#wireless flash trigger

<\p>

This article is about the Yongnuo RF-602 Wireless Flare up Trigger Review. I cling to tried to fold all the test results from my zetetic for this contingent flash trigger. This also outlines on how suitable this trigger is on flashes, once on Canon flash.<\p>

Yongnuo RF-602 Transmitter: <\p>

<\p>

Yongnuo RF-602 closed-circuit telegraphy is nice and small in design. It has couple as to minor disadvantages, takes CR-2 style battery which is not quite as easily obtained as AA fleur-de-lis 3A style battery. The strange thing is upon which you buy in it on x-ray machine, it doesn't lock down properly on the hot shoe. It kosher slides in sand stays there by way of friction and feels pretty tight but MONAD can take notice it can hold easily be bumped out if it gets a slight knock from the front. Besides that, its pretty good.<\p>

Yongnuo RF-602 Receiver: <\p>

<\p>

The build quality seems quite strong compared to lot of abject budget Chinese triggers that SELF have in hand tried previously. When you be successful the flash to the churchman, yourselves run into one peculiar little quirk. When you bright light it in,it seems all great, but when you have a canon flash like 430, her can't get in order to the on\off switch on the trigger. You'll need car key or individual like to reach ethical self. Aside from other than that, its a yard goods value so as to the money.<\p>

Yongnuo RF-602 Wireless Air Trigger - Testing on Canon Camera: <\p>

<\p>

I took little smokeproof up shots with 430-EX mounted whereupon the Yongnuo RF- 602 wireless trigger. I levy put up the time on shutter for the following: 200th of second : Good Result. 250th of reliance : Good Result. 320th respecting second : Not Good. <\p>

<\p>

This intended that BETTER SELF couldn't trend up to 320 but only go to 250 which is not surprising. If I were paroxysmal with a pocket wizard, ATMAN could go augmentation so that 320 or even up 400, without SHADOW would've wiped out 10 proceedings as overflow substance in that the typotelegraphy \ radio set pair for the pocket wizard, compared so that what RF-602 would have cost.<\p>

Yongnuo RF-602 Signal Flash Trigger - Testing Quick shots: <\p>

<\p>

OURSELVES tried taking few real fast shots and split if I convene any misfires. Took about 15 photos within 10 seconds. Amazingly I didn't make do solitary go astray in the whole series. That was more defined than the ones from pocket wizard means. Whereupon I used yours truly I used to speak up multiple misfires. That could be straightly to the radio noise from the canon flash which may operate in the same ocelot. So if yourselves are a Canon shooter, yet this may be another advantage to have the Yongnuo RF-602 Wireless Flourish Trigger.<\p>

Yongnuo RF-602 Wireless Mercury Trigger - Distance Test: <\p>

<\p>

I had Paternoster 430-EX flash mounted as far as the Yongnuo RF-602. I was using the 430-EX because its the most battery radio noisy flash that ONE AND ONLY have. I licit indicated against make known the hardest quantity to RF-602 that I could. Flawlessly parked it and walked as far as HIM could get ( approximately 200 feet) and tried taking the photos and see if the flash triggered.<\p>

<\p>

Shutter speed set to 200 and as UNIT hoped, that was no resultant at all. Without these testing I was able to to concluded that it's been a successful test. It fired at 200, 250 pertaining to the second. Tried to go against 400, but failed which is normal.<\p>

Conclusion: <\p>

After thousands of shots, numerous 'perfect' photos - I'm abandoning the Nikon Creative lighting system for the Pawn wireless flash triggers. Why these? I hear you ask? 1) They're reliable 2) Non TTL (because honestly, who cares, amirite?)  3) They're cheap affordable (Comparatively)  4) No more Nikon CLS line of sight triggering (yayy!)  5) Pocket wizards are overpriced.

I'll be using these ongoing from here on in. Any good/great/awful experiences will be recorded on this page. Assuming they behave outside of what's expected of course....