Stepping outta my lane a bit here but the longer I live on this bitch of an earth the more fervently I sympathize with all the historians saying that strictly speaking, nobody in 1500 or whenever was gay (or for that matter straight).
Like obviously it's fine to use more imprecise terms in casual conversation. And I do also get why it can come off as hairsplitting pedantry, but imo understanding this illuminates some extremely important things about not just the social construction of sexuality but the social construction of power in general
Straightness, masculinity, and whiteness all function exactly the same way, in that they are highly conditional categories defined only in opposition to something (ie, you can't ever really be securely straight or masculine or white; you can only be not-queered, not-feminized, not-othered. yet). In this essay I will













