The list emerges from Sontagâs diaries as the authorâs signature form. And itâs a strange form at that: the list is a potentially infinite structure made up of distilled, often epigrammatic parts. Itâs a form that expands and contracts to meet the needs of its author; it may be brief or expansive, important or ephemeral, and, in Sontagâs hands, it takes on many roles: an argument or an organizer, an aide-mĂŠmoire or a way of conferring value. The result of her âcompulsionâ not just to inventory but to reduce the world to a collection of scrutable parts, the list, Sontagâs archive makes clear, is always unstable, always ready to be added to or subtracted from. The list is a form of flux.
Susan Sontag famously believed that lists confer value and affirm our existence. A decade after her death, as her digital archive is being made accessible to scholars and fans, the LA Review of Books examines the repercussions in a beautiful essay:
All archival labor negotiates the twin responsibilities of preservation and access.
Sontag is â serendipitously, it seems â an ideal subject for exploring the new horizon of the born-digital archive, for the tension between preservation and flux that the electronic archive renders visible is anticipated in Sontagâs own writing. Any Sontag lover knows that the author was an inveterate list-maker.Â
Reading Sontagâs lists in their original e-environment brings the issues of the digital archive â with its constant push-and-pull between proliferation and deep freeze â to the surface.
We cannot see when and where Sontag added to a list, or when or where she deleted from it. There are no cross-outs, no carets, no smudges. Certain kinds of traces, familiar in more traditional archives, are absent from the digital environment.
Listing and searching both provide us with ways, however flawed, to cut through redundancy, to make meaning out of chaos, to, in Sontagâs vocabulary, confer and create âvalue,â even âexistence.â This impulse to list, to search, or, in other words, to reduce â an impulse researchers necessarily share with Sontag herself â takes on a peculiar resonance in the context of the guarded writerâs archive
Full piece here. Complement with Sontagâs lists of likes and dislikes, illustrated
s-u-f-j-a-n-s-t-e-v-e-n-s
ellievsbear
discoholicmusic
izzy806
prguitarman
pixelskylines
