Existential Theory| Rollo May
Existentialism is the best word to define Rollo May's beliefs. According to Merriam-Webster Dictionary existentialism is a “examination of individual existence in an incomprehensible universe, as well as the dilemma of the person who must bear ultimate responsibility for acts of his own act. In other words, it is the individual who is responsible for their own life, not other factors; one must remember that they are responsible for all acts and not to separate oneself from what is essential. Understanding one's own existence, according to an existentialist, is the key to transformation. Being a part of this reality and understanding the discomfort that can result from it are basic existentialist concepts which ultimately the reason why I chose Rollo May's theory as the basis for my paper. Self-actualization is the central theme of existential psychology. It is the people's struggle to work with their life experiences and grow into more fully human beings. When a person has anxiety because of these life events, it's possible that they're experiencing it in one of the "three separate but overlapping aspects of, or modes of being in the world." The human being, according to Rollo May, was not a sum of his or her parts, but a being that was continually becoming and always existing. This was a significant departure from previous psychiatric techniques, and it restored the individual's humanity and empathy.
Self-actualization has become a curiosity of mine, and as a result, I see myself pulling toward the idea of applying self-actualization to Rollo May's principles. The older I become, the more I realize how unique I am, and how the chance of not being a part of this world exists. I recognize that creating realistic goals and always developing myself is not just my destiny, but also the destiny of my family. Everyone, I believe, believes that the universe revolves around them and that he or she is at the center. “Freedom is man's potential to participate in his own development,” Rollo May would explain. It's our ability to shape ourselves.” I agree with both and have been attempting to find a common ground. We all think that to grow, people must take responsibility for their actions. An individual should make mistakes, experience worry over them, and learn from them. People, in my opinion, should be aware of their failings and, if necessary, experience rock bottom.
In terms of the gap, some academics were opposed to the entrance of existential philosophy into psychology, fearing that it would make the discipline less tangible. May, on the other hand, believed that philosophy and science should go hand in hand. Furthermore, he considered it was extremely dangerous for science to ignore philosophy.
Is Existential Philosophy acceptable in Scientific Psychology and Psychotherapy? May saw that it helped the area of science, but not necessarily the individual, in an age when science had grown preoccupied on analyzing, codifying, and treating diseases. May, on the other hand, believed that psychology and psychotherapy should prioritize the person.
What is the role of existential philosophy in psychoanalysis? May advocated the idea of combining psychoanalysis and existentialism to observe the individual in his social environment rather than seeing him as a disconnected object unaffected by his surroundings. In some ways, existentialism evolved at a pivotal point in history, when personality was being degraded and broken, and Western civilization was at its most degrading and dividing. It's easy to take this comprehensive perspective for granted in today's world. Buddhism, Hinduism, Ayurveda, yoga, and Eastern spirituality are all prevalent. May was a man ahead of his time since they were fresh and revolutionary belief systems in the early twentieth century. The method of Rollo May demonstrates the importance of the man and his experiences.
