its not that shows weren't cancelled and cancelled viciously in the past... (people only remember the exemplary 6-7 season shows bc of syndication) but shows didn't take 2 years to make ten episodes with the cancellation decision being final 1 week after the season releases in 1 day or like 1 month.
Shows had yearlong seasons released contemporaneously and normally a mid season check-in. So if things were going really bad, there was usually some time to turn things around before the final cancellation, or half a season (like 10 eps) to wrap up storylines.
Midseason cancellation was rare, and i think the way shows are cancelled nowadays feels like that because seasons are short and decisions are made AFTER the writers, actors, directors have no time to course correct but also before audiences can work their magic.
so shows felt braver making longer, slower plotlines. Audiences weren't as fearful to grow attached. Because even if the show was cancelled early, things would probably be wrapped up.
I know laying down track while a show was airing was stressful for everyone, but this model is too. Can there be a middle ground where a show has time to build an audience and reserve and episode or two for wrap ups without being a hectic schedule for everyone and companies aren't exceeding their budgets either?
Dunno. I think even the worst show deserves a chance to have the writer write an ending.
I think what it is happening with tv shows is, sadly, a reflection of how market economy and business have changed. There is no more long term planning, no one wants to accept risks or to lose money in the beginning. People want their money and they want them fast.
There are tv shows that became very popular during their 2/3 season. Now it's no possible anymore. There is also the problem that if a show has more seasons you actually have to pay the people involved in it which is something big corporations don't want to do.
And there's also the problem of promotion. Corporations (everywhere) don't want to spend money over it. Hell, they think that having an underpaid intern post on social counts as advertisement. Which is insane.
You can't have a show like wot, for example, which has a high budget, and do nothing to promote it.
What the hell?
The economics of streaming are also completely out of whack compared to the economics of terrestrial/cable tv. The reason you had shows with 22 episodes and 7 seasons was because the real goal was getting it to syndication, so it was more viable to churn out a show that might not be performing excellently to hit the magic number which let you sell it to other networks and rake in the cash forever on reruns. (You also had similar incentives with dvd boxsets)
With streaming there just isn't that incentive bc well,people can rewatch it forever immediately.
studios actually want to prevent syndication, because artists get more royalties in those events, so they preemptively cancel shows and make seasons shorter.
But they could benefit from syndication -- e.g. there could be streaming aggregators for people who only want sci fi shows to not subscribe to 10 different services and profit that way. they are just not very creative business people. They run an unprofitable business and have no ideas to correct it.
















