Apr 22, 2021
peter singer making the journal of controversial ideas for people to have their work published anonymously out of fear of 'cancellation' just sounds like right wing anti science journal.. there's a difference between a safe space and accountability/authors allowing an open discussion for the articles they write. what good is an article that isnt open for discussion, doesn't that go against what they're setting out to do (allow a discussion without 'cancellation'. . bc nobody is ever actually cancelled. u can hit a road bump, but ppl always get work again because everyone eats up a 'devil's advocate'). what discussion can u have w an author who won't make themselves available..
