#wunderpantry

Imagine: you're the chairperson of Kolkata's hospitality committee and you just received word from new Mayor Sovan Chatterjee that Justin Timberlake will be visiting your city on his upcoming press tour. What will you serve for dinner?

If you're anything like Chef Gardner* and Mayor Robert Morris, you'll serve the most recherché ingredients you can get your sticky fingers on: truffles, ornamented Westphalia hams, stewed terrapin*, and larded sweet bread. You'll present a soup course with three soups, a fish course with three fish, a boiled course*, a roast course (containing cow, sheep, goose, turkey, bear, and castrated roosters), and a cold dishes course*. At this point, your guests might assume you're just about to wind down to cheeses and melons—but not you, you have over 25 more plates in store—you're only just getting started. Your entrées will require subtitles: macaroni à la Italienne (Italian-style macaroni); vol-au-vent, aux huîtres (oyster pies); and petites pâtés à la Bechamelle [sic] (small gravy patties). You'll spur gout sufferers to relapse with your battery of veal kidneys in Madeira wine, bread-crumbed mutton chops au jus, and larded beef filets. And still, there's the matter of dessert: all manner of puffs, pies, pastries, puddings and something called Madeira jelly. And none of this mentions the edible set-pieces: the pyramids of crystallized candy, spanish macaroni, and other assorted sweetmeats towering in the corner, double-dog-daring each guest to come and take a bite.

Conspicuously absent* from the bill of fare however are vegetables and fresh fruit. Produce only appears as a garnish or gravy: sorrel; olives; peas; and tomato, caper, and celery sauces (this is a comprehensive list). Though fresh fruit is out of the question due to the Februaryness of the banquet (apples do turn up in the puffs, coconuts in the candy, and cranberries in the pies). In the book Delmonico's, Lately Thomas writes, "Literary and promiscuous describes this agglomeration of things good and dreary to eat. The keynote was abundance—profusion—over-abundance —a prodigality of edibles, crudely grouped and offering little basic variety. No one could sample everything, and no one was expected to; Falstaff would have belched at the challenge."

The 1842 Dickens dinner was the Pirates of the Caribbean: At Worlds End of tendered banquets. It was a spectacular blockbuster that reveled in how blockbustery it could be*. It was was an over-produced hodge-podge of oddly arranged ingredients, a pastiche of confused sources, a maze of throw-away tangents and no clear transition between its major components. The guests* finished the event feeling stuffed yet never fully satisfied and were left wondering what it was that they just spent several hours doing.

The banquet itself may seem ghastly to a modern eater but it was the very archetype of fine American dining in its day and its hosts were heavily congratulated on pulling off such a lavish feast. An account printed the following day in the New York Herald states that Dickens "was in high spirits, laughed heartily, ate heartily, drank wine with . . . Washington Irving, the Mayor and…everybody that asked him, and that was over a hundred." Indeed, Dickens was outwardly grateful for such a warm reception and gave every indication that he relished his dinner in New York and tour of the U.S. But then he returned to England and wrote two scathing and somewhat bilious books set in America, Martin Chuzzlewit, and American Notes. This is how Chuzzlewit describes the particulars of a New York Dinner, one that seems suspiciously familiar:

All the knives and forks were working away at a rate that was quite alarming; very few words were spoken; and everybody seemed to eat his utmost in self-defense, as if a famine were expected to set in before breakfast time to-morrow morning…The poultry…disappeared as rapidly as if every bird had…flown in desperation down a human throat. The oysters, stewed and pickled, leaped from their capacious reservoirs, and slid by scores into the mouths of the assembly…Great heaps of indigestible matter melted away as ice before the sun. It was a solemn and an awful thing to see. Dyspeptic individuals bolted their food in wedges; feeding, not themselves, but broods of nightmares, who were continually standing at livery within them. Spare men, with lank and rigid cheeks, came out unsatisfied from the destruction of heavy dishes, and glared with watchful eyes upon the pastry…[There remained a single] comfort—it was very soon over.

[cue record scratch]

Twenty-six years elapsed before Dickens returned to America. In that time, the U.S. grew by seven territories and nine states. The ticking cogs of industrialization had rolled out of the Northeast via channels carved from telegraph wires and railroad ties. The U.S. had wrestled Texas away from Mexico and at one dark point even operated as two separate governments. In the time since Dickens last set foot on an American gangplank, the country had gone through puberty. Had the culinary scene grown up as well? Would Dickens be welcomed back after making such ungenerous observations (at best) and spiteful sneers (at worst)? And why would he even want to rear his head in the place he lampooned so severely? The answers are yes, yes, and money—Justin Timberlake had grown in popularity in the intervening years, but so too had Kolkata.

When Dickens arrived in New York in 1867, he was sick, secretly broke, and two years away from death. He was also more celebrated than ever and his American hosts were eager for a do-over, after all, the international perception of American fine dining would be at stake. The storied Delmonico's Restaurant, then the finest dining establishment North America, now a culinary legend, was chosen as the location for the extravaganza. The fate of the New York hospitality industry would be left in the hands of Delmonico's chef de cuisine, the great Charles Ranhofer*.

If abundance was the keyword of the 1842 dinner, refinement* was the word of 1868. Where the first dinner had sixty-odd, incongruous plates, the second featured a heavily-edited menu of thirty. Dishes like quartiers d'artichauts Lyonnaise (artichokes), épinards au velouté (spinach soup), and petits pois à la Anglaise (English peas) are still just as intricate as their '42 predecessors, but they also mark a return to vegetables, and offer a balance not found in the Atkins-tastic first dinner. Lately Thomas chronicles some other major improvements,

Symmetry has been imposed upon variety, the meal charted along a definite line of development; it is no longer a superfluity of abundance. The sauces contain shadings that the palate could catch...The clumsy crutch of two languages has been thrown aside, for New York's educated diners had passed that primer stage. There are a multitude of literary allusions…a soup named for Dumas, chopped lamb à la Walter Scott, grouse à la Fenimore Cooper…timbales à la Dickens...And not only are the diners carried by easy transitions from course to course, they are so wafted in a way to reanimate flagging appetite. The concluding stages, especially, are beyond the scope of the simple pastries of 1842, when two versions of that insipidity, blanc mange ("rose color" and "almond"), were a pale alternative to repetitious "puffs,"…and "plum puddings, blazing." "Madeira jelly" would melt with confusion before "corbeille de biscuits Chantilly" (1868), and those jolly "apple puffs" would be country cousins beside "lait d'amandes rubané au chocolat"

While waiters poured sherrys, champagnes and perfect coffees and the guests enjoyed confections by the ones, twos, threes, and petit fours, Dickens arose to say a few words. Would he renew his negative opinions? Would he pretend he never had them in the first place? Or would he just talk about his latest book and why everyone in the room should buy four copies?

With the poise of Lady Dedlock and polish of Dr. Marigold, Dickens addressed his audience and apologized for his prior behavior,

"…on my return to England…[I resolve] to record that wherever I have been [in America], in the smallest places equally with the largest, I have been received with unsurpassable politeness, delicacy, sweet temper, hospitality, consideration, and with unsurpassable respect for the privacy daily enforced upon me by the nature of my avocation here and the state of my health. [Applause.] This testimony, so long as I live, and so long as my descendants have any legal right in my books, I shall cause to be republished as an appendix to every copy of those two books of mine in which I have referred to America. [Tremendous applause.]

The event was a smashing success. As a critic later pointed out, the guest of honor had eaten crow for dinner even though it was not on the menu. Four days later, Dickens left for England just as I.R.S. G-men were about to nab him for not declaring $180,000 in income from his American book tour.

[Record scratch resolves to Bourne Identity style techno music]

Whereas the 1842 Dickens dinner was the story of Charlie and the Cheesecake Factory, the follow-up was something more like Charlie and Glass Elevator full of French Laundry. A critical adjustment was underway, not only was the New York culinary scene maturing, so too was the scrappy country known as the United States.

__

Footnotes

A highly-regarded caterer of his time, but not so highly regarded that his first name is locatable via the usual modern methods.

Turtle!

Does "boiled beef à la mode" mean what I think it means?

A cold hare patty sounds like something I would fish out of a shower drain. I'd rather eat oysters in aspic jelly and I have a shellfish allergy.

A further indication of the over-the-top, not quite thought-out atmosphere of the banquet can be found in the twelve marble busts that decorated the room: (two founding fathers, four of history's greatest Romantic poets, two famous Roman orators, two deities, a Supreme Court Justice, and—the guest of honor, Charles Dickens.)

From a modern perspective at any rate. Or, on second thought, maybe not.

And what of Dickens' many groupies? Were they allowed to dine with the assembly? According to Thomas, no. The men "were honored by the semipresence of a number of ladies, who sat in a group around Mrs. Dickens and through the open door of an anteroom were permitted to witness the festivities as far as was consistent with propriety." [Delmonico's]

This is also the tale of two Charleses. Chef Charles Ranhofer would go on to invent Lobster Newberg, popularize Baked Alaska, and introduce U.S. diners to a buttery fruit known as the alligator pear (which is today called the avocado*)—the 1868 Dickens dinner was the Timberlake of literature meeting the Timberlake of cuisine.

* a replacement name that sounds much more benign until a friend of yours points out that avocado comes from the nahuatl word for testicle.

And what of the decor? Did the same head-scratching busts preside over this second dinner? Thankfully no, though a New York World reporter does mention that, "Confections were converted into…tempting pictures of the most familiar characters of the great novelist…Sairy Gamp and Betsy Frig and Poor Joe and Captain Cuttle blossomed out of charlotte russe, and Tiny Tim was discovered in pâté de foie gras."

__

Sources

Bennett, James Gordon. "The Grand Literary, Fashionable, Legal, Judicial and Miscellaneous Dinner to Boz on Friday Night, at the City Hotel." The New York Herald. Feb. 20 1842.

Dickens, Charles. Speeches, Letters, and sayings of Charles Dickens. New York, 1870.

Dickens, Charles. The Life and Adventures of Martin Chuzzelwit. New York, 1884.

Kitton, Frederic. Charles Dickens: His Life, Writings, and Personality. London, 1902.

Thomas, Lately. Delmonico's: A Century of Splendor. Boston: Houghton Mifflin Company, 1967.