Err, did I just enjoy that episode of Eastenders?
 I much admired the treatment Charlie Brooker gave to the recent shake-up of Eastenders in last nightâs instalment of his Weekly Wipe. It struck a chord with me in the way it first slammed then satirised the continuing drama of Walford, before noting surprise at how the writers have somehow recently âmade you care again about the charactersâ (Phil Mitchell aside, perhaps).
Central to the shake-up has been the well-publicised introduction of the Carter family. My interest was already piqued by the casting of Luisa Bradshaw-White as Shirley Carterâs sister, Tina. Â Luisa, as Kira in the 90s drama, This Life played in my view, one of the best feel-good characters created of that decade, and I sensed the potential for a lift to life in Walford, just from Luisaâs inclusion.Â
More interesting to me personally, was that Eastenders appeared to be making a renewed attempt at writing in LGBT characters, with Tina being softly revealed as a lesbian. As more Carters arrived, it was then very clear that Shirley and Tinaâs twinky nephew, Johnny was a closet gay himself, prompting a further spike in my renewed interest in the starkly beleaguered London soap.
 It was with a sense of trepidation however, that I involved myself in the mire of launderette lugubriousness and car lot consternation that Eastenders tends towards. After all, itâs not been riding high lately, but they didnât waste any time and the Carters have really got things moving. Johnny was outed within an episode or so of being introduced and in a scene so touching and tender, it seems surreal to contemplate that it involved Danny Dyer.
Despite being fast moving, it wasnât rushed or forced and the viewer was clearly given to understand that the Carter family had been building up to this revelation, with both parents seeing and choosing to ignore the clues and the compassionate sister, Nancy being in on the secret for some time. The context was of a family awakening to the prospect of a gay relative, with the twist of an accepting macho father and a cosseting mother with a more conflicted reaction. Linda is grieving for the son she had mentally planned for, a process so key to the story of many a childâs coming out, but perhaps often overlooked dramatically, as the focus pulls to the gay character. Mick meanwhile was there as the strength to face up to the reality for both himself and his son and assert that it doesnât change a thing. The storyline came out of human interest and emotional exploration of characters, not out of sensation or relationship scandal.
A similar approach is being taken with Ian and Deniseâs struggle to realise inevitably that theyâre not right for each other. I could be wrong, but it looks like Denise is exploring her emotional focus and context as she dallies with Fatboy again, just as Ian explores his, as he laments the absence of his most recent ex-wife, Jane, who put in an all too short surprise appearance to shake things up, the other night.
So often in the past, Eastenders has been drama for sensation, with little substance along the way, as Story Liners lurched from one Inside Soap headline to the next. There seemed little regard for maintaining a connection with the viewer, and where we had once cared about the lives of the Fowlers, the Beales the Watts and the Mitchells; the events of their lives at times vividly imprinting on our collective consciousness, it got to a stage where we could barely stand to watch Ronnie Mitchell crying again and any character with Moon as a surname could come and go without even leaving a shadow.
So, hooray for this upsurge in Walfordian effort and long may it continue, I wholeheartedly approve! And, may the treatment of LGBT storylines remain this well handled. As youâll see from my potted history of rainbow representation, whilst Eastenders led the way, itâs been a rough ride at times. Dominic Treadwell-Collins might perhaps want to think about having some âTâ at some time in the future â but Iâd advise him not to rush it. (And by that I mean, bring it in with the same care and attention that Johnny Carterâs storyline has had, through well-crafted, relatable characters and well-researched situations and dialogue)
From Colin to Johnny: A potted history of LGBT character portrayal in Eastenders
The Torchbearer Phase 1986-1991
First in 1986 we have the seminal soap gays. Although that phrase perhaps sounds grotty, one might say Colin and Barry actually represent a good clean start.
Middle class Graphic Designer meets cockney barrow boy against the backdrop of HIV/AIDS and rampant societal homophobia; the clashing of cultures [remember when EE used to have middle class characters?] and heads making for engaging and intense storylines at the core of the show. A peck on the forehead made headlines and people felt attitudinally as well as dramatically challenged.
There was a bit of a break from the gays after Colinâs final departure in 1989, until 1991, when Mark Fowlerâs Chef friend starts working for Ian Beale in his catering business. When itâs discovered that heâs HIV+ Joe is sacked cueing more issue-based ignorance for dramatic purposes. Whilst it was no My Beautiful Launderette, (how could it have been with Dot Cotton firmly in control of Walfordâs supply of Daz back then as now?) you might say gay story-lining in Eastenders was keeping its copybook clean.
Rushed and Neglected Phase 1994-2001
Again thereâs a break until 1994, when spurred on by the competition, in the form of Brooksideâs envelope-shoving lesbian kiss, the BBC decides to level the gender balance by having female gays for the first time. Unfortunately, unlike the competition they fail to root the characters of Della and Binnie in the show or give them anything interesting to do and after a little angst over coming out and a (much complained about) kiss in the middle of Bridge Street market, the couple are off to Ibiza and never seen again.
The next year, perhaps having learnt from their mistake with the lesbians, Eastenders try their hand at bisexuality, and confer the honour of being the soapâs first bi-guy on existing character Tony Hills; challenging his spectrum needle with the introduction of a gay brother for core character and Tonyâs girlfriend, Tiffany Raymond-Mitchell. After the big reveal, this couple was almost as badly neglected as its female predecessor, existing at the periphery of anything interesting. Tony occasionally bounced between genders and Simon mooched around being bitter and almost getting burnt to death and by 1999, they had run their course and were similarly packed off to go travelling.
Seemingly exhausted from their gay character failures yet perhaps feeling bound to pursue the homo strand as the wider millennial soap climate took on a more up-beat and inclusive air, (they even had a gay in Emmerdale by this time!) Eastenders story-liners didnât even appear to try as Dr Fred Fonseca was introduced to the soap, just prior to the Hills-Raymond departure. He came out, hung around with other peripheral characters and a after minimal amount of homophobic pressure from Martin Fowler of all people, realised that the East End wasnât for him and sought a more accepting community in Islington â Thank you, Mr Blair.
Mature But Dull Phase 2001-2005
âSpin me a golden thread on the theme of âolder gaysââ, John Yorke, executive producer (mightâve) said to the to the scriptwriters toiling in their tower, and without the aid of Rumplestiltskin, in 2001 they finally managed a successful character for TV stalwart Ian Lavender by the name of Derek. Billeting him with Pauline may have helped cure Martinâs queer-bashing tendencies, but did nothing to ensure heâd hang around forever and after four years of arguments and a conviction for marijuana farming, he was reunited with his children and gone, heralding the dark years for LGBT representation in the waters of the cockney soap cauldron.
The Desperate Phase 2005-2008
To use another grotty phrase worthy of the grot they were to serve up, Eastenders must have sensed âa gay-shaped holeâ in their character line-up after Derekâs departure in 2005, and having had such bad luck with new characters thought theyâd once again bestow the honour of same-sex doings on an existing one. However, instead of sensitively selecting a teen with a developing identity, or an adult who had shades of the enigmatic, they plumped to bring Sapphic intrigue into the life of adenoidal former trumpet-player and all-round character-cushion, Sonia Fowler. To paraphrase another who liked to trumpet a load of rubbish, where once there was harmony, there was discord and where once there was truth, there was error. The storyline would have been no more unthinkable had it been written about the Iron Lady herself. (At least she had that gay-hating thing going on, so common to many who later turn out to be flamers themselves!) By 2007, Sonia had been restored to the downtrodden hetero pursuits befitting a member of the Fowler family and having reunited with Martin, as is customary, left for Manchester.
After SoniaGate, like a child scolded, Eastenders scowled and sniped from the corner of the room in the direction of LGBT writing, including peripheral gays in the form of queeny stereotype, Marco Bianco, (Peggy Mitchellâs Interior Designer friend) and Councillor Edward Tunstal, the latter being predominantly used within a âhilariousâ oops-Iâm-not-actually-gay storyline for Ian Beale, (Isnât gay funny!) before being involved in a scandal with a young man and stepping down. (Isnât gay disgusting) Yes, Eastenders appeared to be taking writing tips from the Daily Mail.
In 2007, they also had another go at turning an existing character, bringing back Ian Bealeâs (not) son Steven with a new head, which didnât know if it was good or evil, mad or sane, straight or gay, interesting or boring. Before fully making up its mind either way on any point, it headed to the Tube Station and hasnât been seen since.Â
No Big Deal Phase â 2008 - Present
By 2008, it was time for Eastenders to grow up and grow a pair, if youâll permit a bit more grot, and the following year it appeared that they had, when they introduced Christian Clarke, an out and proud gay brother for Jane Beale. A fag for hag, Roxy Mitchell, a gym bunny and a frequenter of Vauxhall clubs, Christian appeared real and convincing, until they gave him a more permanent love interest that is. âChryedâ was popular in some quarters and certainly made for issue-based drama redolent of the Colin and Barry years, but to me Christian and his weak and self-hating Muslim boyfriend were never a credible partnership. I could never see the superficial, partying muscle queen go for the shrimpy, directionless, complicated mess that was Syed Masood.Â
Nevertheless, âChryedâ was no Della and Binnie by any stretch, and it seemed by the time their story ended â with a brief shake to their relationship courtesy of enigmatic bisexual businessman, Danny Pennant â that Eastenders was out of the LGBT character doldrums. Indeed, the aforementioned Mr Pennant remains and develops slowly and for once without immediate angst and heartache, charming the birds â and the blokes, Johnny Carter included.