Returning to my note-taking episode 3 rewatch exactly at Hal giving Thaisha a tour of the Hollowed Round immediately after episode 29 is wild. Hal really says, "But in the past they used this place, we know, this place was to grapple with who we were, and today we'll use it to figure out who we are and who we will be." And it's prompting me, not to a new thought, but to engage a little more deeply with an idea that I've been pushing to the side.
I've been fascinated by the way this campaign is engaging with the weight of history. The Shaper's lingering impact on the world, the generational trauma of the orcs, the "old path" and "circle of ancients" as powerful druidic concepts, so many of our protagonists being veterans and most veterans of a failed revolution at that, Yanessa's bitterness at the Shaper's War taking her house's power, fueling much of the Candescent Creed. Those are just the top of my head examples. History isn't just background in Araman, it is an active force in the decisions our characters make and the values they hold. It even shows up in the structure of a campaign. Flashbacks aren't foreign to actual play. Lots of DMs use them. But Campaign 4 has expanded and emphasized them. They are the entirety of scenes during the cold open. Sometimes characters roll during them as if the outcome is not pre-determined!
And yet, largely what the campaign seems to be saying about history so far is "we have to find ways to move forward and move on." Not cruelly, not forgetting. There is a strong desire to remember and honor the past. Kother'ai was all about honoring Vokjan and the historic struggle of the orcs. But Hal didn't put on the play for Vokjan. He put it on for the people of Dol-Makjar today, to help them "figure out who they are and will be." Thaisha, an adherent of the Old Path and member of the Circle of Ancients, has spent the campaign saying to herself, and now to other druids, "I don't think the past is going to save us."
Yanessa as a villain fits very explicitly in this idea. She rages at her family's lost station is actually striking. Yanessa says of the creed, "Now, we couldn't call it Tansul, because of everything that happened, but the Light could come back." She doesn't miss Tansul, not at all, she declares him a false god in private as much as in public. But the only future she can imagine for House Halovar is a restoration of the past. And the only future she can imagine for Araman is one where nothing actually changes: "They can have their revolution, they can say that mortals will stand where the gods once did, but nobody really fucking believes that."
On a related note, I said in response to an ask a few weeks ago that I wasn't that enthusiastic about significant chunks of Thimble and Julien's character arcs so far, in part because revenge isn't very interesting to me. Which remains true of my personal taste. However, I spoke too quickly and too harshly when I said I didn't see how it fit into the wider themes of the story. It fits here! In one of the most central themes. Revenge arcs are a personal version of interrogating the weight of history vs the need to move on. Grief arcs in general are. (And striking in a different way to start a story with a lot to say about history with the death of someone beloved.) But revenge acts out that individual's clinging to history beyond the scope of their own life.
I feel like I've meandered through this post without reaching a strong conclusion. Which, in my defense, it's hard to reach strong conclusions on anything when we're still on Chapter 1 of a story. The point is this. I've thought a lot about and been very intrigued by the weight of history in this campaign. But I do think I need to pay more attention to what the story is doing with the weight. And so far, it seems to be arguing in favor of shrugging it off. Not throwing it away or forgetting it. But not allowing yourself to be crushed beneath it either


















