I already talked about the fandom’s views Mike and Will’s characters in this post, but can we please talk more about how some people (*cough* Bottom!Will truthers *cough*) see Will? Because the way certain so-called fans view him is honestly very telling tbh
Now, here’s the thing: I am not addressing the people who just do their own thing and don’t bother anyone. I am addressing the people who see Will in a certain way and harass anyone who dares to see him in another light.
Because why oh why do some of you insist that Will Byers is canonically feminine? Is it because he’s quiet? Sensitive? Likes art? Was at one point in time the shortest in the party? Was the one being saved for the first two seasons? Is that what equates to being canonically feminine. If so, then some of you really need to reevaluate yourself because chief… that’s lowkey misogynistic.
Why do some of you get so damn pissed when someone doesn’t see Will as this uwu wilting flower who’s hyperfeminine and a sub bottom who can’t tie his own damn shoelaces? Why do some of you get so mad when someone says that Will has muscles (he does, I really don’t care what the costume department said about padding or whatever) and that actually, he’s just as masculine as the rest of the boys in the party? Why do NEED the only gay boy in the show to be a feminine wuss? Why do you NEED him to forever stay a damsel in distress for the rest of his life? Why do you think quiet, sensitive, and artistic are all automatically feminine traits? Why do you insist that Will is a sub bottom and that he would never top? Why do you insist on calling Will a “final girl” and a “gothic heroine”? (Which are tropes reserved for women, not your favorite white boy) Why do you get mad when someone headcanons Mike as a bottom or gnc or androgynous? Why do you get mad when people envision Mike also exploring his sexuality and gender identity?
Is it because you automatically assume that being gay means being feminine and that there’s only one way a character can be gay? Is it because you refuse to see the only canon gay character as anything other than a walking stereotype? Is it because you refuse to engage with a gay ship without adding stereotypical straight roles where one boy is “the man” and the other is “the woman”? Is it because adding homophobic, misogynistic, and heteronormative tropes onto a gay ship makes it easier to absorb for you?
Idk man, sounds like homophobia, heteronormativity, and misogyny rolled all into one
And for anyone who’s gonna start shit: yes, I am aware that bottom!Mike truthers also sometimes rely on gay stereotypes. No, we are not exempt from this. But you know what Bottom!Mike truthers (and Mike fans in general) don’t do?
Coddle the shit out of Mike and treat him like a damn two year old















