#thetateeffect

It’s not misogyny if she’s into it.

“This is satire. If the shoe fits, it’s probably your Etsy bio.”

Modern feminism has a huge problem—and it’s not misogynists.

It’s the women who secretly (or blatantly) want them.

For all the outrage, pearl-clutching, and Twitter thread dissertations about men like Andrew Tate being “dangerous,” women keep proving, time and time again, that they want exactly this type of man.

And not just want. Chase. Obsess over. Fight for.

Because here’s the truth they don’t want to admit:

👉 Hypergamy runs the show.

👉 Women date up, not down.

👉 And they don’t give a fuck if that "up" comes wrapped in a leather jacket of blatant, unapologetic misogyny.

📌 The Hypergamy Effect: Women Date Up, Not Down

First, let’s define hypergamy for the chronically uneducated.

💡 Hypergamy is the biological and social tendency of women to seek men who outrank them in status, power, and resources.

It’s not a choice. It’s not a conspiracy. It’s evolution.

📊 David Buss, a leading evolutionary psychologist, found in his 2019 study that across all cultures, women overwhelmingly prefer men with: ✔ More money ✔ More social dominance ✔ More ambition ✔ More physical presence

Not "equal." More.

Sound familiar?

Why do you think women flood Tate’s DMs despite his reputation?

Why do you think feminists cry about him online while secretly watching his videos in the dark like it’s porn?

It’s because hypergamy doesn’t give a fuck about ideology.

It only cares about status.

📌 The Data: Women Are Attracted to “High-Status” Men—Even If They Hate Them

If hypergamy wasn’t real, we wouldn’t have study after study proving it.

📊 A 2012 study by Fieder & Huber analyzed the dating preferences of thousands of women and found that:

✔ Women consistently rated men with high status, wealth, and dominance as more attractive—even if their personalities were “problematic.” ✔ They found high-status "assholes" more desirable than low-status "nice guys." ✔ Women repeatedly rejected men who had lower incomes or weaker social positions.

Translation? They can call it misogyny all they want. Their biology doesn’t care.

Even better? They are sexually aroused by it.

🧠 A 2008 study by Rupp & Wallen found that when exposed to dominant, "socially aggressive" men, women experienced higher physiological arousal than when exposed to "kind, nurturing" men.

You read that right.

They get turned on by the men they claim to despise.

📌 Tate’s DMs: The Leaked Receipts of Female Hypergamy

Still skeptical? Let’s talk about the actual receipts.

📂 Leaked screenshots from Tate’s personal messages—while he was actively being accused of misogyny and human trafficking—showed women flooding his inbox begging for attention.

Not just fans. Not just “lost, brainwashed” women.

We’re talking: ✔ Self-proclaimed feminists asking for his approval. ✔ "Anti-Tate" women secretly flirting with him. ✔ Women offering themselves up, unprompted, despite “hating” him.

So tell me again how “no woman wants a misogynist?”

Because Tate’s inbox tells a different story.

📌 Why Women Love What They “Hate”

💡 Women don’t actually want equality in dating.

They want status, power, and the thrill of dominance.

✔ They call Tate misogynistic, yet can’t stop talking about him. ✔ They say they want a “nice, emotionally available man” while chasing the very men they complain about. ✔ They "despise" male arrogance while drooling over men who treat them like an afterthought.

Hypergamy is undefeated.

And every outraged feminist tweet about Tate? Every think-piece about why he’s "problematic?"

It’s just free advertising for the exact type of man they can’t resist.

📌 Final Thought: The Lie of "Nice Guys Finish First"

Feminists say they want a world where men are gentle, kind, and respectful.

Yet they date the opposite.

They hate the men they want.

They date the men they claim to hate.

And when the receipts come out? They scramble for excuses.

Because no woman wants to admit that biology will always outrank ideology.

💀 REBLOG if the truth burns. 🔥 LIKE if you see hypergamy play out in real life. 💬 COMMENT if you’ve watched women contradict themselves like Olympic-level gymnasts. 🚀 FOLLOW for brutal, fact-driven breakdowns that hurt the weak.

⚖️ LEGAL DISCLAIMER: This post is written for the purpose of artistic expression, cultural commentary, and psychological exploration of social and gender dynamics. It does not condone or encourage violence, harassment, or discrimination of any kind. Any references to power, strength, restraint, or critique are metaphorical, symbolic, and rooted in historical and cultural analysis. This is not a call to action — it’s a cultural mirror. If you feel offended, ask yourself if it’s from actual harm — or from seeing something you hoped no one would say out loud.

💀 For the Women Who Pretend to Hate Him, But Would Fold in 0.5 Seconds 💀

Oh, so you “hate” Andrew and Tristan Tate? You “despise” them? You think they’re “toxic, insecure little men” who have “no real power over women”?

🧐 Interesting.

Because, for some reason, you’ve:

✔ Seen every Tate clip on TikTok. ✔ Read every article on them—twice. ✔ Somehow memorized their entire dating history. ✔ Spent more time talking about them than your own boyfriend.

💀 Sis. Come on. 💀

You don’t hate them. You want them. But you don’t want to admit you want them.

And that’s where this fun little checklist comes in.

Are you secretly thirsting for the Tates? Let’s find out.

🚨 CHECK EVERY BOX THAT APPLIES TO YOU: 🚨

✅ You say "he's just a narcissist" but if he told you to pack a bag, you'd already be at the airport. (One-way ticket to the Bugatti lifestyle, incoming.)

✅ You left a hate comment, but deep down, you hoped he’d reply. (Because any attention is better than no attention, right?)

✅ You’ve “accidentally” watched 50 Tate videos and analyzed his body language. (For "research purposes," of course.)

✅ You post about "hating" high-value men, but the last three guys you dated were broke. (And you hated them for it.)

✅ You claim “status doesn’t matter,” yet your dream man is rich, famous, and dominant. (Hypergamy’s undefeated.)

✅ You “hate” arrogant men, yet your panties have never dropped for a weak one. (Your dating history speaks louder than your feminism.)

✅ You “can’t stand toxic masculinity” but your fantasy involves getting pinned against a wall. (You didn’t dream about a sensitive poet, did you?)

✅ You say “strong, independent women don’t need men,” yet you’re mad when men don’t pay for dinner. (Pick a struggle.)

✅ You call him “dangerous,” but your favorite TV show is about a mob boss who cheats and kills people. (You love a good villain.)

✅ If Tate actually DM’d you, your morals would have an emergency shutdown. (And we both know it.)

💀 FINAL SCORE: HOW BAD IS YOUR TATE ATTRACTION? 💀

💯 0-3 boxes checked: 🧐 Mild symptoms of denial. But we see the cracks forming.

💯 4-6 boxes checked: 🔥 You’re deep in it. Your feminism is fighting for its life right now.

💯 7-9 boxes checked: 🚨 Just say you’d fold and go. No one’s buying the act anymore.

💯 10/10 boxes checked: 💀 You’re basically already in the Tateverse. Just admit you’d risk it all.

📌 FINAL THOUGHT: YOU’RE NOT MAD AT TATE. YOU’RE MAD AT YOUR ATTRACTION TO TATE.

Feminists aren’t fighting misogyny. They’re fighting their own biology.

💀 They don’t want “equality.” They want power—but only if the man is powerful enough to handle them.

So next time you feel the urge to call Andrew Tate a “loser” online? Ask yourself: Would you really say that to his face… or would you be too busy twirling your hair?

It’s okay. Denial is step one. Acceptance is step two.

💀 REBLOG if you know women like this. 🚀 FOLLOW if you’re tired of the fake outrage. 🔥 LIKE if you’re watching the internal struggle play out in real-time. 💬 COMMENT how many boxes you checked (no lying, we’ll know).

⚖️ LEGAL DISCLAIMER: This post is written for the purpose of artistic expression, cultural commentary, and psychological exploration of social and gender dynamics. It does not condone or encourage violence, harassment, or discrimination of any kind. Any references to power, strength, restraint, or critique are metaphorical, symbolic, and rooted in historical and cultural analysis. This is not a call to action — it’s a cultural mirror. If you feel offended, ask yourself if it’s from actual harm — or from seeing something you hoped no one would say out loud.