Unleash the inner fangirl

Spider-Man and Superman stuck under a bunch of rubble. Superman is weakened, forcing Spider-Man to hold up the makeshift roof, or they’ll both be crushed. Things get worse when the Kryptonite Bomb is thrown into the rubble to weaken Superman and the Symbiote moves onto the unconscious Superman, forcing him to become Venom-Superman and attack Spider-Man. The culprits behind the attack are Green Goblin (Norman Osborn) and Lex Luthor. Both Green Goblin and Lex Luthor sent their henchmen - Doomsday, Taskmaster, Deathstroke, Brainiac, Kraven the Hunter, Doctor Octopus, Electro, Rhino, Parasite and Amazo to attack the heroes in an ambush. The Supervillains spent their time on the sidelines, observing the fight between Spider-Man and the Symbiote-possessed Superman. However, the tables are turned when Superman manages to shake the Symbiote off. The sight of Superman defeating the Symbiote causes the henchmen to flee, leaving Green Goblin and Lex Luthor at the mercy of the heroes.

A lot of prison abolition frameworks rely on what we know about how societies met their own and each others needs before currency. So, if someone needed milk, they'd take eggs from their chicken and trade it with the person who has a cow. This ensured that everyone's physical needs were usually met.

Prison abolitonists won't say it, but their idea of how rape should be handled is exactly how these early agricultural societies handled it. It was a "majority rules" system. Meaning, if the community liked the women more, the man would be ousted or punished. And if the community liked the man more, the woman would be ousted or punished.

The general goal of prison abolition is not a society in which everyone is safe and has their individual needs met. It's a society that's stable and can maintain itself, where most people have their physical needs met enough to reproduce and continue the society.

This is why they can never give you a straight answer. Because the prison abolition framework doesn't aim to abolish rape, it aims to keep it as quiet as possible. Their solution is to keep men only raping their own wives and daughters, and for those women and girls to have enough other needs met that they'll shut up about it for fear of not having those other needs met.

Most prison abolitionists do not actually understand their framework, because they don't read the academic sources and they don't know how their ideal society would function. But the academics know exactly what it would look like, and it's a regressive society where instead of a justice system making prisons to keep the violent men contained, each household has a woman to keep that household's men contained.

Like it or not, a lot of the historical gains made for women's freedom have come from the penal system. A husband is no longer the untouchable iron fist of the law within his own home, an outside force can step in and stop him from beating his wife and children to a pulp. They can lock him away where he'll never hurt anyone again. That's revolutionary. It took until 1993 for marital rape to become illegal in the US, but it still happened. A woman can freely say no to sex with her husband and seek legal recourse if he rapes her. Again, revolutionary.

“Well, it hardly matters now. Your turn.”