A refute to LooneyCapricorns 'proof' that we live in a Matriarchy; An original piece by Jack McArdle
http://www.theguardian.com/society/2010/sep/05/men-victims-domestic-violence
This first link a Guardian Article into domestic abuse claiming that 40% of the victims are men. Two points;
1. Other than naming the body claiming to have conducted this reasearch, no sources are provided
2. It does not say how many of these cases involve male perpetrators. This does not support the idea of a matriarchy, as it is therefore certain that over 60% of cases are committed by men.
On top of this, the idea that men are weak is a problem with gender roles. Your first article is anti-patriarchy and pro-feminist, you tool.
http://newyork.gotnewswire.com/news/woman-gets-probation-after-assaulting-%E2%80%98pervy%E2%80%99-teen-drone-pilot
Second link, claiming that the woman received a light sentence in a case of female on male violence. This article simply states what time she served and insinuates this is lax without comparison. Your claim that it 'should have been 30 days' goes by the idea that all perpetrators are sentenced to the maximum jail sentence. This article is therefore evidence that women are sentenced, neither pro-MRA nor anti-MRA. Moot point.
http://newyork.gotnewswire.com/news/woman-gets-probation-after-assaulting-%E2%80%98pervy%E2%80%99-teen-drone-pilot
Third and Fourth links, only included the fourth as they are near identical. This article simply states a woman assaulted a man who was spying on her. She was sentenced to probation for this. There is no suggestion that a man would have been sentenced differently for 1st degree aggravated assault. This article is neither pro-MRA or Anti-MRA. Moot point again.
Again, you ignored the point and did not prove anything more than your inability to source.
You are wrong. There is not matriarchy. You even posted the statistic thatĀ over 60% of domestic violence cases areĀ committedĀ by men.Ā The actual figure is probably much higher as cases are not reported. And yes, I can actually source my claims.
Eat it, you harpy.