Yeah, what IS your âtheoryâ?! (pt. 2)
It doesnât take a psychic to figure that Ernestâs (ViggleTips) âtheoryâ about product rewards and âthe end of the weekâ amounts to something like, âI think rewards will return once the new business quarter starts October 1.â He essentially said as much today:
Okay, so let me get this straight:
1) Ernest, who forever has told us to ânot think too much about these thingsâ and not to âspeculate,â is now theorizing and speculating?!
2) Why in the FUCK, after just yesterday deleting SEVEN comments that spoke WITH INTELLIGENCE and ACTUAL, REAL FINANCIAL INFORMATION, does he allow THIS nonsense to remain AND comment on and seemingly support it?!
3) The first comment is one of the most uninformed, nonsensical things meant to sound smart and business-minded Iâve ever read, and trust me, I taught undergraduate college students for four years so Iâve read some real bullshit in my time.
âThey needed to boost their quarter projection income.â
First of all, limiting rewards awarded last quarter (July 1 - September 30) would affect that quarter, NOT âprojectionâ (next quarter) and certainly NOT âincome.â Product rewards are an expense that, if limited, would affect/help the bottom line, ie: net PROFIT (by limiting expenses relative to âincome,â or more accurately ârevenue,â the money coming into the company).
(Perhaps thatâs what the commenter was trying to get across....they limited rewards to inflate their quarterly (7/1-9/30) numbers, but thatâs the sort of deception you canât fall back on too many times, and investors see right through it.)
Therefore, bringing back rewards actually HURTS âquarter projection incomeâ (for October 1 - December 31.) Even if we give the commenter the benefit of the doubt, bringing back rewards sometime after tomorrow only serves to put Viggle into the position when it comes time to report next quarterâs number in December that they hoped to avoid last quarter. (In fact, because of the backlog of unredeemed points, they stand to look much worse on paper in 3 months than they otherwise would have.)
Third, the lack of rewards last quarter ALSO negatively impacts next quarterâs âprojection incomeâ in that as users become frustrated with the app and the company, the slack off and in some cases stop using the app altogether. Which is important because....
Fourth, âincomeâ for Viggle comes from the advertisers, not the users redeeming rewards. They MAKE money when we watch advertisements and it COSTS them money when we redeem our points. (To that point, it serves them in some way too if a lot of users with a large number of points earned give up and never redeem them. In those cases theyâve already earned the money from the ads those users viewed but never have to pay out, which means sometimes the occasional rewards drought actually benefits their bottom line, but I donât want to get anyone confused by explaining too much at one time.)
In short, the comment in question makes absolutely no sense from even an elementary business perspective.
YET ERNEST JUST ATE THAT SHIT UP. Because it was positive. Because it was in line with what he already wanted to believe and was in the exact opposite vein of the comments he didnât like and had deleted.
Ernest is a tool. A Polyanna. Even if product rewards DO come back, heâs completely blind to the realities over at Viggle.