Kyra, she/her, aro/ace, queer in general. I have a lot of Loki feelings. I write fanfic sometimes, mostly about Loki. I like stupid jokes and I play games on easy because I'm an adult and I can do that if I want to. I also dabble in customizing action figures, and I have an Etsy shop for simple Funko Pop! customs and a few other things. Formerly visions-and-revisions. I also run the Hope Jar and Alaska Gothic. Ace Inquisitor icon by doriansbutt--go commission them!
because I’d love to have a fancier pinned post but realistically it’ll be years before I get around to making one and I’d like something useful in the meantime, I’m just going to make a list of potentially interesting/relevant links...
Archive of Our Own (also I have several invites)
Twitter, Instagram, Bluesky, Mastodon grudgingly and I haven’t actually used it yet
Discord: 100indecisions
Grouvee but I mostly just use it for obsessively listing games I’ve played or want to play rather than talking about them
GoodReads and Storygraph, ditto, although I do occasionally write book reviews on GoodReads, especially about Loki-related books (I have a whole shelf for this...and another shelf of Hiddleston-related books)
my tiny Etsy shop
my carrd, with a few other links
a scattershot guide to shopping with Xianyu and Superbuy
and tags:
occasionally I write things: my writing tag (all finished stuff is on AO3 though)
adventures in customizing: customized action figures (well, mostly Funko figures) and other craft-type things sometimes
my meta: my meta/headcanon posts, which sometimes means original posts and sometimes just means I reblogged something and added a little in the tags; primarily but not exclusively about Loki (one in particular is my attempt at a comprehensive list of evidence that Loki was tortured on Sanctuary)
the adventures of tiny Loki and Thor: silly action figure photos
loki show: well that’s my tag for the Loki show. it’s also the one to blacklist if you really hated it, because I mostly really liked it, so nearly everything I post about it is positive
I have an army...of Loki figures: my collection of Loki figures, plushies, pins, etc. I’ve been building it since at least 2014. it’s, uh, large
my kids: my fuzzy children (one dog, one cat)...and characters I make in games, because they are also my children
kyra plays: posts about games I’m playing
fic rec: fic recs
queer stuff: self-explanatory
this whole thing smacks of gender: apparently I might not be 100% cis after all, which is news to me (I’m like. still mostly cis but also a tiny bit agender, but specifically in a “my tag about this is based on a dril tweet” way?)
plagueblogging: started out as personal pandemic-related stuff, kinda expanded to 2020 in general, kinda went back to being specifically pandemic-related when 2020 ended and everything that came with it...didn’t (as of April 2022, includes my own experiences with covid, yaaaay)
cool stuff people made me: commissions and art requests mostly
the-hope-jar: my sideblog for just like...hopeful/encouraging/happy things
alaska-gothic: my sideblog for what it says on the tin (includes some of my own photography, although not a lot, and I keep meaning to post more)
Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
✓ Live Streaming✓ Interactive Chat✓ Private Shows✓ HD Quality✓ Free Actions
Free to watch • No registration required • HD streaming
I bring you: custom Funko Quantum Suit Loki, something we would’ve gotten from canon in Endgame if there were any justice in the world! Imagine an AU where Loki doesn’t immediately die in IW, right, so he’s there to help out on the Time Heist, instead of or alongside Thor? Yes, it would’ve been great. (Arguably, this is Loki from one of @bedlamsbard's AUs!)
Somewhat embarrassed to admit this is my first finished custom figure in quite a while and it’s pretty damn simple, just Ragnarok Loki’s head and daggers and Quantum Suit Ant-Man’s body, and the reason it took me so long to get around to it despite this being little more than a head swap is those stupid daggers. I thought they might be a problem and they were. They didn’t want to stay glued to the fists in the first place and even when I got them to attach, they still wouldn’t stick very solidly, so they’ll break back off without much effort. You might notice one of them is braced on his leg because there was no other way to make it stay at all. And even then they look a little wonky, although you mostly can’t tell from this angle.
The important thing though is that he’s done and he’s cute. (Also if I hadn’t insisted on giving him daggers I would’ve done this at least 6 years ago.)
Please send good vibes Hazy’s way, or something—she has a dental cleaning tomorrow, which is always kind of a big deal because it involves full anesthesia, but there’s also a small lump under the skin on her side I want them to check out while she’s under, so I’m nervous about that. I'm not even sure how thoroughly they'll be able to check it out at this point, so the likeliest outcome is a "yeah we should take a closer look at that" and I'll just have to worry about it even longer until they can
poor baby had ten teeth removed, pretty much everything on the bottom I think, and I don't know how inevitable that was at this point for a little dog but I sure feel like a horrible mother for not trying hard enough to brush her teeth. Scully just kind of lost teeth steadily with each cleaning until they were all gone, but until now Hazy's only had to get one pulled, so she was doing really well until now. :( she's not feeling great from a combination of extraction pain and coming off anesthesia.
and they couldn't find the lump. apparently three different people tried. it can't be that hard...but now I'm suddenly wondering if I got confused and told them the wrong side of her body? anyway I guess we're going to have to go through more stress for another sedated appointment to get that checked out. somehow. obviously it would be a lot easier if she would let the vets touch her without being sedated.
"Kill your darlings" means "if something is holding you back, get rid of it, even if it sounds pretty."
That's it! That's all it means! It means if you're stuck and stalled out on your story and you could fix the whole block by removing something but you're avoiding removing that thing because it's good, you remove that thing. That's the darling.
It does NOT mean
That you have to get rid of your self-indulgent writing
That you should delete something just because you like it (?wtf?)
That you need to kill off characters (??? what)
That you have to pare your story down to the absolute bare bones
That you have to delete anything whatsoever if you don't want to
The POINT is that you STOP FEELING GUILTY for throwing out good writing that isn't SERVING THE STORY.
The POINT is that you don't get so HUNG UP on the details that you lose sight of the BIG PICTURE.
The way people have twisted “kill your darlings” into “anything you really love has to go, because you love it and for no other reason” is something I’m very comfortable blaming on Protestantism because that kind of thing is millimeters away from “[x] has become an idol in your life” where [x] is the most innocuous thing imaginable but the sin is that you like it
Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
✓ Live Streaming✓ Interactive Chat✓ Private Shows✓ HD Quality✓ Free Actions
Free to watch • No registration required • HD streaming
Please send good vibes Hazy’s way, or something—she has a dental cleaning tomorrow, which is always kind of a big deal because it involves full anesthesia, but there’s also a small lump under the skin on her side I want them to check out while she’s under, so I’m nervous about that. I'm not even sure how thoroughly they'll be able to check it out at this point, so the likeliest outcome is a "yeah we should take a closer look at that" and I'll just have to worry about it even longer until they can
everyone in the notes we are all holding hands. everyone who hasnt worked on a wip in weeks or months or years, its okay. we are going slow but we are going
If Ratatouille mechanics were real, there would be a whole market of businesses offering the services of operating rats to people who want them, and it'd be like how bees produce honey. People in the rat business would be so exhausted of having to explain over and over again that no, the rats aren't being exploited. If the rats didn't like how they're being treated, they would simply not return. There's no goddamn way to force a rat to be so passionate about playing the saxophone that they'll figure out how to puppeteer a human to do it for them. All that the business does is finding a way to put that specific rat in the hair of someone who's about to go on stage.
A rat manager who is a rat and deals on their end of the deal is exhausted of having to explain over and over again that look, an average fully grown adult human being is like 200 times your weight, their hands are very fast and they can throw things better than you want to imagine. If one of them things didn't want you in their hair, you're not going to stay there for long. You'd be yote out the window in two seconds flat.
THE HUMANITY OF LOKI - AN ANALYSIS OF THE GOD OF MISCHIEF AND HIS KINDREDNESS WITH MORTALS
THE HUMANITY OF LOKI - AN ANALYSIS OF THE GOD OF MISCHIEF AND HIS KINDREDNESS WITH MORTALS Abstract: Loki, The God of Mischief, has played
Being brave and posting my paper! Please keep in mind this is just a ‘complete’ first draft and will not be perfect! It’s been around 8-9 years since I wrote anything like this lmao (media studies in school was probably the last time!)
It focuses on (MCU) Loki’s relationships with other “more powerful” characters and how his trauma affects this, his identity, how he finds himself in the same cycles and why he (in my opinion) is closer to mortals than other gods for his struggles and vulnerabilities.
This piece is subjective and my interpretation of the texts Marvel Studios provided with the films & series with some references to external sources such as interviews/quotes.
Word count: 6920
Abstract below the cut!
Loki, The God of Mischief, has played many roles within Marvel’s Cinematic Universe; from trickster to villain, a harbinger of chaos and of order, antagonist and hero… However, beneath all the illusions and masks, Loki is a character that at his core is far more mortal than some, even himself, may realise. Despite being a God, Loki is far closer to the humans he sought to rule with his vulnerabilities, sharing in similar conflicts like identity and his sense of self, insecurity, trauma, his need for acceptance, power and the search for purpose in his life. Loki is beloved by many, appealing to those in the audience who have in their own ways faced similar struggles; there’s a humanity to him that draws viewers in, a sense of recognition and reflection. However, this isn’t only present outside of the Marvel Cinematic Universe, it also exists within said universe, despite the characters insistence that he is above such sentimentality, mortality and weakness.
In this paper, I will explore this subject by analysing Loki’s actions, traits and his words. Using his infamous ‘kneel before me’ speech from ‘The Avengers (2012)’, I will demonstrate how his words directed towards the mortals are actually a reflection of his own feelings and experiences; diving into the ways in which Loki has a kindredness with mortals and how his desire to rule over them was an attempt to bring some order to his own chaotic existence. I will be using and referencing the cinematic releases from Marvel featuring Loki along with the Disney+ series ‘Loki’, exploring his origin, his relationship with powerful figures and how it has affected him, the self-sabotaging cycles he finds himself stuck in, why he makes the choices he does, how he views himself and how he is often paralleled by mortal characters like ‘He Who Remains’.
Loki once believed there were no men like him, that he was above the mortals, that he could be a saviour to the people of Earth, but in his struggle for power and control, for recognition, he was diminishing his own life’s joy. Does Loki’s quest for power represent his natural state? Does Loki in some way crave subjugation? Does Loki’s repetitive behaviour and relationships with more powerful beings indicate he was made to be ruled? In my analysis, I hope to draw some conclusions to these questions and delve deeper into the heart of the God of Mischief and why in the end, he will always kneel.
Today (Wednesday 5th Aug 2026) the UK has brought into force a trans segregationist policy stating that single sex spaces must be defined by sex assigned at birth, effectively a trans bathroom ban the same as many of the most right wing states of the US. On top of this, the guidance now in force mandates that trans people be outed non-consensually at their workplace and asked to use the incorrect bathroom by their employers, which will drive higher unemployment in an already disproportionately unemployed and unemployable population.
Today is a deeply horrible and dark day in British democracy as a policy pushed by a select few fascists engaging in a campaign of bullying, sexual harassment, lawfare and institutional capture have pushed through a policy that the vast majority disagree with oriented around harming a tiny minority of the population.
The only solution that will create change is that trans people need to organise. When this guidance was first proposed I wrote the following essay, outlining the specifics of how someone can set up a trans assembly from which harm reduction structures can be formed and clear directions from the trans community can be given to our cis allies, strengthening our political position and creating a pathway back towards being recognised as human beings while protecting the most vulnerable amongst us in the meantime.
I am aware of half a dozen locations where people have started organising towards a trans assembly since I made this, although none of them are in the UK. We desperately need this kind of organising here. We need trans assemblies and we need community formed and focused harm reduction structures.
I have made myself available to people who have started holding regular assemblies in other places to review their constitutions and organising structures and consult with them to get them off the ground, and I may at some point write a followup comparing the results. I am more than happy to help anyone who is putting together a project like this.
Please share this and organise like our lives depend on it.
Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
✓ Live Streaming✓ Interactive Chat✓ Private Shows✓ HD Quality✓ Free Actions
Free to watch • No registration required • HD streaming
I know I keep mentioning this damn paper but I still can’t find the finished 6000 words and it’s doing my nut in— BUT ANYWAY— I wanted to talk about a specific part I wrote about—
(Mentions of trauma.)
The rantings of a ex-media studies girly about the psychology behind Loki and his tendency to form imbalanced/unhealthy relationships:
In the MCU, Loki has the habit of forming/falling into ‘imbalanced relationships’ and this is very common for people who have been through trauma regarding a prominent figure in their life (partner, parent, friend, sibling etc). It isn’t a conscious decision, nor is it so they put themselves in another bad position, but it is something that unfortunately occurs.
I believe that this is what happens to Loki, over and over. His own self admitted fear of ‘being alone’ and insecurities regarding his identity and sense of self exasperates his need for something familiar - even if it is toxic or unhealthy. Loki’s whole life is rooted in lies and deception, half-truths and uncertainty, and all he knows is his ‘own role’ (so to speak) amongst his adoptive family. On Asgard, as an Odinson, he perceived himself (and was likely perceived by others) as the ‘lesser son’, ‘the outsider’, ‘a shadow living in the shade of Thor’s greatness’. He was seen as ‘the silver tongue’, ‘the prince of lies’, ‘the God of Mischief’, so all he had was these perceptions to go off, he couldn’t trust himself when it came to his own identity - especially not after he found out his true heritage.
Loki finds himself falling into similar/adjacent dynamics that he had on Asgard with Odin and Thor. With Thanos, Loki is once again being used as a pawn in a wider (arguably political) game, just as Odin had originally planned for him as a baby. However, there is no love or affection from Thanos, the dynamic is different at its core, but it shares the same ideology. I don’t doubt Odin did love Loki and come to see him as his own, however, he was still a bad father and caused a lot of deep rooted issues for Loki.
Then Loki finds himself on Sakaar with the Grandmaster, and whilst the film does a bit of a naff job showing it, he is dangerous. He is the ‘all powerful ruler’, and Loki is immediately drawn to him, under the guise of overthrowing him. Perhaps in a way, Loki sees this as a way to prove his own capability, to show that he makes his own choices etc - but it also traps him in the other cycle he finds himself in of ‘betraying’ others and acting selfishly/in a self-sabotaging manner.
Even in the series, Loki bonds with Mobius. Now, whilst this dynamic is different and more genuine, Mobius is still technically the one with all the power (especially in S1/within the TVA walls). Mobius literally could have Loki reset at any moment, and yet, Loki sort of finds himself drawn to him in spite of that. Obviously, as I said, they do form a more genuine bond, but once again it is born from a place of imbalance and bargaining.
I think Loki is drawn to these types of relationships and people because of two reasons: 1). He strives to be the one to outwit them, to turn the tables and end up being the one who holds the power and 2). Because he subconsciously finds it familiar territory and in a ‘comfortable’, twisted way. (Now, don’t get my use of ‘comfortable’ confused, I use it loosely. I use it in terms of ‘I know this dynamic, I’ve been here before, it’s familiar’ not that he is content with it).
It’s a similar premise as someone who has been in a toxic relationship/situation/home. Unfortunately, these psychological cycles can be common amongst victims - and that isn’t their fault at all (been there bestie). It’s something manipulators are able to detect in them and use to their advantage. This is something Loki even does himself because he too is a manipulator. Loki is equipped with everything from what he has been through. His traits were learnt/honed over centuries of observing, enduring, analysing and internalising.
Loki mirrors people that have influenced him in some way, which I also think is a survival instinct. Hela said to Loki in regard to Odin: “You sound like him.” Whilst it could’ve been a jab, which I think is unlikely considering Hela had no clue who Loki was, I see this as an astute observation. Even in Thor 1, Loki declares that Thor isn’t ready to be King, stating the same issues Odin has with his son: “He’s arrogant, he’s reckless, he’s dangerous! Is that what Asgard needs from its King?” The way he speaks here sounds incredibly wise and knowledgeable, even when he himself isn’t exactly ‘ready’ to be King either - although, I would argue that he was the better choice even at this stage of his arc if he hadn’t had found out the truth about his heritage and had guidance from Frigga. Loki knows diplomacy, strategy and logic are important when being a ruler. How? Because of what he has seen from Odin.
In ‘Avengers’, Loki sounds more like a dictator, more like Thanos (and arguable perhaps how Odin sounded once upon a time too). He sounds like he believes what he says is right, that his word is law - just as Thanos did. However, it is far more nuanced and ‘royal’, still showcasing those traits he took from Odin. He sees his attempt to rule over Midgard as a kindness, a way to give mortals a purpose - maybe in turn attempting to find his own too. His whole speech in Germany, to me, is a reflection of his character and his story. It’s projection at its finest.
Loki both detests and looks up to these figures. They are what he believes he should be for whatever reasons he has - insecurity, identity, the need for power and control. I’m not saying that I think he actively wants to be like Odin or Thanos or The Grandmaster, but I think he knows how much control people like them have, and he feels if he achieves that same level of power, he can find some semblance of control in a life where he has quite often felt like he didn’t have much of it.
Loki is both simultaneously trying to break the cycle whilst finding himself continuously trapped in it. There’s a constant tug of war within him with his desires and his needs. He unintentionally sets himself up to fail, because he knows deep down he doesn’t want to be like them. In the series, we see this far more clearly with He Who Remains. HWR, to me, is Loki looking at a mirror of what he could’ve become: older than he looks, tired, alone, thinking he was the good guy but also knowing he was the villain in others stories…
It hit me specifically with this quote from He Who Remains: “Oh, I’ve been dubbed many names by many people… A ruler, a conquerer, He Who Remains… a jerk. But it’s not as simple as a name.”
On the sacred timeline, Loki had been many of those things - successfully or not. Even in S1 EP2 Miss Minutes specifically called Loki ‘a jerk’. Seeing HWR is what truly made TVA Loki change his trajectory, it was the last nail in the coffin from everything he had felt and learnt from Sylvie, Mobius and the experience with the TVA.
By the end of Thor Ragnarok, Loki chose to break the cycle, just as he broke the cycle in the series. However, on the scared timeline, that Loki didn’t get the chance to fully embrace this newfound ‘freedom’. And even in the series, Loki’s freedom ended up trapping him once again regardless, but this time for good - for something far greater than himself.
Loki’s story is very reflective of those who have gone through traumatic events, his traits can be seen through the lens of survival instincts and, of course, self-preservation: “I don’t enjoy hurting people. I do it because I have to- because I’ve had to.” Loki is very self-aware, but I don’t think even he fully understands just how deep the issues and trauma he carries goes. He had a very ‘get them before they get you’ mentality for most of the movies arc.
“They fuck you up, your mum and dad. They may not mean to, but they do. They fill you with the faults they had. And add some extra, just for you.”
Anyways— Yeah, this was probably all over the place cause it really was just a rant. 😌 But ya’ll get what I’m trying to say lmao. This is all just my own take/opinion. I doubt I’m the first to ever point this out either, just wanted to rant about it bc I find it fascinating. Also yes, speaking from experience here too with the dynamics talk!
I like this a lot, and I suspect Thanos actually saw this tendency in Loki right away and used it to his benefit. We don't actually know what their dealings together were like, as much fannish speculation as there's been over the years, but we know Thanos had Loki scared shitless, and he also--at least through the Other--mocked Loki's stated goal to conquer Midgard: "Your ambition is little, born of childish need." To me, that has a bit of a disapproving-father tone to it. I also see it as somewhat relevant that he has that whole Children of Thanos thing going on with the Black Order, Gamora, and Nebula--there is no particular reason to think he genuinely contemplated adopting Loki, but I think it's fair to say Thanos has a whole weird abusive-father thing going on with the people he uses as children and pawns and some of that may well have affected his treatment of Loki.
There's also a really interesting bit in the Legends episode about Loki where they overlay Loki's IW death scene with Ebony Maw's monologue to the Asgardians from slightly earlier, such that you can actually watch Loki's neck break to Ebony Maw saying "Even in death you have become Children of Thanos," which probably does not actually mean anything but I do think it's extremely interesting.
I also think the mention of Mobius here is pretty important, and it bothers me that people are so willing to gloss over this aspect of their relationship just because, like, they're cute together. I don't ship them, although that's because of some of the shippers rather than a problem with the ship itself, and I feel like it makes their dynamics a lot crunchier and more interesting to recognize these difficult parts than to ignore them.
Anyway yes this is cool meta about cycles of toxicity and abuse, and Odin is lucky that he got to peace out and never deal with how he fucked up his kids.
Turning this into its own post because it took too long not to, the general question being "why does Loki look that bad when he comes through the portal in Avengers?" and my general interpretation, formed in part due to a lot of other Tumblr posts, is that it's because of things done to him shortly before he went through the portal, but the more general-audience interpretation seems to be that it's from the portal travel itself.
so I scoured other sources trying to figure out what, exactly, the intent was with these opening Loki scenes and for the most part they don't say anything. The screenplay I found doesn't say a thing about how haggard he looks:
The newer Avengers novelization, adapted by Alex Irvine, similarly doesn't say anything about Loki looking sick, although it does have one interesting detail:
Something overloaded, and a wave of energy rolled out from it, flashing across the skin of Fury, Hawkeye, and the assembled scientists. They flinched, but they also wanted to see what was going on...
When the energy faded, a man was left on the platform. He was on one knee with his head tucked into his chest, as if riding out a storm [emphasis mine]. In the silence, they approached him. The energy blast had scattered equipment and materials across the floor. The man looked up at them and smiled as he stood. He was not a large man, not remarkable in any particular way. He had long black hair and wore black leather clothing, similar to what Fury was wearing. However, he wasn't a SHIELD agent. Fury didn't know where he had come from.
Also, the stranger held a kind of spear in his right hand. Set into its head, a gem glowed the same icy blue as the energy that had spilled from the Tesseract.
"Sir," Fury called as armed SHIELD agents closed nearer, "please put down the spear."
The man looked at the scepter as if he had only just noticed he had it. Then, slowly, he looked back up at Fury, and a vicious smile spread across his face.
The art book describes the scene like this:
And it shows this concept art of Loki looking even nastier, alongside a frame from the film of Loki looking...still pretty sick:
The art book does actually reference the scene I was initially reblogging:
So in the art book we have Loki's "voice betraying audible strain" although that could be from unease/impatience considering the rest of that sentence is "as dark energy continues to build in the chamber," and then we actually do get "Barton helps a visibly weakened Loki into the back of the truck," which I think shows up literally nowhere except the film itself and this one description here. The thing that bugs me is that nowhere do they actually say why Loki is visibly weakened (it sure wasn't from very easily fighting off a few humans) or why concept art and the finished film both showed Loki looking pretty awful, although in different ways and to different degrees, when he first came through the portal.
There's maybe a clue here in the reference to dark energy, but you'd need another book entirely to get more info on that. Loki does say something to Thor about how Odin must have had to conjure an incredible amount of dark energy to send him to Earth, and the TDW prelude comic, which I think is still canon, adds that doing so took a massive physical toll on both Odin and Thor, such that Thor arrived unconscious. So if we're supposed to assume that Loki's use of the Tesseract also involved dark energy, then that maybe sort of implies he's so worn out purely from the journey--but it seems pretty ridiculous that you need, like, one and a half sources outside the actual film to know about that.
(interestingly, the art book also refers to dark energy in relation to Loki's possession of Clint, implying at the time that the scepter and Tesseract were meant to be related and nobody had any idea about the Infinity Stones, because that was retconned later...so it's also safe to say dark energy is just kinda whatever you want it to be.)
the art book has a couple other interesting things to say: "Loki is a pawn in a much larger game, manipulated by forces far more interested in the Tesseract's vast and heretofore untapped potential." some of what Tom's said in interviews about Loki's missing time between movies is echoed here too:
The original Avengers novelization, which I'm pretty sure is not technically considered canon, explicitly takes the stance that Loki is wrecked from portal travel:
(If you're thinking, hey, this looks interesting, perhaps it is a more nuanced take on Loki's motivations? It is not. Loki gets this one instance of mild sympathy from the narrator and then he's just a smirking, mustache-twirling Bad Guy.)
So all that to say...there is not a lot explaining what was meant by these scenes of Loki seeming genuinely ill after coming out of the portal, at least not from what I would consider to be truly reliable sources, but I have to very grudgingly admit that it does seem like the intent was probably just that he was in terrible shape because, somehow, the journey there by Tesseract through an unstable portal was that hard, because of reasons.
but here's the thing, the other interpretation makes at least as much sense, especially considering we actually have the one scene of the Other threatening and hurting him onscreen, which these extratextual sources all either skip over entirely or misrepresent. And--okay, I know I'm reaching here, because I could rant for days about how the What If writers don't know shit about canon, so it's hardly fair of me to use a What If plot point to back up an interpretation, but, Captain Carter somehow came through the same portal into the PEGASUS facility in a different timeline and she was completely fine. so there is also that. I would be perfectly, spitefully happy to use the What If writers' sloppiness as my own loophole in finding evidence for the interpretation I like.
The Politics of Loki: The Revolutionary vs The Reformist and the Corrupt System
In this post, I will breakdown the politics of the ‘Loki’ show, touching on the systemic issues of the TVA, the political ideologies and a general analysis of the narrative and its characters. Please note that this is my own personal interpretation and analysis.
“The TVA is the problem. It's broken, it's rotten.” - Sylvie
“Burn it down, easy. Annihilating is easy. Razing things to the ground is easy. Trying to fix what's broken is hard. Hope is hard.” - Loki
‘The system is violence’ is a common phrase when it comes to the sociological concept of structural violence. In our world, it’s most commonly used in reference to racism, classism and sexism, but also in war and policing (and many other forms of violence). Within the world of the MCU and the ‘Loki’ show… It is used to explore the morals and ethics of the TVA, He Who Remains and Sylvie & Loki.
The TVA are portrayed as a fascist organisation, and its agents are operating under a lie from their dictator — He Who Remains. The people who live and breathe the TVA and its mission are victims. They were stolen from their lives, had their memories wiped blank and were put in a system that engaged in violence under the guise of ‘for the greater good’… Arguably, they were groomed. Anyone who discovered the truth or had doubts were punished — asking questions was heavily discouraged and viewed as a form of blasphemy against the Time Keepers. Hunter C-20 was an example of this corruption. The workers are fed propaganda, and are lead to believe that they are ‘the good guys’.
Even when we take a look at the material the agents saw daily within the TVA, we see rules that are there to discourage them from ‘chit chatting’ and ‘less meetings, more productivity’ (because talking creates discussion and discussion can create questions), and limiting their breaks/pie to ‘1 slice per week’ and how ‘bartering for extra tokens is forbidden’. It’s small forms of control, to keep them in line.
The ‘verify through deletion’ and ‘always watching’ tells us the most about how the TVA operates.
The TVA uses surveillance as a form of control, monitoring its agents, the timelines and variants to maintain power. It encourages the agents to ‘stay in line’ and self-police themselves, also creating an environment in which people are less likely to question the system/the Time Keepers. There are many forms of surveillance, from literal CCTV and data to the concepts of religion.
The TVA uses both.
The Time Keepers are seen as these ‘all-seeing’ Gods, saviours of the multiverse and looked up to by the agents — Ravonna Renslayer is an example of this belief, and even when the truth of the Time Keepers is revealed, she still remains staunch in the mission the represented. Renslayer reminds Mobius that the Time Keepers are ‘always watching’. Knowing you are being watched is not an inherently comfortable feeling for most people, so when Renslayer says this, it isn’t a comfort, it’s a warning — a reminder to Mobius of his place in the system. The agents even believe that the Time Keepers created them! The Time Keepers are their ‘God’/‘Creator’. Even calling the main timeline ‘The Sacred Timeline’ is a religious allegory. The story told to the agents (and variants) about why the TVA was created is there to instil fear and cooperation. But also, the TVA/Time Keepers make the agents feel special, like they are saving and protecting the Sacred Timeline — they give the agents a God Complex.
The TVA treats variants as criminals. It mirrors how the real world treats prisoners/criminals (innocent or guilty). When Loki is arrested for his “crimes against the Sacred Timeline”, B-15 even says something that is reminiscent of what a police officer would say to a detainee: “On behalf of the Time Variance Authority, I hereby arrest you for crimes against the Sacred Timeline. Hands up. You’re coming with us.” When Loki questions them, B-15 tells him: “Last chance variant.” As soon as the Minutemen step through the time door, they have their weapons raised, and when Loki tries to evade, he is immediately met with violence and collared like an animal.
In Season 2, we are introduced to the fact that the TVA has literal torture devices… We learn in Season 1 about the Void and how it’s essentially just a giant, free-roaming, (mostly) inescapable prison that banks on a giant cloud monster called ‘Alioth’, that is described as a ‘guard-dog’, to eat them… (Or that the variants will likely kill each other.)
Variants are just living their lives, unaware of the system and its influence, yet they are treated like criminals/problems that need to be dealt with — by erasure from existence.
Loki is then brought in, no one answers his questions, offers him any personable explanation… They simply log him, strip him (removing any visual evidence of his identity and to give him a lack of autonomy) and process him. Once he is processed, he is given a trial. He has a chance to ‘plead his case’, despite no one telling him what exactly his crime was. Judge Renslayer ‘hears him out’ and rules to reset him. It had nothing to do with the fact Loki’s defence was weak or unprepared, it has everything to do with the fact that this is how they operate at the TVA. Everyone is ‘verified through deletion’, the trial is set up so every variant that comes through those halls is ruled ‘guilty’. The trial is a farce, smoke and mirrors, to give the illusion to the agents that what they are doing is just and ‘protecting society’ — a mock court. The justice system within the TVA is set up to fail the variants. It’s similar to how the automat is filled with only keylime pie. It gives the illusion of choice to the agents.
Mobius ‘saves’ Loki from being reset, wanting to ‘recruit’ him to track down one of his variants (which we later find out is Sylvie). Mobius interrogates Loki, his goal is to break him down and get him to a point where he agrees to help the TVA — it’s a similar fashion to police interrogations that last hours to try and get a confession out of suspects, except Mobius here is using Loki’s file and role on the Sacred Timeline (according to the Time Keepers) to strip him down and make him more agreeable. (Since I began writing this, another blog has made a post that goes into more detail about this scene, so I’ll save my breath and encourage you to read @khapikat222’s own analysis of this scene!)
Mobius holds Loki’s life in his hands, he can have him reset at any moment… Of course Loki is going to agree to help them — and, of course, use the situation to his advantage by trying to gain the upper hand against his captors… But that’s another topic that I’ve discussed here and here!
“The first and most oppressive lie ever uttered was the song of freedom. For nearly every living thing, choice breeds shame and uncertainty and regret.” - Loki
Then we have Sylvie. Sylvie is a character who is rooted in anti-establishment politics and believes everyone should have free will. Sylvie is another victim of the system. After being captured and taken by the TVA as a child, she decided then she would make it her mission to destroy the organisation that stole her life.
Sylvie isn’t a hero, she isn’t a villain, she’s a revolutionary.
Sylvie grew up in apocalypses, having to raise, protect and teach herself. She grew up surrounded by death, only ever able to see the destruction of things and that shaped her own belief system. Sylvie believes that the only way to fight violence is with violence, because that’s what she’s had to live through and do to survive.
The TVA committed an act of violence on Sylvie’s life when they stole her from her timeline as a child. It wasn’t personal. It wasn’t targeted. It was systemic. And Sylvie, from her own experience, quickly understood that the only way to defeat violence is with violence.
Loki stated himself that he ‘doesn’t enjoy hurting people’ and does it ‘because he has to’, to maintain the ‘illusion’. This quote can be used as a heavy bit of foreshadowing for the plot and characters of the show. Mobius doesn’t enjoy hurting people, but he does it because he has to because that’s what the Time Keepers (He Who Remains) has demanded of him. Sylvie doesn’t enjoy hurting people but does it because she has to, to survive and fight back against a system that was designed to oppress her. We know Sylvie doesn’t enjoy hurting people as during Season 2 Episode 3, whilst attempting to kill Victor Timely, Sylvie says: “Do you think I want to do this? Any of this?” And then later says that she “can’t let him live”. In the end, Sylvie spares Victor. It’s clearly a difficult decision for her, going against everything that she believes, but she does it. She holds back.
Loki has used violence in the past as a way to assert control (both over his own life and others around him). For example, trying to destroy Jotunheim, bringing an army to Earth and trying to subjugate its people. Loki is certainly not a ‘peaceful protest’ kind of guy. However, Loki has learnt from his past that violence only seems to breed more violence, continuing the cycle. He has heard the (sanitised/biased) stories of Asgard and the wars across the Nine Realms and how the war may have been over, but the effects of it still remain. He has witnessed his own actions and the destruction it caused for a city, himself and his family. Loki was also stuck in a system on the Sacred Timeline, he understands it.
By the time Loki and Sylvie reach He Who Remains, Loki starts having doubts. Loki is willing to believe He Who Remains and factor in his reasoning for the TVA’s creation because Loki has always had to factor in everyone else’s moves on the chessboard. Sylvie, whilst she did spend years on her plan, is more impulsive when it comes to situations. Now, that isn’t to say Loki doesn’t have impulses — for example, his attempt to destroy Jotunheim felt more impulsive than planned due to the fact his emotions were erratic after finding out the truth of his heritage. However, Sylvie has such a strong belief that the system must be completely destroyed, and the dictator must be removed, that she is not willing to factor in the consequences. She is headstrong, independent and doesn’t trust anyone else but herself. I’d argue that Loki, whilst claiming to be independent, is very dependant on others, especially when it comes to his sense of self and his identity.
Plus, Loki has tried to be in the role of the dictator, he had ruled Asgard for a short time in ‘Thor’, and his attempt to subjugate Earth under the guise of liberation during ‘The Avengers’, whereas Sylvie has never had the chance to have the power to be in that position. Loki benefitted from hierarchical rule as a Prince of Asgard with his upbringing being in a palace and the title of ‘God of Mischief’, and he has been in a position that let him believe he was ‘above’ other beings — like mortals. Unlike Sylvie, Loki has experienced both sides of the coin with privilege and oppression. He benefited from the system, whilst also becoming a victim to it. This contributes as to why Loki can see how the system could be changed rather than simply torn down.
He Who Remains even tells Sylvie and Loki: “You may hate the dictator, but something... far worse is gonna fill that void if you depose of him.” He frames himself and the TVA as the ‘lesser of two evils’, which is typically something you’ll hear a lot when it comes to politics/governments and their leaders. This sort of rhetoric is essentially telling people not to hope or want for more, for something better. It is phrased as an ultimatum, yet, doesn’t leave the decider with much choice. Once again, it’s control via fear: fear of the unknown, of something worse, of something new. He Who Remains even tries to tempt the pair into taking over the system, using power as a means of persuasion.
Upon seeing the vastness of the multiverse and the potential consequences that could arise if he or Sylvie make the ‘wrong’ choice, Loki is hesitant to finish the mission. He entered the TVA as a prisoner, but also an opportunist as he planned to attempt to ‘overthrow the Time Keepers’, and by the end of S1, Loki evolves and takes in the scale of it all — “it isn’t about you”, as Sylvie told him in their first meeting. Sylvie, on the other hand, remained the same and held fast to her own mission. It was about her, yes, but it was also about the billions of people whose lives had been stolen or dictated by the TVA.
Loki is a reformist and Sylvie is a revolutionary. Both share the same goal of change, but want to reach said goal by different means.
Loki would prefer to transform the existing system, and in Season 2 opts for dismantling and rebuilding the TVA, because that’s what he’s witnessed from Asgard and Odin (or at least, that’s how it was framed to Asgard’s people in their history). Loki knows how it feels to have been lied to, to have your whole life be a lie, so he can sympathise with the TVA agents in a way that Sylvie struggles with. Sylvie knows the agents were variants, and whilst she can understand that they are victims themselves, she struggles to get past the mental barrier of how she views them being the enemy.
Sylvie told Loki: “it would be easier to burn this place down and start from scratch.” That’s revolutionary thinking. This is Sylvie stating her stance on what she thinks should happen to the structure that He Who Remains built. Again later on, she also told Loki “that sometimes it's okay to destroy something.” Sylvie didn’t want to simply ‘replace one nightmare with another’, she wanted to do a complete overhaul rather than just swap leaders — she rejects the existing system.
However, Loki tells Sylvie: “Sure. Burn it down. Easy. Annihilating is easy. Razing things to the ground is easy. Trying to fix what's broken is hard. Hope is hard.” This falls more in line with reformist ideology. Loki wants to change what already exists, something slower and more gradual with, ideally, little to no violence. Loki has tried using force and violence in the past to achieve his goal and it hasn’t worked for him. He even makes a dry comment to Sylvie about her machete, the weapon that killed He Who Remains: “Well, your machete hasn't solved any problems thus far.”
Loki doesn’t think violence is the answer. Sylvie does. However, both characters are eventually willing to try and understand each other and form a middle ground. Sylvie is willing to let Loki try and fix the Loom with the help of Victor Timely, and she is willing to put aside her own views for the sake of others. It isn’t easy nor is it smooth or without its clashes, but she tries. However, ultimately, she still believes that the TVA is “rotten” and “broken”, and that it needs to be dismantled.
To Sylvie, Loki is compromising with the system. She met Loki when he was dressed in TVA uniform, and then after the Citadel when he finds her on her branch, he is still wearing the uniform — just no longer with the ‘variant’ label on his jacket. Sylvie sees Loki as part of the problem, she sees him as a sympathiser/enabler. Loki is still playing He Who Remains’ game, existing within the rules of the system he set up, even after Sylvie freed the timelines. Sylvie sees trying to reform the TVA as repackaging the same product and selling it as something brand new and better.
However, by the end of Season 2, Loki’s stance and approach has shifted. At the start of the series, Loki states he believes that ‘freedom is a lie’, and that ‘choice breeds uncertainty’, but his actions in the shows finale represents his change in perspective. It can be debated whether Loki originally even truly believed that sentiment or not, but either way, his actions regarding freedom have changed. Loki realises that trying to fix a system that was always set up to fail its victims, a system that exists under He Who Remains’ rules and logic… It’s never going to work. There’s no room for anything other than ‘right or wrong’ in the system, and that isn’t true free will. So… Loki does what Sylvie had been telling him from the start… He dismantled the system by destroying the Loom.
The TVA was created to keep the ‘Sacred Timeline’ in check, to prune branches, to prevent true choice and free will. The Loom was the last part of He Who Remains’ structure/system that could lead to the TVA, as an entire organisation, reverting back to their old ways. Loki removed that possibility from the equation. Rogue agents who believed in the original mission may still remain (as shown in Deadpool & Wolverine), but the organisation as a whole cannot revert back so easily to their old practices because the whole reason they were pruning branches to begin with (keeping the Sacred Timeline/Temporal Loom stable) has been taken away.
Whilst the new TVA has changed their mission and now keep the branches safe, allowing people free will and choice, it is still a system that can be weaponised — like any system. However, now it has a better chance at being something better, with the dictator and his rules gone, it can now function as something closer to a true democratic society, not like the illusion He Who Remains created. The people of the TVA are the protectors of the multiverse, taking on the role that they believed the Time Keepers had, focusing on finding actually dangerous variants who threaten it all and appropriately dealing with them — instead of any old variant who created an innocent, tiny deviation unknowingly and treating them like a criminal.
Loki and Sylvie are both complex, nuanced characters that are capable of making wrong and right decisions. They are both capable of doing better and taking time to understand the other, to see both the small and big picture. Their dynamic was never going to be smooth sailing, they are both intrinsically different when it comes to power and control. Loki originally wanted to overthrow the Time Keepers and take their place, whereas Sylvie wanted to kill them and burn down their system. Loki wears his God status with pride, whilst Sylvie denounces her own. Loki accepts the hierarchy and has used it to his advantage in the past, whilst Sylvie challenges it and defies it…
Sylvie: “Sounds like, whatever we do, we’re playing God.”
Loki: “We are Gods.”
In the end, the show isn’t asking the audience to pick a side, to choose between reformism or revolutionism, it’s asking the audience to understand the arguments and explore the tension between the two characters — ‘why’ and ‘how’ these two characters got to where they are in their respective beliefs. It’s about change and how no-one is ‘truly good’ or ‘truly bad’, but it makes us question the morality and ethics of people and the systems they are a part of. It gives the hope that we can wish for better, and not settle for a system that ultimately harms us.
Indigenous lands are crucial for climate mitigation and resilience. Research shows their health is a direct result of Indigenous stewardship
While this isn't news to anyone who works in this space, it is useful to have this water-is-wet research to affirm that Indigenous knowledge and land management are extremely effective at storing carbon and protecting biodiversity.
I want to draw special attention to this part of the article:
New research shows that approach overlooks the key role that Indigenous knowledge and culture can play in mitigating climate change. It also reveals a dangerous misconception that has taken hold in global climate discussions: the idea that Indigenous lands are so rich because they are remote or sparsely populated.
Nothing could be further from the truth. The health of Indigenous lands and their ability to store vast quantities of carbon stem from the stewardship of the people who inhabit them.
I'm actually bringing this back around to say another important thing.
I get a fair number of asks and comments on my posts expressing sentiments like "human beings are a plague on this Earth", "humans ruin everything, we deserve to be wiped out", "humanity is inherently selfish, evil, and irredeemable".
I don't think the folks saying these things have bad intentions, I know their words come from a place of very understandable pain, fear, and anger. But to act as though humanity's impact on nature is inherently damaging and extractive is to erase thousands of years of Indigenous stewardship of nature. These ecosystems are thriving because there are humans living there.
This is your regular reminder that you don't need to feel guilty for being a human. You are part of nature--viewing humans as inherently separate from the rest of nature is actually part of the problem. You will be so much better served redirecting that guilt into supporting the humans who are helping nature or resisting those who are hurting it.
unconvinced i'll ever find "the vitamin" that makes me all better so i can get real work done but i do expect they'll elucidate whatever my deal was post-mortem, after which what i did manage to accomplish with my life will be regarded on the level of Beethoven composing despite being deaf or Gordon Ramsay cooking despite being british
Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
✓ Live Streaming✓ Interactive Chat✓ Private Shows✓ HD Quality✓ Free Actions
Free to watch • No registration required • HD streaming
Only a very small handful of MCU characters have firmly held roles on both sides of the hero/villain line. Off the top of my head I’m thinking Loki, Bucky, Wanda, and Nebula. Agatha…is kinda just doing her own thing. Not sure Taskmaster counts, unfortunately. Is there anybody I’m either forgetting or don’t know about in the first place because my MCU knowledge gets patchy post-Endgame?
Added thought: You realize that out of all of the Avengers (including his own brother) only the Hulk was able to do any real physical damage to him.
He got blown up by both Phil Coulson and Hawkeye. He was thrown out of a skyscraper window (do you realize how thick those windows are?) by Tony’s suit. He got his ass kicked by his big brother (who is also a demi-god and physically stronger). Not a single one of those events caused him any real physical harm. Not. A. Single. One.
It took the Hulk to draw blood, to bruise him. And even after that, he was only banged up a little. (Consider how capable he is of walking next to Thor at the end of the film.)
Why do I bring this up? Because it is clear that he is significantly worse off physically at the beginning than any other time in the film—including the Hulk-smash. There is no question that wherever he came from, he was going through physical torture (and I’d wager mental torture, too).
What did those aliens DO? If the Hulk smashed around a normal human they’d be cleaning you up with a napkin.
Hulk smash + Loki = some scratches and…light/moderate short term discomfort. Loki + Chitauri mystery torture = fear, flinching, limping, general ill appearance, exhaustion.
Or was it coming through the portal that messed him up? Or both.
I have scoured other sources trying to figure out what, exactly, the intent was with these opening Loki scenes and for the most part they don't say a thing. The screenplay I found doesn't say a thing about how haggard he looks:
The newer Avengers novelization, adapted by Alex Irvine, similarly doesn't say anything about Loki looking sick, although it does have one interesting detail:
Something overloaded, and a wave of energy rolled out from it, flashing across the skin of Fury, Hawkeye, and the assembled scientists. They flinched, but they also wanted to see what was going on...
When the energy faded, a man was left on the platform. He was on one knee with his head tucked into his chest, as if riding out a storm [emphasis mine]. In the silence, they approached him. The energy blast had scattered equipment and materials across the floor.
The man looked up at them and smiled as he stood. He was not a large man, not remarkable in any particular way. He had long black hair and wore black leather clothing, similar to what Fury was wearing. However, he wasn't a SHIELD agent. Fury didn't know where he had come from.
Also, the stranger held a kind of spear in his right hand. Set into its head, a gem glowed the same icy blue as the energy that had spilled from the Tesseract.
"Sir," Fury called as armed SHIELD agents closed nearer, "please put down the spear."
The man looked at the scepter as if he had only just noticed he had it. Then, slowly, he looked back up at Fury, and a vicious smile spread across his face.
The art book describes the scene like this:
And it shows this concept art of Loki looking even nastier, alongside a frame from the film of Loki looking...still pretty sick:
The art book does actually reference the above scene:
So in the art book we have Loki's "voice betraying audible strain" although that could be from unease/impatience considering the rest of that sentence is "as dark energy continues to build in the chamber, and then we actually do get "Barton helps a visibly weakened Loki into the back of the truck," which I think shows up literally nowhere except the film itself and this one description here. The thing that bugs me is that nowhere do they actually say why Loki is visibly weakened (it sure wasn't from very easily fighting off a few humans) or why concept art and the finished film both showed Loki looking pretty awful, although in different ways and to different degrees, when he first came through the portal.
There's maybe a clue here in the reference to dark energy, but you'd need another book entirely to get more info on that. Loki does say something to Thor about how Odin must have had to conjure an incredible amount of dark energy to send him to Earth, and the TDW prelude comic, which I think is still canon, adds that doing so took a massive physical toll on both Odin and Thor, such that Thor arrived unconscious. So if we're supposed to assume that Loki's use of the Tesseract also involved dark energy, then that maybe sort of implies he's so worn out purely from the journey--but it seems pretty ridiculous that you need, like, one and a half sources outside the actual film to know about that.
(interestingly, the art book also refers to dark energy in relation to Loki's possession of Clint, implying at the time that the scepter and Tesseract were meant to be related and nobody had any idea about the Infinity Stones, because that was retconned later...so it's also safe to say dark energy is just kinda whatever you want it to be.)
the art book has a couple other interesting things to say: "Loki is a pawn in a much larger game, manipulated by forces far more interested in the Tesseract's vast and heretofore untapped potential." some of what Tom's said in interviews about Loki's missing time between movies is echoed here too:
The original Avengers novelization, which I'm pretty sure is not technically considered canon, explicitly takes the stance that Loki is wrecked from portal travel:
(If you're thinking, hey, this looks interesting, perhaps it is a more nuanced take on Loki's motivations? It is not. Loki gets this one instance of mild sympathy from the narrator and then he's just a smirking, mustache-twirling Bad Guy.)
So all that to say...there is not a lot explaining what was meant by these scenes of Loki seeming genuinely ill after coming out of the portal, at least not from what I would consider to be truly reliable sources, but I have to very grudgingly admit that it does seem like the intent was probably just that he was in terrible shape because, somehow, the journey there by Tesseract through an unstable portal was that hard, because of reasons.
but here's the thing, the other interpretation makes at least as much sense, especially considering we actually have the one scene of the Other threatening and hurting him onscreen, which these extratextual sources all either skip over entirely or misrepresent. And--okay, I know I'm reaching here, because I could rant for days about how the What If writers don't know shit about canon, so it's hardly fair of me to use a What If plot point to back up an interpretation, but, Captain Carter somehow came through the same portal into the PEGASUS facility in a different timeline and she was completely fine. so there is also that. I would be perfectly, spitefully happy to use the What If writers' sloppiness as my own loophole in finding evidence for the interpretation I like.