Oct 13, 2025
One of the things I think Scott’s mastered in his social game (aside from manipulation) is that his arguments don’t have to be 100% logical or free of holes so long as no one brings up any rebuttal.
Like if you argue with someone in defense of something that’s ‘wrong’, if they don’t have a rebuttal, they lose that argument. doubt creeps in.
So it never actually matters if he’s lying or hypocritical, because he’s persuasive enough that no one will point it out, and if they do, he’ll argue back until they stop.
