PAUL JAISINI FAN STELLY RICHIE

Summer-diary-stelly-riesling-paul-jaisini by Kenneth Smith Via Flickr: www.artlimited.net/28738/art/image-summer-diary/en/692597

gif paint by Kenneth Smith

Muse-Series-Stelly'17-Paul-Jaisini by Kenneth Smith

summer-diary-stelly-r-2014-19-paul-jaisini-muse http://www.artlimited.net/28738/art/image-summer-diary-by-stelly/en/11710739 by Kenneth Smith Via Flickr: Questions from various angles Paul Jaisini claims he paints invisible paintings. Is it Anti-Realism? Is it Visual Emancipation? Is it full Visual Emancipation from any kind of visual image? Paints Invisible Paintings - Is it just a figure of speech? Is it Utopian? Is it driven by unconscious and irrational thus in accordance to Sigmund the invisible painting is not rationally autonomous? How could it be verified and where or what is the invisible painting’s by Paul Jaisini evidence? Paul Jaisini wants to cultivate Invisible Style. It surely is a style that is not a lucid one, for clarity would expose the lack of content. Is there any content? Is it an attack on the ‘metaphysics of presence’? What is the definition if there is certain definitions to apply to Invisible Painting? Can it be informative about contemporary culture? Is Paul Jaisini with Invisible Paintings promotes Postmodern Obscurantism - deliberately preventing (fully if it is in fact the invisible painting) the facts or the full details of Invisible Painting’s matter from becoming known? (Obscurantism: deliberately restricting knowledge—opposition to the spread of knowledge, a policy of withholding knowledge from thepublic; and, deliberate obscurity—an abstruse style (as in literature and art) characterized by deliberate vagueness.) Leo Strauss also was criticized for proposing the notion of “esoteric” meanings to ancient texts, recondite knowledge inaccessible to the “ordinary” intellect. Kant employed technical terms that were not commonly understood. Schopenhauer contended that post-Kantian philosophers such as Fichte, Schelling, and Hegel deliberately mimicked Kant’s way of writing. “Because of his style which was obscure, Kant was properly understood by exceedingly few. And it is as if all the philosophical writers, who since Kant had had some success, had devoted themselves to writing still more unintelligibly than Kant. This was bound to succeed!”[ Does Paul Jaisini wants to be understood on any level or he wants no understanding of his Invisible Paintings? Can there be any level of understanding if not seeing the Invisible Paintings?

gleitzeit cat mix by Kenneth Smith