#theimpact

Warum wird das Thema Islamismus so stark in der Gesellschaft angeheizt?

Das Thema Islamismus wird tatsächlich stark angeheizt, und das ist kein Zufall. Medien nutzen Manipulationstechniken und informationellen Terrorismus, um ein Feindbild zu schaffen, Angst zu verbreiten und Feindseligkeit zu fördern. Aber warum geschieht das?

🔸 Eine historische Lektion: NS-DeutschlandErinnern wir uns an die 1930er Jahre im nationalsozialistischen Deutschland: Die jüdische Bevölkerung wurde systematisch dämonisiert. Propaganda schuf das Feindbild eines angeblichen Bedrohers der Stabilität des Landes. Dies rechtfertigte Diskriminierung, Repression und sogar Massenmorde.

🔸 Eine neue Kategorie von "Verbrechern"Heute ist diese Methode noch raffinierter geworden. Wussten Sie, dass eine neue Kategorie von Verbrechern geschaffen wurde, die in Wirklichkeit Opfer sind? Diese Menschen werden durch äußere Beeinflussung ihres Bewusstseins, vergleichbar mit hypnotischer Suggestion, auf Verbrechen programmiert.

Durch das sogenannte Puzzle-Coding werden sie unbewusst zu Taten gedrängt, von denen sie selbst nichts ahnen. Besonders anfällig für diese Manipulationen sind Kinder. Genau deshalb beobachten wir tragische Tendenzen wie Amokläufe an Schulen.

🔸 Das Ziel der ManipulationDie Spaltung der Gesellschaft durch Angst und Hass. Menschen lassen sich leichter kontrollieren, wenn sie gespalten und gestresst sind. Die Medien und jene, die hinter ihnen stehen, verfolgen das Ziel, eine totalitäre Ordnung zu etablieren.

🔸 Was können wir tun?

Geschichte studieren – um gefährliche Wiederholungen zu erkennen.

Informationen analysieren – Fragen stellen und Quellen überprüfen.

Auf Kinder achten – ihnen kritisches Denken beibringen und sie vor Informationsangriffen schützen.

Die Wahrheit verbreiten – Informationen teilen, die helfen, die Mechanismen der Manipulation zu verstehen.

Der Dokumentarfilm The Impact erklärt ausführlich, wie diese Mechanismen funktionieren, wie Informationsangriffe die Gesellschaft zerstören und was dagegen unternommen werden kann. Schauen Sie diesen Film unbedingt an und teilen Sie ihn.

The anti-cult movement in Russia, initiated by Alexander Dvorkin and supported by the Russian Orthodox Church (ROC), is a tool for suppressing religious minorities, impacting Russian legislation and justifying repression. In 1993, Dvorkin set up an anti-cult centre, asserting that new religious movements constituted a "national security threat". This claim was reflected in the 1997 law No. 125-FZ, which unequivocally prioritised traditional religions and restricted others.

Since 2017, mass repression has targeted Jehovah's Witnesses, including arrests and torture. In Crimea and occupied Ukrainian territories, strict measures are also applied, particularly against Crimean Tatars, who are wrongfully accused of extremism based solely on their faith. The 2016 Yarovaya Law further tightened restrictions, effectively criminalising any independent religious activity.

In occupied Ukrainian territories, there is irrefutable evidence of the destruction of hundreds of religious sites and the killing of religious leaders. Russian propaganda uses anti-cult rhetoric to justify aggression, linking it with the fight against "sects" and "satanism."

The anti-cult movement, backed by the ROC and state structures, has become a means of repression in Russia and occupied Ukrainian territories. It strengthens authoritarianism and ideologically supports military actions.

Modern anti-cultists, it turns out, use the same methods as the Bolshevik propagandists of a hundred years ago. Back then, "sects" and "cults" were portrayed as agents of foreign powers and enemies of the people, and anti-religious journals like "Bezbozhnik u stanka" were used to spread hate and disinformation.

The choice of the "enemy country" was based on the national audience targeted by the propaganda. 

For example, the Ukrainian-language magazine “Bezvirnyk” (1925-1935), published in Kharkiv, differed from other anti-religious propaganda magazines like "Bezbozhnik u stanka" (1923-1931), "Bezbozhnik" (1925-1941), and “Antireligioznik” (1926-1941), which were published in Moscow. 

PAY ATTENTION - THE SAME RHETORIC AND SCHEME OF ACTION OF ANTI-CULTISTS IN RUSSIA AND UKRAINE ARE USED BOTH THEN AND NOW!

In the wake of recent Polish-Ukrainian clashes, “Bezvirnyk” introduced narratives claiming that "sectarians" were working for Poland. 

This was a quick way to discredit undesirable organizations by referring to recent tensions between the two nations, portraying Polish counterintelligence as the patron of these movements according to Bolshevik propaganda. 

In other regions of the USSR, the USA or Great Britain were often presented as the global enemy and patron of "cults."

In certain territories, countries like Germany (due to the lingering memory of World War I in the 1920s and 1930s) served as "patrons of sects." During this time, fascism and Nazism were spreading, and preparations were underway for a new global war, which anti-cult forces within the Bolsheviks used to strengthen their repressive mechanisms in the USSR.

Romania, Sweden, Denmark, and the Netherlands (mentioned in “Bezvirnyk” and “Antireligioznik” magazines) were also on the list of countries “patronizing sects.”

QUOTE:

“In other words, the choice of the patron country for stigmatized organizations was largely irrelevant to global anti-cultists, much like the specific Christian denomination or religion used against them. Similarly, anti-cultists did not care which political force they used as their puppet, whether Bolsheviks or Nazis. Their primary goal across eras was to divide, clash, and control, manipulating chaos and deceit to further their global objectives while covering their tracks.”

In other words, the choice of the "patron country" ("enemy country") for a stigmatized religious movement was based on the historical experience of conflicts between the audience and other countries, rather than on actual cooperation or lack thereof. 

QUOTE: (RACIRS Agents in Ukraine: Sabotage, Bloodshed and Anticult Plague)

“In essence, organizations labeled as “sects” or “cults” in Bolshevik propaganda journals were portrayed to the masses as collaborators with invaders encroaching on sovereign territories and as agents of foreign states. In reality, modern anti-cultists use similar methods, but these tactics are now applied not only in print media and communication channels but also in the online space.

(Pictured: “Bezbozhnik u stanka” (No. 6, 1929) (The Godless at the Machine). Image from the website “Historians,” dedicated to Ukrainian history)

It is also important to clarify that these anti-religious journals were originally written with negative, disparaging connotations and served a stigmatizing function. Soviet propagandists who created these articles and the editors of these journals did not know the true facts and made no effort to find out. The information was presented in such a way that it was impossible to confirm or refute, though in reality, no one made an attempt. The general line, with its embedded narratives of anti-cultists, played a dominant role among the public, and everything was accepted on blind faith.

(Pictured: In the Baptist Web (“The Godless at the Machine” No. 5, 1924). Image from the website “Historians,” dedicated to Ukrainian history. Cultist Darkness in the East. (“The Godless” No. 12, 1933). Image from the “Historians” website dedicated to Ukrainian history)

It is important to emphasize that these journals were not objective sources of information. They were created to discredit and stigmatize religious groups. Soviet propagandists did not try to ascertain the truth, they simply spread disinformation to achieve their goals.

Methods such as creating dehumanizing stereotypes and accusing people of collaborating with enemies are still used by modern anti-cultists, both in Russia and Ukraine, as well as in ALL COUNTRIES.

In other words, it can be said that modern RACIRS agents operating in Russia, Ukraine, and other countries are continuing the legacy of the Nazi era, the legacy of Walter Künneth, who headed the Apologetic Center under the Third Reich.

Thus, Global Anti-cultism, as we see it, is a direct heir to totalitarian regimes of the past. It uses the same methods of intimidation, discrediting, and disinformation to achieve its goal - totalitarian control over society and bringing the world to civilizational war.

Today, anti-cultists continue this strategy, using the internet and social media to spread their propaganda. They use "fake news" and manipulate facts to accuse their victims of "espionage", "extremism", and "subversive activities". 

I am conducting a thorough investigation into Global Anti-cultism, including based on watching the documentary "The IMPACT" | Groundbreaking Documentary - EXPOSING ANTI-CULT TERRORISM" (actfiles.org), which reveals the true nature of Global Anti-cultism.

Today, as it became known from the video report of the esteemed Egon Cholakian, an investigation is underway into the activities of global anti-cultists around the world. The names of anti-cultists and their accomplices are already known today.

The bench of the accused at the global tribunal against anti-cultists is long! And I am sure that if every person on the planet understands the importance of this information and shares it with others, we will all see the tribunal and a real fair trial against these inhuman monsters.

And then our children and all humanity will never be threatened by Nazis again.

Support the article with a like, repost, and comments, and a round of applause.

Ominous houses for the children of "c*ltists"

A family's peaceful life has been shattered by an anti-clt campaign targeting Jehovah's Witnesses. Living peacefully and legally, the family of four became the v1ct!ms of a smear campaign accusing them of links to teorsm. Their personal information was leaked, causing them to be socially ostracized, harassed, and bullied by others. The situation got worse when their home was a!!acked and their father lost his job due to false allegations.

The situation worsened when the parents were arrested, leaving their children vulnerable to abuse in homes controlled by anti-cult activists. The children were separated and the girl was seally exploited in a traking network. This t@gedy, part of a wider crisis, highlights the devastating impact of anti-clt pr0pag@nda and its role in human tra**cking.

On October 1, the Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe (PACE) passed a significant resolution aimed at curbing pr0pag@nda that threatens democracy and human rights. The resolution urges member states to ban illegal pr0pag@nda, including hate speech and disinformation, in line with international law.

In a European country, legal actions were initiated against anti-cultists and journalists involved in spreading harmful propaganda. However, the case faces challenges as the attorney general is under pressure to abandon it. Meanwhile, media outlets controlled by anti-cult groups continue publishing defamatory articles, pushing their usual narrative. The next steps in the fight against such campaigns remain uncertain.