain of the U.S.S. Enterprise—and when nuance was needed [...] Bill could always supply that as well...
I remember him as being very sad and withdrawn during those early weeks of shooting. His father was dying at the time[...] The wonder of William Shatner is that, with so much going on in his off-screen life, he was so engaging and commanding onscreen.
I literally said "girl" out loud when I finished reading, to a woman who died in her 80s over ten years ago. >_>
Rodney McKay is a deeply closeted gay man madly in love with John Sheppard but he's so deep in the closet even to himself that he tells himself it's hero worship. But whenever John is involved with a woman he gets so jealous he practically explodes.
John Sheppard is an asexual man who's never heard the word asexual and thinks he's supposed to like women but the inside of his mind is probably just like a game of Sudoku and a turkey sandwich. He legitimately thinks of Rodney as his bestie and would be perfectly happy just bickering beside him for the rest of his life.
This leads to all their interactions with women being--
Rodney: *in an anxiety falsetto* 'I love women ooh yes women are so sexy women just love those women,' his crush on Sam Carter not withstanding, I legitimately think he has a crush on her but also she's a twink so it's fine.
Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
✓ Live Streaming✓ Interactive Chat✓ Private Shows✓ HD Quality✓ Free Actions
Free to watch • No registration required • HD streaming
Apart from being a groundbreaking feminist classic, The Tenant of Wildfell Hall feels like a series of increasingly dire reddit Am I The Asshole posts. It's from the 1840s, but it records human behaviour and relationship dynamics with a detail and clarity that feels modern, especially to our therapy-speak-laden "Who TF Did I Marry"-core present.
"He has promised he shall restrain himself on his visit to London and we shall not see him suffer such self-abuse as before."
(Three months later)
"He is back from London and even worse than he was last time." (Describes him clobbering a servant for dropping a dish when he was hung over)
I see a lot of folks defending their vitriolic repugnance towards toddlers with cries of "but my sensory needs!" as if children are not also in possession of sensory needs. As if you, an adult here on Tumblr.com, do not have the capability and resources to learn the skills or acquire aids for coping with competing access needs. Or, y'know, just the option to leave, the way children most often do not.
You're holding an actual child to higher standards than you hold yourself, but it's the child that should be removed from public and community spaces. For your comfort.
"you don't owe anyone anything" You are a tar pit. Speak for yourself. I personally owe the cafe employees my dishes put away and my friends a listening ear and small scared insects a cup and a gentle trip outside. Hyperindividualism is a rancid infection borne of capitalism and willfully misinterpreted therapyspeak and I will defy it by continuing to be kind regardless of whether or not it benefits me personally
This cozy sweater was worn by Geraldine McEwan as Jane Marple in the 2004 𝑨𝒈𝒂𝒕𝒉𝒂 𝑪𝒉𝒓𝒊𝒔𝒕𝒊𝒆’𝒔 𝑴𝒂𝒓𝒑𝒍𝒆 episode 𝑻𝒉𝒆 𝑴𝒖𝒓𝒅𝒆𝒓 𝒂𝒕 𝒕𝒉𝒆 𝑽𝒊𝒄𝒂𝒓𝒂𝒈𝒆. In 2010, the piece appeared again on Jennifer Ehle as Myrtle Logue in 𝑻𝒉𝒆 𝑲𝒊𝒏𝒈’𝒔 𝑺𝒑𝒆𝒆𝒄𝒉.
Find out who else wore this sweater at Bit.ly/PostEd031
Great. Able-bodied people can make an entire store trip in 15 minutes. Bully for them.
I live on the outskirts of a city -- technically within the city limits, but a somewhat suburban neighborhood (common in a lot of parts of my city). I have a grocery store a block from me. I cannot walk to it or home from it. There are no good sidewalks between me and it, either, and the roads all have slopes that would be dangerous for me if I took my scooter. Furthermore, even if I had flat, even sidewalks between me and it (which most parts of my city, even the downtown areas, don't have; it's a hilly place), the most often I could shop would be twice a week, and then only some weeks. I don't have the spoons to do it every day. It takes a lot longer than 15 minutes, and it is exhausting. And the basket on my scooter is not built to carry groceries home.
City living can be great for a lot of people! That's fantastic! But city living is not going to make it possible for everybody to go car-free.
It's possible to have multiple people's needs met in a 15-minute-city. It's possible to have a walkable city that also caters to disabled people's needs.
Wellington and it's inner suburbs are pretty close to a 15 minute, walkable city. We also have dairies in most places (corner stores) that cover things like the basics plus snacks and drinks etc.
But I can't walk anywhere anymore due to chronic pain. I can however get groceries delivered in either large or small amounts. It should be cheaper than it is, but it's not too rough for me - a fortnightly shop gets delivered to my door for $9. A small top-up delivery is $7 or less. I do think if your big grocery shop is over a certain amount they should deliver it to you for free - they're making enough profits off us to factor that small amount in.
If I had a mobility scooter, I could get to my local dairy, down to my doctor's surgery, to my local library, to a cinema, to most things I need.
The only thing I struggle with is getting to and from work, but I work on the far side of town to where I live, and it's up in a very hilly suburb. I can't walk to the bus stop near home any more, but I can get to a bus stop in town in a rideshare for less than $10, and then catch a bus that drops me at the door of my workplace. I catch the bus down into town after work and then rideshare home for around $6-$7. I'm lucky enough to be able to afford this cost because I have a free bus pass. To catch the bus without a bus pass from the closest stop to my house would cost me $$60-$70 per week.
To use rideshare to and from an accessible bus stop usually costs me another $20ish per week on top of what paying for the bus would cost, maximum. I'm good at playing discount codes between apps, sometimes I can get my weekly transport spend under $70. I looked at using a disability driving service but it was more than double the price of rideshare apps, even with a Total Mobility card!
It's not impossible for 15 minute cities to be accessible. Low public transport costs, low delivery costs, accessible footpaths and crossings, affordable rideshare costs, plenty of drop off/pick up spots in busy areas, public toilets, etc etc are all doable. It just needs the community to demand it and those in power to put it into place.
Whenever you're discussing something, especially things like government policy and city design that impact a lot of people, it's important to have everybody on the same page as to what we're actually talking about. Because there's a big disconnect here.
A "walkable city" does not mean "walking is the only option." It means that walking is a viable mode of transportation in that city. It means that walking is an option. It means a city designed in such a way that if you don't want to own a car, you don't have to. A "car free" city doesn't mean that nobody owns a car, it means that for most people it's not a requirement to live in that city.
In a walkable city, there are still a fuckton of cars. Amsterdam is one of the most walkable cities in the world, and there are a lot of cars. But the city is designed such that while you can get just about anywhere with a car, it's still safe and easy and convenient for most people to walk, bike, or take public transit. Lots of people don't own cars; lots of people do (and will continue to do so!) and use them to get around in the city.
While there are a handful of extremists who want cars to go away completely, that's not what most people are talking about when they talk about wanting walkable cities or 15-minute cities or what have you. We just want cities where it is possible to go about most or all of your daily activities without needing a personal automobile. Not cities where everyone has to be car-free, just cities where it's an option. Cars and trucks and vans still existing within the city and being used both by individuals and businesses is not a sign that a city fails at being walkable, or a 15-minute-city.
Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
✓ Live Streaming✓ Interactive Chat✓ Private Shows✓ HD Quality✓ Free Actions
Free to watch • No registration required • HD streaming
The way the "Free Palestine" movement pissed away the ceasefire hating Jews when they could have been pushing for disarming and rebuilding will never not be a travesty and hopefully it will not yet be a tragedy. But, regardless, it is more of the seemingly endless proof of the lack of care and regard for Gazans even from those who claim to be 'on their side', feh.
10 months, limping into an 11th, all wasted. Almost a year. Way more than a moment, so very many many moments frittered away with hate instead of used for compassion and care.
I'll never forget the time I said people who want to help should donate to Anera rather than tumblr scambots, and propals actually went around telling people not to BECAUSE IT MUST BE A ZIONIST SCAM.
I'd bet cash I, a filthy Jew Zionist, have donated more money to Palestinian causes than all the Tumblr propals combined, and I haven't even been able to afford that much.
Overlap between antiblackness and antisemitism in fandoms:
- Jewish-coding and Black-coding ignored and erased e.g., character’s experiences are intentional allegory for Jewishness or Blackness, but people insist it’s about queerness instead.
- The desire to see Black and Jewish characters humbled. This is usually in retaliation for some perceived wrong due to a white character. Gets worse if said characters are successful in their fields, then it’s portrayed as “punching up”.
- Ethnic features being erased (skin lightened, curly hair straightened, slimmer noses ect).
- Discussions about antiblack/antisemitic tropes in fandom spaces dismissed because “real bigotry is more important” (“real bigotry” is then never discussed).
- When the main characters are Black/Jewish and yet the fandom won’t stop talking about that fucking white guy.
- Black/Jewish characters made out to be mean, usually depicted as bullying the poor white character (bonus if the “agonisers” are men).
- Infantilisation specific to non-white characters.
#Major parallels with Angry Black Woman/Domineering Jewish Mother stereotypes#Because western society sees Black and Jewish womanhood as unfeminine#It's also interesting how they see Black and Jewish masculinity with Black men being hyper-masculinised and Jewish men being feminised#Both are cast as less-than-human foils to the shining white knights of mainstream western masculinity#with those interpretations being the justification for how and why these communities can be an underclass in their society#anti-Blackness#antisemitism (via tikkunolamorgtfo)
"- Black/Jewish characters made out to be mean, usually depicted as bullying the poor white character (bonus if the “agonisers” are men). "
The Star Wars fandom regarding Mace Windu and anakin
On the dubject, we also should talk about how fandom has more fire for Black/Jewish characters who are heroes and who are just generally right about everything than fandom has for white characters who are canonical fascists, mass murders, etc
oh no no NO no no I am sorry my dear @thebirdtm you are NOT underselling one of the most seminal pieces of television of my entire childhood like that on MY watch.
"How is claiming they drowned a Hilux possibly underselling it" GREAT question.
To start with a little disclaimer, Top Gear's Hilux did not start off, as in the video above, in pristine condition. It started off with nigh-on 300k kms (for you yankees, that's about 8.4 million Boeing 737 wingspans) and a condition to match.
And it's only once careless driving around town yielded zilch in given shits...
(look, I found a local newspaper picturing it being driven around!)
...that they decided to drown it.
Now, the underselling part: if you told me that they drowned a pickup the first place my mind would go to would be "driving it through a river a bit too deep for it, perhaps as deep as its height, until it stalls and then tugging it back out.
You will concede that's rather different from tying it down on the seashore with the second highest tide in the world...
...and leaving it there until it engulfs the whole truck...
...only for the ropes to snap...
...and for the truck to be lost to the tides for FIVE HOURS.
(and for those wondering, yes, just as promised, well within an hour and the mandatory limits of basic tools and no spare parts, up the mechanic made the thing fire and away the presenter drove it - I must imagine doing a number on his clothes in the process.)
Oh also I would have mentioned the caravan.
Or at least the wrecking ball.
But hey, at least the fire was mentioned.
Still, I feel it's criminal to leave out how they celebrated it surviving all it did: by parking it at the top of a 23 story building for all to see! :)
Wait NO-
Well, that was uncalled for.
Given what it survived, it deserved to rest in a museum instead of being unceremoniously cleared out with the other chunks of public housing that buried it.
Or at least, given that buried it wasn't...
...to be tumbled down from the rubble utop which it sat...
...and be fueled up.
"be fueled up", pfft, what for?, I hear you say. And you are right.
Look at that thing, you say.
Let's be serious now, however pretty of a story it would be that's not a truck that will do anything remotely in the ballpark of firing up, let alone running.
And again, you are right.
The battery was disconnected.
Sorted that, tho
"You can't be serious." Oh darling I sure can!
"Well the presenters can't then" no no, I assure you, it lived. Go see it for yourself! It's at the National Motor Museum in Beaulieau, England!
I grew up watching Top Gear and it shaped me in many ways. My adoration of old Toyota Hiluxes is one of them.
In terms of establishing the fundamental aesthetic of the 1990s strand of cinematic cyberpunk, the 1993 Super Mario Bros. adaptation is probably up there with Johnny Mnemonic and Lawnmower Man influence-wise, as much as we all hate to admit it.
Welcome to the "learned from this post that the first major live-action feature film adaptation of a pre-existing video game franchise was a dystopian cyberpunk AU of Super Mario Bros. for some inexplicable reason" club.
Are you kidding? This film was the vanguard; it may have tanked in theatres, but the novelty of it led to a number of bandwagon-jumping projects in following years. After Super Mario Bros. dropped in 1993, we had Double Dragon and the Jean-Claude Van Damme Street Fighter in 1994, then Paul W S Anderson's Mortal Kombat in 1995; the unexpected commercial success of the latter film was reportedly the deciding factor when Angelina Jolie accepted the lead role in Tomb Raider a few years later, which in turn kicked off the second wave of major live-action video game adaptations in the early 2000s that gave us the Resident Evil films
Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
✓ Live Streaming✓ Interactive Chat✓ Private Shows✓ HD Quality✓ Free Actions
Free to watch • No registration required • HD streaming
"this thing is so rare, if you put everyone it affects on an island it would be the 20th most populated country in the world, more than the UK, more than South Korea, and more than Canada AND Australia AND Tunisia all put together. we can literally forget about it that's not many people"
it's about autism and EDS and intersex variations and about trans people and also it's about golden blood and it's about blind people, it's about screaming all day long and howling the night out that you exist even if you're not everywhere, you're small but your heart beats and your lungs pump air and they want you forgotten in the pages of a book they won't read
Otter's Rock @beatrice-otter - Tumblr Blog | Tumlook