Untitled

The Greater Manchester Police (GMP) has long been a significant force in one of the UK's largest metropolitan areas. However, its reputation has been marred by persistent allegations of corruption, selective enforcement of the law, and a protective Professional Standards Department (PSD). This article delves into the accusations against GMP, examining how these issues contribute to a broader perception of the police operating with impunity, akin to a dictatorial regime.A History of Corruption AllegationsGMP has faced numerous allegations of corruption over the years. These claims range from individual officers engaging in corrupt practices to systemic issues within the force that allow such behaviour to thrive. Some of the most serious accusations include: - Bribery and Corruption: Officers allegedly accepting bribes in exchange for favourable treatment or to ignore certain criminal activities. - Misuse of Resources: Resources being diverted for personal gain or to benefit associates of officers within the force. - Cover-Ups: Instances where misconduct by officers is concealed to protect the reputation of the force or individuals within it.Selective Enforcement and Abuse of PowerOne of the most significant concerns regarding GMP is the selective enforcement of laws. This practice undermines the principle of impartial justice and erodes public trust in law enforcement. Examples include: - Targeted Investigations: GMP has been accused of prioritising investigations based on personal biases or external pressures, rather than on the severity or public interest of the crimes. This can result in certain groups or individuals being unfairly targeted while others are ignored. - Neglect of Serious Crimes: Reports suggest that serious crimes, including violent and sexual offences, are sometimes not pursued rigorously if the victims are from marginalised communities or if the perpetrators have connections within the force. - Use of Intimidation: There have been allegations of GMP officers using their power to intimidate and silence critics, including whistleblowers within the force and members of the public who raise concerns about police behaviour.The Role of the Professional Standards Department (PSD)The PSD is supposed to act as an internal watchdog, ensuring that officers adhere to ethical standards and that misconduct is appropriately addressed. However, in the case of GMP, the PSD has been criticised for: - Lack of Impartiality: The PSD is often seen as protecting officers rather than holding them accountable. This can involve downplaying the severity of misconduct, delaying investigations, or outright dismissing valid complaints. - Inadequate Oversight: There is a perception that the PSD lacks the independence necessary to effectively oversee and discipline officers. This lack of oversight can foster a culture of impunity within the force. - Retaliation Against Whistleblowers: Officers who attempt to expose wrongdoing within GMP often face retaliation, including career setbacks, harassment, and other forms of retribution. This discourages others from coming forward and perpetuates a cycle of silence and corruption.Comparisons to a Dictatorial RegimeThe combination of corruption, selective enforcement, and a protective PSD has led some critics to compare GMP's operations to those of a dictatorship. Key characteristics of this comparison include: - Lack of Accountability: Like a dictatorship, GMP is perceived as operating without sufficient checks and balances, allowing officers to act with impunity. - Suppression of Dissent: Efforts to silence critics and whistleblowers echo the tactics of authoritarian regimes that seek to maintain control by stifling opposition. - Arbitrary Use of Power: The selective enforcement of laws and targeted investigations contribute to a sense of arbitrariness and unfairness, akin to the capricious use of power in a dictatorship.Steps Towards ReformAddressing these issues requires comprehensive reform aimed at restoring integrity and public trust in GMP. Potential steps include: - Independent Oversight: Establishing truly independent bodies to oversee GMP and investigate allegations of misconduct can help ensure impartiality and accountability. - Enhanced Transparency: Greater transparency in police operations, including the publication of investigation outcomes and disciplinary actions, can help rebuild public trust. - Whistleblower Protections: Implementing robust protections for whistleblowers within the force can encourage the reporting of misconduct and help dismantle the culture of silence. - Community Engagement: Building stronger relationships with the communities served by GMP, including regular dialogue and collaboration, can improve trust and ensure policing priorities align with public needs.ConclusionThe Greater Manchester Police faces significant challenges in overcoming a legacy of corruption, selective enforcement, and inadequate internal oversight. By implementing meaningful reforms and fostering a culture of transparency and accountability, GMP can work towards restoring its reputation and ensuring it serves the public with integrity and fairness.

Zayna has been seeking justice for over two years. Her Twitter account is @ImanZayna with the title, Seeking Justice.She has campaigned for years trying to get Greater Manchester Police to release the footage that she says will prove that she was RAPED while in police custody.In a one-in-a-million chance, the 2 hours of footage out of 10's of thousands of hours of footage where Zayna was raped happens to have got corrupted, says Assistant Chief Constable Terry Woods.Not only that, it took TWO years and a dedicated campaign to get the police to even bother to speak.GMP has, in fact turned a blind eye to Zayna, probably because she is female. They probably thought, "This woman has no chance of taking us on"Andy Burnham, the Mayor and Crime Commissioner, is almost certainly in his last year in this post, after he lied on TV saying, he had just become aware of this allegation, yet, Zayna has proven that Andy Burnham was aware over two years ago when Andy Burnham turned a blind eye to the raped brown girl!F*ck You GMP, we are not buying it, and we are NOT accepting it.If GMP cannot retain evidence of rape by one of your own officers in custody with state-of-the-art CCTV, then the entire GMP force must be disassembled and rebuilt.There must be GMP officers who know what went on that evening. Each one of you is as bad as the rapist. Speak out, you shit houses.https://youtu.be/EurRkYqOdyw

After almost two years of trying to seek accountability for an allegation of rape in the custody of Greater Manchester police leading to a media frenzy on social media, Sky News reported on the story of Zayna Iman, who says she was raped in police custody. This provoked Mayor Andy Burnham to make a public response.In his response, Andy Burnham lied, saying he had only just been made aware of this issue.Listen to is lies on Sky News Andy Burnham is a LIAR Zayna, who waived her right to anonymity, has campaigned for years and approached Andy Burnham on several occasions by email and Social Media. Andy Burnham has, up to now, ignored her.Here is the proof, Zayna contacted the Mayor in 2021 and received this response. Without any help from Andy Burnham, Zayna's story has reached main some major platforms. Andy Burnham has failed to become involved, turning a blind eye to rape in police custody, and now has the balls to LIE on mainstream media about it to avoid facing criticism.Andy Burnham needs to stand down, he is not fir for purpose!Nick Buckley MBE, who is standing as an independent candidate for the position of Mayor, has already interviewed Zayna and promised his support.If you want to Support Nick becoming Mayor, visit his campaign page here.

In a bizarre email from Detective Chief Inspector Michael Sansbury of West Midlands CID, DCI Sansbury has (so far) refused to investigate a report of Malicious Communications by a known criminal, Darren Hogan.DCI Sansbury appeared to be acting more as legal representation for Hogan, offering varied excuses and defences for Hogan without pursuing all (or any) reasonable lines of enquiry.It may be considered unusual for such a senior ranking officer, a Detective Chief Inspector, to be dealing with a crime report of Malicious Communications, raising suspicions why this is being kept away from typical police ranks such as a PC or Sergeant who would more likely arrange an interview to gather evidence.DCI Sansbury went on to confirm that Darren Hogan has recently been charged with Harassment and Stalking and strangely used this as a means to defend Hogan for his persistent online abuse of a teenage girl. ... I read it as him referring to himself as being the one who was recently charged with stalking and harassment which is true(my emphasis) There is no ambiguity in the above comment from DCI Sansbury confirming the serious offences against Hogan is true. Darren Hogan also stands accused of unlawfully accessing images of a teenage girl from when she was 14-15 years old and distributing them where they were then used on a horrific website, intentionally mixing them amongst sickening adult porn images and making disgraceful comments about the young teen and her father.DI Sansbury's solution to such offences is to cover your eyes and do not look. He has advised the victim to block the offender and not visit what he publishes. He does not consider it worthy of stopping offenders (such as Hogan) and thinks the answer is just to ignore them spreading harm.West Midlands police previously took no action against Hogan, leaving the female victim to fend for herself.So, by the same logic, if someone was to create a malicious website about DI Michael Sansbury with images of him and malicious accusations against him. Maybe, horrifically labelling him a paedophile, or alternatively, if someone was knowingly spreading false information about DI Sansbury by email, would he still come to the same conclusions?So far, the young female has been successful in bringing an application for a private prosecution against Darren Hogan. Hogan, of Comet Drive, Wolverhampton, has been summoned to face criminal charges in the Liverpool Magistrates Court in September 2023.

The Multi-agency safeguarding hub (MASH) report from Bury Social Services was obtained by a Subject Access Request (SAR).These are the reports released by Bury Social Services. The male who the suspect makes the malicious and false allegations against is called John (not his real name) redaction to protect the identities of the innocent parties.And this is the email from DI Andy Wright confirming the anonymous call was from the suspect.Now, you might think that is all,.. you are wrong. The suspect, in her malicious call, stated that ‘having looked into his background’, John ‘has been arrested for possessing images of teenage girls being found on his phone’ and in a further call, the suspect stated John ‘has a history of indecent images of teenage girls’. Supt Kernain (whose LinkedIn profile shows he has been a police officer for over 25 years) made it clear that he was calling a special meeting to plan an investigation. He tasked PC Millie Howarth to investigate the offence committed by the suspect and ensured John that PC Howarth would be in touch with him.PC Howarth confirmed she would call John the next day to take (yet another) statement. Now, bearing in mind that: The MASH report confirms that the caller was called back for further info (showing they had a contact number) Dear Mr xxxFollowing an initial assessment conducted by the Professional Standards Branch it was determined that the matter, having been recorded ,was suitable to be dealt with in a reasonable and proportionate manner, otherwise than by investigation had called Social Services to say you were a paedophile and as a result your friend had a visit from a social worker expressing concerns.These were CRI/KK/000xxxx/23 and CRI/KK/000xxxx/23.Social Services have their own requirements to fact check and assess information. Although they have received an anonymous contact, it is for them to check the validity and devise a suitable course of action. I cannot speak for them. I have checked with Social Services and the call is confirmed anonymous. Therefore, we have no immediate lines of enquiry., and so this information has been passed to Lancashire Constabulary.

lured Lyrico was just 17 years old when he died five days after he was savagely knifed. would be happy to have captured his killers, but you may be wrong. In a recent exclusive article released on the UK Corrupt Police website, we released the contents of a vile

In a recent crime report, Sgt dufus 5033 Powell said that it wasn't a crime to post Malicious Communications on Facebook, and he refused to record the criminal offence.The offender, George Vella of Bedfordshire, who is on notice of civil action regarding the malicious post he made, went on to goad the victim, saying, "I am asking you again listen to the Sgt no crime committed" and left his malicious and defamatory comment on his Facebook page for all to see, causing more harm. Vella's defence is to rely on the misconceived view of Sgt Dufus that his post was not a crime.Bedfordshire Police Legal Services were again, put on notice of a Judicial Review and given 14 days to reply. On the 15th day, they replied with We remind you that paragraph 5 of the Pre-Action Protocol for Judicial Review states that “judicial review should only be used where no adequate alternative remedy, such as a right of appeal, is available”.The decision to take no further action with respect to your allegations, is one which you have the right to request be reviewed under the Victims’ Right to Review scheme. The details of this scheme are available online: https://www.beds.police.uk/advice/advice-and-information/victim-support/victims-right-review-scheme/ Their response was incorrect, and they would have known it was intentionally trying to backpedal from a known unlawful decision that they could never expect to succeed in the High Court.The response to the supposed Legal professionals was swift and brutal. The suspect was identified but not interviewed. Therefore, the link you provided is incorrect and being from the legal services department is grossly incompetent of intended to mislead. I therefore will be reporting the advice given to PSD and the SRA, please advise the name of the SRA regulated Solicitor who gave me this advice. To which Bedfordshire Police Legal Services replied with In accordance with the pre-action protocol, with a view to trying to settle the dispute without the need for proceedings and to avoid unnecessary expense, we are prepared to carry out a review of the decision to take no further action. That review would be carried out in the same way as a VRR review.If you do not wish such a review to be undertaken, we are prepared to treat your document headed ‘Statement of Facts and Grounds in support of the Claimant’s application for permission to apply for judicial review’ as standing in for your letter before claim. We will provide a substantive response within 14 days of your written confirmation that you do not wish for a review to be undertaken. It is clear in their reply that they are trying to avoid the process at all costs (and those costs would be heavy), but as they were put on notice of Judicial Review, their response shows Bedfordshire Police have conceded.Bedfordshire police have shown on several occasions how they have allowed George Vella to commit criminal offences against several people. George Vella is a vile old man, and for some reason, he is allowed to attack teenage girls, women, children (convicted) and men.

I do not normally write articles like this as it does not directly link to police corruption, but, it is a matter that police should further investigate as it is a man who knowingly and intentionally abused his right to self-identify as a female so that a young female police officer had to search him.Joe Public UK, aka Ben Harrison, is a notorious police hater who claims he was arrested for committing ABH (Actual Bodily Harm).Ben Harrison was asked if he was happy for the male police officer to search him, and he said "NO"Ben says, "I don't want a man touching me", indicating he wants a female to. He turns to a young female officer saying, "She will be alright to do it" Young female who had to search the pervert When he was at the custody desk, he said he identifies as a female, giving the reason he is scared of men.Ben goes on to say to the male custody sergeant, "You wouldn't want me touching your willy would you"The young female professionally did her job, and Ben Harrison says, "Oh my god, You are not going to rape me now, are you?".The custody Sgt was clearly offended by this allegation that a young female would want to rape him, saying, "It is not funny to make jokes about rape is it?" The search was quite intimate, and this is the reason it is gender-based task. It is not expected for a perverted man to abuse such a right to allow him to be touched by a woman.Ben Harrison had no regard for what she had to do because he intentionally misled the police for this perverted purpose.I am not going to link to his channel, I do not support the abuse of females, even if they are police officers. My issue with police is NOT gender based.On YouTube, the author of the video, (in this case, Ben Harrison) can click a thumbs up of a comment if he likes it, or, if he especially loves the comment, the red heart can be used. As you can see, Ben used the red heart for the following sinister comments by some odd men who find it amusing.

Alleged Rape by a serving police officer This story is of a female, Joanna (not her real name), who was the victim of historical child abuse. Joanna became romantically involved with the still-serving police officer, PC Alistair Gowlands.Joanna tells us she met Gowlands at her gym, on a CrossFit night out and she confided in him, knowing he was a police officer, that she was in a very controlling relationship and that she had had an argument that evening.Gowlands told Joanna that he would look after her and make sure she was okay.Joanna says that Gowlands tried to help her overcome her childhood trauma by suggesting she engage in the sordid re-enactments of the child abuse she suffered, with him.Joanna says she consented to sexual activity with Gowlands based on his assurances that his suggestion would help her, but afterwards, realised that she had been tricked and manipulated into engaging in sexual intercourse.Joanna says that she would not have consented had she been in the correct state of mind, she said she felt safe as Gowlands was a police officer.Joanna says Gowlands manipulated her into the sordid acts and by doing so believes she was raped. She says Gowlands went on to stalk her. It is believed that Gowlands has not denied intercourse but has denied it was rape. The MET police have taken no action. PC Alistair Gowlands PC Alistair Gowlands Rape Crisis says rape, amongst other things, occurs when a victim is tricked or manipulated into sex, even if they consent. It also says that a person who has a mental health disorder cannot necessarily consent. PC Steve Farrell​ PC Steve Farrell We have also been reliably informed that Gowlands received horrific porn on a mobile device by a PC Steve Farrell. This incident was reported to the MET police however we are unaware of the outcome of any police investigations.We have also been provided shocking evidence, in the form of police-taken photographs, of bruising to the jaw, forearm and shoulder.The injuries are to a former partner of PC Gowlands, allegedly attributed to him but she was apparently persuaded to drop the charges Assault allegation Love message PC Gowlands was also using the police email system for sending inappropriate messages to Joanna from his work computer. This final piece of information shows how Gowlands shared confidential police information relating to a drugs arrest undertaken by a PC Power.To our understanding, PC Alistair Gowlands has not been held to account for any of the actions within this artice.All information has been provided to us in good faith and is a matter of public interest. Confidential Data If you are mentioned in this article, you have right of reply. Please use the right to reply option on our contact form.If you are a victim of rape or sexual abuse, please refer to the Government website for advice.For support, contact the Maggie Oliver Foundation.

The UKCP website has recently been provided with screenshots from a Nottinghamshire Police WhatsApp group with many disturbing photographs and comments from serving Nottinghamshire police officers. We have also been reliably informed that Nottinghamshire Police have seen the screenshots and taken no action.The known police officers in the WhatsApp group are Adam Brown (Adam 'Squat' Brown), Jonny Groves, Louis Jamieson, Matthew Storor, John Cross, Karl Wilson, Andy Crawford, John Burton, Andy Cummins, Jach Millichip & Aaron Chen. All of the named police officers were privy to the offensive comments. Misogynist discussions of Louise Haskey, cops go the gym to get off on females. John Cross posts an image of a young girl, Adam Brown makes a inappropriate comments.

A self-professed ex-Merseyside Police officer has trolled a rape victim of Asian descent, making such comments, relating the rape victims that "They simply can’t take it, mate they’re pathetic!"Old Scouse Cop, as he refers to himself on Twitter, using the Twitter Handle @CopScouse proudly uses an inflammatory and apparent racist profile statement. "Came to the country in a small boat" Says it all doesn't it" Other Twitter uses, some of whom are Survivors of Sexaul Abuse have responded to the ex Merseyside police officer with commentsRape survivor, KASS @BillieJ77670185 replied Can't take what? Rape? Yes a bit not right

Sergeant 5033 Power has confirmed that it is NOT a crime to post malicious, grossly offensive comments about anyone on Facebook, so long as you only post it on your Facebook page, even if it is public. You can say anything you want about any person (including Sgt Power), as he says (with authority) that for it to be Malicious Communications, it MUST be sent to a person or the victim. How wrong he is!Sgt Power goes on to say Facebook is Freedom of Speech, and by signing up to Facebook, you are agreeing to this. He also said that it was an offence of Slander in Civil Law. Again, Sgt Power is wrong. Written defamatory comments are libel, not slander.Sgt 5033 Power is called out as being clueless in such areas of law and failing victims of crime.The call recording is available, and Sergeant 5033 Power has given permission for it to be published, which is being considered.Sergeant 5033 Power clearly does not understand this area of the law, and this is of great concern, as what he has said is completely wrong, and many victims may have been deprived of justice by incompetent policing.PC Smith claimed that he had all the legislation and CPS guidance in front of him and that he and his Sergeant (Sgt Power) do not need it to be sent to them. Legal Framework Section 127 of the Communications Act 2003 ('CA 2003') says It is not necessary to show the message was addressed to, or received by, another person. The actus reus of the offence is complete when the message is sent – see DPP v Collins UKHL 40, and DPP v Kingsley Smith EWHC 359 (Admin). This will cover the posting of a message, and indeed re-posting or other sharing of a communication. EMM Legal on the subject of 'sending' in relation to the Malicious Communications Act 1988 Sent to another person: ‘Sending’ is ordinarily understood but is put beyond doubt by section 1(3) MCA which states “(3) In this section references to sending include references to delivering or transmitting and to causing to be sent, delivered or transmitted and “sender” shall be construed accordingly.” Accordingly, any transmission or delivery of a communication, be it to a website, social media platform, or directly to an individual, will constitute the act of ‘sending’. CPS guidance on social media and other electronic communications (b) Who a communication is sent toThe prosecution must establish that the message was sent to another person. Depending on the facts of the case, a social media communication which is merely a blog or a comment posted on a website may not suffice as sending to another. Prosecutors should consider the evidence that the communication was addressed (either by name or in terms) to a specific recipient, and how likely the specific recipient was to receive it (did they also have a Twitter or Facebook account?). Summary Anyone with an understanding of the law can see that Sgt 5033 Power is lacking in his knowledge but using his power to make incorrect (and therefore illegal for the purpose of Judicial Review) decisions. The offence reported is very fact-specific, facts which Sgt Power ignored before making his illegal decision.A complaint has been submitted, and an application for a Judicial Review of the decision will be made should the decision not be changed.This will be the 2nd Judicial Review against Bedfordshire Police related to offences committed by the same offender. The first was conceded by the former Chief Constable, Gary Forsyth, costing the taxpayer over £20,000. Sgt Power has been asked for his comments.

In 2021, Lancashire police appear to have made a serious data breach by leaking sensitive, confidential information about a vulnerable person to a West Midlands Troll, Neil Wilkes, based on his own comment on a post made by George Vella.On 29th May 2023 at 22:17, George Vella posted the following comment. I can hear him screaming data breach and he could of had all this information and would of won any claim. LOL. Full medical report. Even his doctor says he's nuts! Below his comment was the following screenshot from Lancashire police, admitting to a data breach and asking the recipient to destroy it.(Click to enlarge)It is obvious that George Vella (a man who has a criminal conviction for photographing children over a garden wall), is taking great delight in attacking the victim with mental health issues.George Vella is clearly expecting the victim to see it by his comment, "I can hear him screaming data breach", then confirms he has the victim's medical report, which George Vella goes on to suggest the victim is NUTS.As George Vella has a private medical report, and based on Vella's own comment relating to a serious mental health condition, it would appear George Vella is committing a hate crimeThe CPS say "Any criminal offence which is perceived by the victim or any other person, to be motivated by hostility or prejudice, based on a person's disability or perceived disability; race or perceived race; or religion or perceived religion; or sexual orientation or perceived sexual orientation or transgender identity or perceived transgender identity." George Vella's friend, Neil Wilkes (whose own wife confirmed that Neil got a minor pregnant), dives into the conversation to confirm he was the recipient of the data breach. Neil Wilkes posted the following. I told them they sent it me so I'm keeping it in the bundle.They threatened a court order to remove it and I told them crack on go and get one.I've heard nothing since then, and it remains in the bundle Neil Wilkes ignores the police request to destroy the data and makes it clear he intends to use the personal data of another person for his own sick malicious reasons and finds it comical that he has amassed significant confidential material. It is unknown if this is the personal data of a child.Neil Wilkes posts a further comment 1 minute later, saying. It is funny how it has Name, date of birth, address, medical ailments listed, NHS number, surgery details, phone number and more details 😀 Darren Hogan (who has police cautions for child abuse) is another notorious convicted troll from the West Midlands who then requests a copy of the personal data breached by Lancashire police. Hogan is also facing prosecution for targeting a 15-year-old Girl and is soon to face the courts.Darren Hogan says Send it to me Making matters worse, many of George Vella's cult like followers have LAUGHED at or LIKED this post, clearly abusing a vulnerable victim.The Hate Crime has been reported to the policeA Freedom of Information request has been made to Lancashire police about the data breach, and they have been asked if the Subject of the Data breach was made aware and that the Subject should be notified of the distribution of their personal data.The ICO will be notified in due course.If you are suffering from Mental Health Issues, please contact Mental Health Awareness or MIND

The following video shows Norfolk police attendance at Boyland Hall in Norfolk on 14 Jan 2018 when called by the homeowners on 999 during an armed raid by more than four men. The police arrested the homeowner and son and charged them both with racially aggravated ABH, harassment & battery (common assault by beating). Police were told at the scene that one of the men had a handgun, another a crossbow-type weapon. Norfolk police did not search their cars. Three knives were found hidden in the ground the following day. Shortly before the trial, police accidentally unredacted evidence that they already knew that the man carries a gun and uses it. At trial, the other was forced to admit he did have a weapon. Two Crown Court trials ran out of time, and at the third, Nigel Stringer and his son were acquitted after four weeks of evidence and four years of waiting. At the time of arrest, Nigel Stringer was a serving Norfolk Magistrate of 26 years. The evidence shown in the video has all been disclosed at three criminal trials and one civil trial. It is, therefore, public knowledge and lawful to display. The Stringers have commenced a civil claim against Norfolk Police for £500,000.’

Zayna Iman was arrested by GMP in 2021 and taken to Pendleton rape Police Station, where she was held by GMP for over 40 hours.During this prolonged detention (in which Zayna was not charged with any offence), Zayna was sexually abused.GMP is refusing to release all of the CCTV footage to her.In fact, GMP has tried desperately to blame Zayna for this incident, going so far as to claim she had mental health problems allowing them to Section her while in custody. This is the reason that the detention was for over 40 hours.After awakening in custody, Zayna was horrified to feel she had been penetrated and was bleeding from 'the front and back'.Zayna was assessed by medical staff, who stated she had been date raped.Zayna had only been in the care of Greater Manchester Police and had been so for 40 hours preceding this assessment.GMP had refused to undertake any reasonable investigation into the serious allegations. Sadly, this was impaired by Zayna's previous help by an incompetent law firm (Hadfield Grainger & McNally Legal Consultants Ltd), who are currently being sued. FACT - Zayna was not bleeding before the arrest. FACT - After the arrest and detention, Zayna was unable to walk properly. FACT - CCTV evidence of Zayna leaving custody was also retained by GMP. This is a serious allegation of rape/sexual abuse at the hands of serving Greater Manchester Police officers.Even though the incident took place before the current Chief Constable, Stephen Watson, took to the role. CC Stephen Watson has ignored any request for this to be investigated. Chief Constable Stephen Watson has, so far, turned a blind eye to alleged rapists within GMP.GMP has only now, after 27 months of pressure, finally agreed to investigate the allegations and send clothing worn by Zayna for forensic analysis. https://youtu.be/j5mWE2nwMF4 Full story coming soon...

Helen Lovatt - Investigator 8107, who works in the Investigations Team for Bedfordshire, Cambridgeshire & Hertfordshire Professional Standards Department, has confirmed that they use secret internal documents in what should be a transparent complaints process.Helen Lovatt has made a decision that a complaint made against several officers have no indication of misconduct, and in a response to the complained seeking a rationale for the illogical decision, she said The decision should take account of the facts being asserted by the complainant, alongside any readily available evidence and does not focus solely on what the complainant says those facts are. The alleged behaviour is then assessed against the Beds, Cambs & Herts assessment of behaviour guide. Based on this the Appropriate Authority has agreed that at this time Special Procedures are not engaged as the threshold is not met. As previously stated, this decision will remain under review during the investigation. After requesting a copy of the assessment behaviour guide, Helen Lovatt responded. In relation to the assessment of behaviour guide, this is an internal document that is only relevant to the person conducting an assessment and is not provided to the complainant as part of the complaint process. The IOPC publish the rules and procedures for complaint investigation and nothing in the IOPC guidelines refers to any secret assessment of behaviour guide.The complaint is of corruption and abuse of power and there is no readily available evidence to the contrary, yet, Helen Lovatt refuses to consider misconduct.Helen Lovatt is investigating the complaint against Tanya Shotbolt, who was tasked with undertaking an investigation resulting from a costly Judicial Review that Bedfordshire police desperately failed to defend.Bedfordshire police had refused to investigate a sick old man named George Vella for committing Malicious Communications against several people. Since this time, the dirty old man has abused a teenage girl online and gloats when police take no action.The Judicial Review outcome was that Bedfordshire police were to review their decision not to interview or prosecute this dirty old man.Tanya Shotbolt performed this review, and without even considering ANY OF THE EVIDENCE, Tanya Shotbolt made a determination that Bedfordshire police did nothing wrong.A complaint was made to Bedfordshire police, who, (as expected), failed to uphold the complaint, but an appeal to the IOPC was successful and directed Bedfordshire police to investigate correctly.Now, Helen Lovatt is involved in the cesspit of corruption, and she says she can see 'no indication of misconduct' from Tanya Shotbolt, who abused her power to dispose of an investigation by completely ignoring crucial evidence.This is evidence that a High Court Judge said, "The offence is a prosecutable offence", yet, Bedfordshire police turned a blind eye and all the minions of PSD are doing what they do best and covering for police misconductBedfordshire police are digging themselves deeper and deeper to protect George Vella, which begs the question, why?Helen Lovatt and her superior, Mark Fava (Herts police) are now subject to police complaints alleging corruption.

This is an audio recording of Lancashire police intentionally lying about trying to contact a victim who was made aware of a contract killing on his life.This is a follow on article where Lancashire police blamed the victim for delays in the same call.After failing to get back to the victim, the victim called for an update, and the Lancashire police call handler lied, saying the police had tried to call in the early hours.This is the call recording claiming to have tried calling the victim in the early hours. This is the call logs show no call was made/received in the early hours between the two calls made to Lancashire police highlighted in the image in red. (private information redacted)Lancashire police are no stranger to LYING, see previous article