Another look and feel/UI test!

#dc#dc comics#batman#batfamily#batfam#dick grayson#dc fanart#bruce wayne#tim drake


seen from China

seen from United States
seen from China
seen from China
seen from China

seen from Norway

seen from Serbia
seen from France

seen from United Kingdom

seen from France
seen from Türkiye
seen from South Korea
seen from China
seen from United States
seen from China
seen from Norway
seen from Malaysia

seen from United States
seen from Germany

seen from Malaysia
Another look and feel/UI test!

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch ⢠No registration required ⢠HD streaming
Trial ui test:D
no this isn't the background i'm using, im planning on drawing it myself but idk how to draw backgrounds :(
Discover how UI/UX testing addresses common challenges such as usability issues, inconsistent design elements.
What common challenges does UI/UX testing solve?
UI/UX testing solves common challenges such as usability issues, inconsistent design elements, difficult navigation, and low user satisfaction, ultimately improving overall user experience and product success.
(via https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rmKbsQ41wVY)
Testing with mocks
I love Objective-C. Swift is also wonderful, but Objective-C is spectacular.
One thing I miss from Objective-C is dynamic patching. It was wonderful for mocking behaviors in testing. OCMock was awesome. And when Iāve found OHHTTPStubs I couldnāt stop myself to add it to all my projects.
Swift is far more protective. Ok, itās true since Swift app runs inside the Objective-C runtime, is possible to manipulate the dispatching of messages at runtime. And I think thatās for the better. Letās remove OCMock and OHHTTPStubs from the cart file and letās think how we can mock using Swift. Because mock is absolutely necessary.
Mocking the network
Perhaps, the canonical example for mocking is networking. To test against the Net is hard, expensive, and it could slow tests a lot. Letās revisited, for instance, func fetchCurrentWeatherData(input:completionHandler:) from the weather app.
Sure, we could call it from the test suite, and we can inject an URL to make it fail, and then, a point the task to an URL that makes it pass.
let task = session.dataTask(with: request) { (data: Data?, _: URLResponse?, error: Error?) in guard error == nil else { let networkError = NetworkControllerError.forwarded(error!) let payload = Either<NetworkControllerError, WeatherData>.left(networkError) completionHandler(payload) return } guard let jsonData = data else { let payloadError = NetworkControllerError.invalidPayload(url) let payload = Either<NetworkControllerError, WeatherData>.left(payloadError) completionHandler(payload) return } self.decode(jsonData: jsonData, endpointURL: url, temperatureUnit: input.unit, completionHandler: { (result: Either<NetworkControllerError, WeatherData>) in completionHandler(result) }) } task.resume()
Obviously, it will take a lot of time to make the trips to the server, we would be loading its load, and besides, there is a principle at stake. Arenāt we supposed to be doing Unit Test? Well, if thatās the case, by doing something like
func testOpenWeatherMap() { let exp = expectation(description: "Get weather data") let controller = OpenWeatherMapNetworkController() let input = Input(location: "Campana", unit: TemperatureUnit.metric) controller.fetchCurrentWeatherData(input: input) { (result: Either<NetworkControllerError, WeatherData>) in switch result { case .left: XCTFail("no data returned by fetchWeatherData()") case .right(let data): let city = input.location print("Weather in \(city): \(data.condition), \(data.temperature)\(data.unit)") exp.fulfill() } } waitForExpectations(timeout: 10, handler: nil) }
We would be testing two things, the network, and the function itself. Not one, but two. The word āUnitā is no longer applicable.
We need to abstract the actual network interactions. At the very basic, we need to inject our own closure for func dataTask(with request:completionHandler:) -> URLSessionDataTask. Obviously, we can subclass URLSession to introduce our own version of the method. But, we also need to mock URLSessionDataTask, to hijack the whole interaction. Letās mock URLSessionDataTask first.
class MockURLSessionDataTask: URLSessionDataTask { // I know, against Apple naming convention, // but I rather have the `Mock` part right on front // to prevent autocompletion to introduce errors. private let closure: () -> Void init(closure: @escaping () -> Void) { self.closure = closure } override func resume() { self.closure() } }
Pretty self-explanatory. We save the closure we want to pass when the task is done, and then, we just call it from our overrode resume
Now, letās mock the session.
class MockURLSession: URLSession { typealias CompletionHandler = (Data?, URLResponse?, Error?) -> Void var data: Data? var error: Error? var response: URLResponse? override func dataTask(with request: URLRequest, completionHandler: @escaping CompletionHandler) -> URLSessionDataTask { let data = self.data let response = self.response let error = self.error let dataTask = MockURLSessionDataTask(closure: { completionHandler(data, response, error) }) return dataTask } }
Again, we have ivars for data, error and response. We can set them as we wish to exercise different portions of our code. Do we want to make sure the guard is kicked on when an error is there? Just create a session, set the error, and test.
func testOpenWeatherShouldFailWithError() { let exp = expectation(description: "Get weather data") let session = MockURLSession() let error = NSError(domain: "asd", code: 123, userInfo: nil) session.error = error as Error self.prepareRetreiveWeatherSessionDataSucess(session) let controller = OpenWeatherMapNetworkController(session: session) let input = Input(location: "Campana", unit: TemperatureUnit.metric) controller.fetchCurrentWeatherData(input: input) { (result: Either<NetworkControllerError, WeatherData>) in switch result { case .left(let error): XCTAssertNotNil(error) exp.fulfill() case .right: XCTFail("It should fail") } } waitForExpectations(timeout: 10, handler: nil) }
And obviously, you can also test for data to be correctly parsed, and because you are injecting the data yourself, you can check for specific values as well.
func testOpenWeatherMap() { let exp = expectation(description: "Get weather data") let session = MockURLSession() self.prepareRetreiveWeatherSessionDataSucess(session) let controller = OpenWeatherMapNetworkController(session: session) let input = Input(location: "Campana", unit: TemperatureUnit.metric) controller.fetchCurrentWeatherData(input: input) { (result: Either<NetworkControllerError, WeatherData>) in switch result { case .left: XCTFail("no data returned by fetchWeatherData()") case .right(let data): let city = input.location let condition = data.condition let temperature = data.temperature XCTAssertEqual(city, "Campana") XCTAssertEqual(condition, "Clear") XCTAssertEqual(temperature, 42.8) exp.fulfill() } } waitForExpectations(timeout: 10, handler: nil) }
A complete example can be found in Gist

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch ⢠No registration required ⢠HD streaming
Swift 2 Unit Testing & UI Testing Resources
Swift 2 Unit Testing & UI TestingĀ Resources
Starting to write unit tests in Swift 2 / Xcode 7 so thought I would keep a list of resources and share. Ā Plan to keep this post updated as I find more. Ā Feel free to ping additional resources in the comments!
Ā Talk by Jorge OritzĀ
brief overview by Natasha the Robot
UI Testing Cheat Sheet (thanks @gregheo )
(ā¦)
View On WordPress