AnTi-HeGeMoN

The lone German who refused to give Hitler the Nazi salute...  

“One man against a world power! - standing alone - like many today.”

Sons of Liberty Academy and the rise of the anti-hegemon.

The rise of the anti-hegemon

After a 34-year career at the United Nations, where he had reached Assistant Secretary-General level,[2] Denis Halliday resigned in 1998 over the Iraq sanctions, characterizing them as "genocide". 

He subsequently gave the following explanation of his decision to resign:

“I often have to explain why I resigned from the United Nations after a 30 year career, why I took on the all powerful states of the UN Security Council; and why after five years I continue to serve the well being of the people of Iraq. In reality there was no choice, and there remains no choice. You all would have done the same had you been occupying my seat as head of the UN Humanitarian Program in Iraq.

I was driven to resignation because I refused to continue to take Security Council orders, the same Security Council that had imposed and sustained genocidal sanctions on the innocent of Iraq. I did not want to be complicit. I wanted to be free to speak out publicly about this crime.

And above all, my innate sense of justice was and still is outraged by the violence that UN sanctions have brought upon, and continues to bring upon, the lives of children, families – the extended families, the loved ones of Iraq. There is no justification for killing the young people of Iraq, not the aged, not the sick, not the rich, not the poor.

“This is the 4th year that Anonymous is launching cyber attacks on Israel in response to the “crimes in the Palestinian territories” committed by Israel. This #opIsrael attack is launched just before “Yom HaShoah”, Holocaust Remembrance Day on April 16. Anonymous group has shared following details of today’s cyber attack...”

Yet another example of how the Anglo-American alliance is profiting from their involvement in areas that do not concern them.

This video is so true. Guys please stop turning a blind eye to this. We've seen it countless times already with the CIA's relationship with Saddam Hussain which eventually led to an Anglo-American invasion on the basis that Iraq had Weapons of Mass Destruction, with the U.S sponsorship of Al-Queda and now with this so-called 'ISIS'; the west instigating and perpetuating instability (both politically and economically) as a means by which to impose their cultural ideologies*. When will the western world stop waging these unnecessary wars?

Gemalto presents the findings of its investigations into the alleged hacking of SIM card encryption keys by Britain's Government Communications Headquarters (GCHQ) and the U.S. National Security Agency (NSA)

​​​​The investigation into the intrusion methods described in the document and the sophisticated attacks that Gemalto detected in 2010 and 2011 give us reasonable grounds to believe that an operation by NSA and GCHQ probably happened

The attacks against Gemalto only breached its office networks and could not have resulted in a massive theft of SIM encryption keys

The operation aimed to intercept the encryption keys as they were exchanged between mobile operators and their suppliers globally. By 2010, Gemalto had already widely deployed a secure transfer system with its customers and only rare exceptions to this scheme could have led to theft

In the case of an eventual key theft, the intelligence services would only be able to spy on communications on second generation 2G mobile networks. 3G and 4G networks are not vulnerable to this type of attack

None of our other products were impacted by this attack

The best counter-measures to these type of attacks are the systematic encryption of data when stored and in transit, the use of the latest SIM cards and customized algorithms for each operator

Arrow’s Theorem Proves No Voting System is Perfect

One of the central issues in the theory of voting is described by Arrow’s Impossibility Theorem, which states roughly that no reasonably consistent and fair voting system can result in sensible results.

Named after Nobel Prize-winning economist Kenneth Arrow, the theorem starts by establishing a set of reasonable conditions on voting -- that is, on the method of aggregating individuals’ preferences into group preferences.

These conditions can lead to nonsensical group decisions, or manifestly undemocratic decision-making. As political scientists Ken Shepsle and Mark Bonchek put it in their book, Analyzing Politics, “The group is either dominated by a single distinguished member or has intransitive preferences.” For this reason, the theorem is sometimes known as the “dictator theorem.”

Understanding Arrow’s Theorem starts with understanding what economists and political scientists mean by “intransitive preferences.”

Preferences are known as “transitive” if they can be put in a sensible order. For instance, if you like apples best, then oranges, then bananas least, that means you prefer apples to oranges and to bananas, and oranges to bananas. If instead your fruit preferences cannot be put in best-to-least order -- you prefer apples to oranges and oranges to bananas, but prefer bananas to apples -- your preferences are known as “cyclic” or “intransitive.”