This is such an underhanded rhetorical move frankly. you can recognize that trans men face unique issues among men, you can recognize that transphobia affects trans men! You do not however need a conceptualization of bigotry that implicates the existences of a cross section between transphobia and "androphobia", because masculinity is privileged over femininity, and men will always be privileged over women of a similar class! Black men experience racism, but they are not discriminated against for being men, and within their own communities they are privileged over Black women because men as a class prioritize themselves over women for their own benefit. "Transandrophobia" is just the newest in a long line of attempts to parrot and refocus feminist languages and frameworks around men, which only makes any logical sense if you believe that women hold some privileges over men (which is not how patriarchy is structured!) Literally all people are asking you to do is realize that you have privilege over women in the same community as you, and if you cannot realize that then you are an active danger to all women.
Of course we acknowledge that trans men face unique issues and that transphobia affects trans men, but no matter how many times we do that will never be enough because "transandrophobia" is the antithesis of transmisogyny. "no trans person has gendered privilege over another" is the only logical conclusion under a theory which asserts that transmisogyny is (somehow) perfectly balanced by an equal but opposite social force. The blog in your screenshot has made this exact argument many times.
We can treat this as the idealist nonsense it is by appealing to our material base (eg, the inter-trans pay gap and other various discrepancies). Anyone who responds to this basic line of analysis with accusations of "oppression olympics" or "infighting" is only revealing their complete disinterest in the actual lives of transfeminized subjects under current regimes (patriarchy, capitalism, colonialism, etc).
