Recently, one of Oliver Clegg’s “works” came to my attention again.
It left me with deep pain and sadness.
I have no intention of blaming the person who posted it, nor those who informed me. But—
Please take a moment to imagine:
What if a photo you love—of something, someone, or some animal you hold dear—
was traced without permission, presented as someone else’s artwork, renamed, and
spread further by well-meaning people, ultimately generating income for someone else?
This is not just between me and him. It could happen to any of us, at any time, with someone like him.
I have consulted a lawyer specializing in international copyright through a project supported by Japan’s Agency for Cultural Affairs.
I understand some people still say “it’s not a big deal.”
That is exactly why I’d like to share a few facts:
His actions are tracing, which is different from imitation or reference.
At least for my photo, this cannot be considered fair use.
His website is accessible from Japan, and therefore infringes upon Japanese copyright.
My rights are protected internationally under the Berne Convention.
I am not trying to stop anyone from appreciating his work.
But I do want the facts to be recognized.
Oliver Clegg is still clearly and deliberately violating both the law and the rights of individuals.
As those who follow my work may know, neither of my cats is named “Rocky.”
I have identified at least seven of his images as traced.
On April 30th (JST), I informed his gallery and requested an investigation.
I sent a follow-up on May 3rd, asking for a response by the end of business on May 6th (local time).
To date, I have received no reply.
Perhaps they believe the words of a Japanese blogger are not worth acknowledging.
So be it.
Let me be clear: I am not seeking compensation or an apology.
All I want is for people to understand that this is a repeated pattern of appropriation.
Among the seven traced works:
One is my own photo.
One is the work of Staice Shitanda, as shared with me.
One is a Getty-managed image. If that is the only image he sought permission for, it would suggest a disregard for individual rights.
One is a published book image.
One comes from a private blog, even if it later became a meme.
One appears across Pinterest and social media, but originates from an individual's SNS post.
One features a well-known Japanese cat, for which I personally contacted their official in 2023 and was told they had never been approached by Clegg.
These images all match in composition and linework, and cannot reasonably be considered imitation or reference.
While I will not repost the artwork or comparison images here, I am prepared to share my documentation with media or art professionals who wish to investigate further.
Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
✓ Live Streaming✓ Interactive Chat✓ Private Shows✓ HD Quality✓ Free Actions
Free to watch • No registration required • HD streaming
Top Posts Tagged with #unauthorized artwork | Tumlook