Klisz

Now take this logic and apply it to things like ADHD, autism, clinical depression, and other less visible/divergent disabilities. You cannot think your way out of feeling.

like that's how you know when men say they "can't find" the clit that shit is on purpose and they just don't want to interact with it. like to me that was just proof. if someone's clit is big enough that men cannot plausibly argue they "can't find" it, then they literally try to cover it up so they can pretend it doesn't exist.

intersexualized people often get their clits/penises cut off when assigned "female" because to be "female" is to be sexually satisfying to men, and the ideological construction of men around "the phallus" is such that making sure men's clits are always bigger than women's has escalated to the point men want to imagine women don't even have them. they will cause the person genital injury and often a lifetime of painful sex with no ability to orgasm, as an infant, just to reduce the possibility that a man remembers that he is the same species as "women" and this is all just assignment at birth.

wouldn't want someone taught to define his identity as a "man" around his penis (taught to attribute his social power to it, taught to view it as a physical manifestation of biodestiny, taught to understand it as a symbol of his blameless inheritance of physical superiority & societal reward that he has no responsibility or even ability to reject) to experience a weird emotion upon realizing that women also have them.

wouldn't want to prompt anyone to question the sexgender naturalization project that is sexology. too dangerous. we'd rather mutilate bodies with clitorises too small to be ideal penises, and too large to allow men to forget they exist on everyone.

and like ever since this intersexualization project began, in pop science (or sex ed or wherever educational information about genitals is being prepared for a general audience) clitorises are presented as this purely theoretical body part that ~no one~ knows much about.

Found the clip I was remembering. Kat Blaque used this clip in a video trying to discuss transmisogynoir with cis Black women. Hearing TS Madison recount this experience really made me think of every time men want to ignore women's penises/clits, want to make a big deal out of a clit/penis being "too big" or too much like his own. Unfortunately NeNe is too transmisogynistic for this to occur to her, because cis women (just like the cis men) are overwhelmingly invested in this idea that the social class of "man" is actually a bio-destiny stored in phallic flesh.

Transmisogyny, intersexism, misogyny, patriarchy--they are inseparable systems. you cannot oppose misogyny meaningfully without contending with the literal structures of sexgender assignment as means to naturalize patriarchy.

This photo is obviously ai. Look at the man bending over, he's way to far to be whispering in his ear, he's not even looking at him!

Lied and said he was non-verbal

Lied and said he was incapable of communication

Lied and said he had not gotten the surgery of his own accord

Lied and said his "guardians decided [he] was trans"

Got MGT to call a procedure done on a consenting adult "criminal" just because he had cerebral palsy

Mass reported his video and his account, which he ran, until facebook terminated his account for "child exploitation" despite it being his account, him being an adult, and him not being exploited

Ableism and transphobia are inseperable. Just like ableism was used to prop up bigotry throughout history, now it is being used to deny transgender people bodily autonomy the same way it is used to deny disabled people bodily autonomy. It's not a coincidence that so much of the rights transphobic rhetoric is focused on labelling us as "mentally ill". They don't think any disabled people, let alone mentally ill people should have independence or liberation.