#tchr2003

TCHR2003 Curriculum Studies Assignment Help

Summary

TitleAssessment 2TypePortfolioDue DateFriday, 18th April 11:59pm AEST (Week 6)Length1500 wordsWeighting50%SubmissionWord document submitted to Turnitin (for written assessments).Unit Learning Outcomes

This assessment task maps to the following ULOs:

ULO1: describe and justify curriculum in early childhood education and care services

ULO2: understand and demonstrate conceptual knowledge relatedto key learning areas for children from birth to five years

ULO3: argue, with reference to the literature, how curriculum key learning

areas can be applied to support children’s learning

ULO4: create and analyse learning environments of curriculum key learning areas for children’s development and learning explain the role of the early childhood educator

Rationale

This unit develops conceptual knowledge of the holistic approach to curriculum in the early childhood setting. There is a focus on an integrated and holistic approach of learning domains for children aged from birth to five years. Students develop children’s conceptual knowledge of these domains, with links made to the Early Years Learning Framework [EYLF] (AGDE, 2022), National Quality Standard [NQS] (ACECQA, 2018) theory and literature.

Task Description

The purpose of this assignment is to develop deeper knowledge and understanding of how everyday objects, routines, and resources in the early childhood setting can be used to promote children’s learning and development across the learning areas (Australian Curriculum- Foundation year) with links to the EYLF Principles and Practices and Learning Outcomes and NQS QA. It is also important

that early childhood educators have a deep understanding of the role of children’s play in these learning environments to best promote children’s conceptual knowledge in learning areas appropriate to birth to five years. Assessment 2 requires you to analyse 2 early childhood education photos and explain how the environment is used to support children’s learning and development. Relevant links to theory and key learning areas and the EYLF Principals and Practices will be used to justify the pedagogical approaches used by the educator teacher to support children’s early learning and development.

Task Instructions

Use the template (including the cover page) provided in the Assessment 2 folder on the TCHR2003 Blackboard Site.

Part 1. (USE OF GENERATIVE AI (CHATGPT) PERMITTED FOR THIS PART)

Instructions: Use ChatGPT to generate an image of an Early Childhood Education learning environment (indoor or outdoor). You must screenshot the prompts that you use to create your image and include these as an appendix. The image that you create must have a play-based focus, and must consider 3 (three) of the following learning domains: language and literacy, creative arts, physical and emotional wellbeing, history and culture (time, equity and social justice)

Part 2 (YOU MUST NOT USE GENERATIVE AI BEYOND REASONABLE LIMITS FOR THIS PART)

Analyse how the learning environment in the image that you have created can support children’s learning and development by justifying what children can learn within the environment.

The analysis must make relevant links to:

2 (two) EYLF Principles 2 (two) EYLF Practices.

2 (two) relevant EYLF Learning Outcomes, 2 (two) relevant links to the NQS QAs, and

2 (two) links to specific developmental domains (physical/cognitive/language/social and emotional/creative).

Justify your discussions using theory, the unit content and relevant academic readings.

Part 3

Referencing

APA Referencing style is required to be used for this task

Include one reference list for all responses on a new page at the end of task

A minimum of 10 (ten) academic sources are to be included in the reference list

At a minimum, your sources for this task will include the EYLF v2.0 (AGDE, 2022), NQS (ACECQA, 2018), and a range of broader authoritative literature. Broader literature may include contemporary textbooks, peer reviewed articles, and other authoritative sources

Formatting: Use APA 7 formatting throughout (this includes indented paragraphs, double-lined spacing, Times Roman 12-point font).

Referencing Style Resource

About APA 7th — APA 7th Referencing Guide — Library guides at Southern Cross University (scu.edu.au)

Resources

National Quality Standard Quality https://www.acecqa.gov.au/nqf/national-quality-standard

Early Years Learning Framework https://www.acecqa.gov.au/sites/default/files/2023-01/EYLF-2022- V2.0.pdf

Unit materials to support your submission

The unit workshops will feature guest speakers and will support you to break down the requirements of the assessment task. Ensure that you either attend these live or watch the recordings as these will set you up for success.

An example of a completed task can be found in the Assessment task folder on the unit Blackboard sire and will be addressed in workshops.

Task Submission

Assessment 2 should be submitted using the Turnitin in the Assessments Tasks & Submission

section on the Blackboard TCHR2003 site.

You must label your submission with your surname and initials and the Assessment Task’s name. You must label your submission with your surname and initials and the assessment task’s name, e.g: JSmith student number_TCHR2003 Assessment 2.docx

You are strongly advised to undertake your own SIMILARITY CHECK via Turnitin, PRIOR to the due date, to identify and resolve any academic integrity issues prior to submitting — see SCU Academic Integrity and Turnitin. You can submit up to three times and receive the similarity match report immediately — after three attempts, you will need to wait 24 hours.

It is YOUR responsibility to ensure that you have submitted the correct file and the FINAL version of your assessment for marking BEFORE the due date/time.

Turnitin does not generate an automatic email receipt. If you have successfully uploaded your assessment, a green bar will appear at the top of the screen that says: Submission uploaded successfully: Download digital receipt. Use the hyperlink to download your digital receipt and store this with your assignment file.

If you have any difficulty submitting your assignment, please contact Technology Services and make sure that you log a job with them, so you have evidence of your attempted submission. To avoid any last-minute problems, make sure you submit well before 11:59pm on the due date.

Please note that re-submissions for the assessment tasks for this unit are not permitted as per SCU policy.

Academic Integrity

At Southern Cross University academic integrity means behaving with the values of honesty, fairness, trustworthiness, courage, responsibility, and respect in relation to academic work.

The Southern Cross University Academic Integrity Framework aims to develop a holistic, systematic, and consistent approach to addressing academic integrity across the entire University. For more information see the SCU Academic Integrity Framework

NOTE: Academic Integrity breaches include poor referencing, not identifying direct quotations correctly, close paraphrasing, plagiarism, recycling, misrepresentation, collusion, cheating, contract cheating, fabricating information.

For this assessment task: GenAI May be Used for Part 1 only

Generative Artificial Intelligence (GenAI) tools, such as ChatGPT, may be used for this Assessment Task. If you use GenAI tools, you must use these ethically and acknowledge their use. To find out how to reference GenAI in your work consult the referencing style for your unit via SCU Library

referencing guides. If you are not sure how to, or how much you can use GenAI tools in your studies, contact me as your Unit Assessor. If you use GenAI tools without acknowledgment it may result in an academic integrity breach against you as described in the Student Academic and Non-Academic Misconduct Rules, Section 3.

Special Consideration

Please refer to the Special Consideration section of Policy https://policies.scu.edu.au/document/view-current.php?id=140

Students wishing to request special consideration to extend the due date of an assessment task must submit a Request for Special Consideration form via their My Enrolment page as early as possible and prior to the original due date for that assessment task, along with any accompanying documents, such as medical certificates.

Late Submissions & Penalties

Please refer to the Late Submission & Penalties section of Policy https://policies.scu.edu.au/view.current.php?id=00255

Grades & Feedback

Assessments that have been submitted by the due date will receive an SCU grade. Grades and feedback will be posted to the ‘Grades and Feedback’ section on the Blackboard unit site. Please allow 7–10 days for marks to be posted.

Please note that re-submissions are not permitted for this unit as per SCU policy.

Description of Grades

… continued on next page…

Assessment 2 Rubric (TCHR2003)

Marking Criteria and & allocation

High Distinction +

(100%)

High Distinction (85–99%)Distinction (75–84%)

Credit

(65–74%)

Pass

(50–64%)

Marginal Fail (35–49%)

Fail

(0–49%)

Not addressed (0%)

Criterion 1: The image created has a play-based focus and has considered 3 (three) of the following learning domains: language and literacy, creative

arts, physical and emotional wellbeing, history and culture (time, equity and socialjustice). The prompts usedto create the image have been included in an appendix. (25%)

The image demonstrates an exceptional play-based focus,

seamlessly integrating all four learning domains with innovative andcreative approaches. The selection of prompts is highly effective,

clearly supporting the intendedlearning outcomes. The appendix is thorough, with detailed and well-organised prompts that offer clear insight intothe

design process.

The image has a strong play- based focus and effectively incorporates at least three learning domains. The prompts used

are relevant and enhance the educational value of the

image. The appendix is well- structured, providing a clear and detailed

account of the prompts used.

The image demonstrates a play-based approach and covers at least three learning domains. The prompts are appropriate and support the

image’s educational intent. The appendix includes all prompts, with a good level of detail and

clarity.

The image has a play-based focus and addresses at least three learning domains. The prompts are included in the appendix, thoughthere may be some gaps in detail or clarity. The integration of the learning domains is evident but not fully developed.

The image reflects a basic play-based approach and considers at least two learning domains. The prompts are included in the appendix but may lackdetail or relevance.

The image meets the minimum

requirements but lacks depth in connecting the learning domains.

The image has a limited play- based focus and may only address one or two learning domains. The prompts in the appendix are incomplete, unclear, or not well-connected to the image’s educational

objectives. Significant improvement is needed in

aligning the image with a play-based approach and the required learning domains.

The image lacks a play- based focus

and does not adequately address the required learning domains. The prompts may be missing,

irrelevant, or not included in the appendix. The work demonstrates minimal understanding of the

criterion.

No image submitted or the image is entirely unrelated to a play-based approach and the specified learning domains. No prompts are included in the appendix.

Criterion 2: Analysis regarding how the learning environment created can support children’s learning and development by identifying

analysing whatchildren can learn

Provides an exceptional,insightful analysis of

how the

Presents a comprehensive and well-

structured

analysis of how

Delivers a clear and detailed analysis of the learning

environment’s

Provides a satisfactory analysis of how

the environment

supports

Offers a basic analysis of the learning

environment’s

role in

The analysis

lacks clarity and provides

minimal insight

into how the

Demonstrates a significant lack of

understanding

of the learning

No analysis provided. The submission does not

address how

within the environment. Explanation and justification of the learning that could occur and the pedagogical approaches that the early childhood educator could implement in the environment.

(30%)

learning

environment supports children’s learning and development. Demonstrates deep, critical analysis of what children can learn within the environment,incorporating advanced theories and research.

Offers a highly convincing and original justification of pedagogical approaches, showing creativity and an exceptional understanding of early childhood education

practices.

the learning environment

fosters children’s learning and development.

Shows strong analytical skills in identifying learning

opportunities within the environment.

Justification of pedagogical approaches is clear, and well- considered, demonstrating a deepunderstanding ofrelevant

practices.

impact on children’s learning and development. Provides a solid analysis of learning

opportunities within the environment.

The justification of pedagogical approaches is thoughtful, demonstrating a good understanding ofrelevant

practices.

learning and development, with a basic

analysisof what children can learn. The justification of pedagogical approaches is sound but may lack depth or

strong theoretical support.

Demonstrates an adequate understanding of early childhood

practices.

supporting children’s development. The analysis of learningopportunities

may be surface level, with

limited detail. Justification of pedagogical approaches is present but may be vague or not fully aligned with best

practices in early childhoodeducation.

learning

environment supports children’s learning. The analysis is underdeveloped, and the justification of pedagogical approaches is weak, with

limited connection to practice.

environment’s role in supportingdevelopment. The analysis of learning opportunities is incorrect or missing, and the justification of pedagogical approaches is absent or

irrelevant.

the learning environment supports children’s learning and development, nor does it include any pedagogicaljustification.

Criterion 3: Analysis has included relevant links to 2 (two) EYLF Principles and 2 (two) EYLF

Practices.Relevant links to 2 (two) EYLF Learning Outcomes, 2 (two), 2 (two) relevant links to the NQS QAs, and 2 (two) links to specific

developmental domains

Analysis has included explicit and highly relevant links to 2 EYLF Principles, 2 EYLF Practices,

2 EYLF

Analysis has included clear and relevant connections to 2

EYLF Principles, 2

EYLF Practices, 2 EYLFLearning

Outcomes, 2

Analysis effectively links to the required EYLF Principles, Practices, Learning Outcomes, NQS

QAs, and

Analysis has clear links to at least 2 EYLF

Principles, 2

EYLF Practices, 2 EYLFLearning Outcomes, 2

NQS QAs, and 2

Analysis has some relevant links to EYLF Principles,

Practices, Learning Outcomes, NQS

QAs, and

Analysis has only limited or

unclear links to EYLF Principles, Practices, Learning Outcomes, NQS

QAs, and

Analysis demonstrates a significant lack of

understanding of the EYLF, NQS, and

developmental

No analysis provided. Thesubmission does not address the EYLF

Principles,

Practices,

(physical/cognitive/language/social and emotional/creative) have been made. The discussion is supported by theory, the unit content and relevant readings. (30%)

Learning Outcomes, 2 NQS QAs,and 2

developmental domains.

Demonstrates exceptional

critical analysis and synthesis of theory, unit content, and relevant readings.

Integrates contemporary research and advanced theoretical perspectivesseamlessly, showcasing

originality and depth of

understanding.

NQS QAs, and 2 developmental domains. The discussion is

strongly supported by relevanttheories, unit content, and high-quality readings.

Demonstrates critical thinking and a deep

understanding of early childhood education

frameworks.

developmental domains. The discussion is supported by appropriate theories, unit content, and readings. Shows good analytical skills and a soundunderstanding of the relevant educational

frameworks.

developmental domains. The discussion is supported by relevanttheory, unit content, and readings, though depth and critical

analysismay be limited.

Demonstrates a competent understanding of early childhood education

frameworks.

developmental domains. The discussion is supported by general theories and unitcontent but may rely on broad or

surface-level connections. Shows a basic understanding of the frameworks with limited

critical analysis.

developmental domains. The theoretical support is weak or minimally connectedto the unit content and readings. Shows a lack of critical analysis and a limited

understanding of educational

frameworks.

domains. The discussion is largely

irrelevant, with few or no appropriate links to the required

frameworks. Theoretical support is absent or misapplied, showing minimalengagement with unit content or readings.

Learning Outcomes, NQS QAs,

developmental domains, or relevant theoretical support.

Criterion 4

Referencing and Academic Integrity

Academic Literacy including

correct word count,correct writing conventions, use of professional language and academic referencing (APA 7th style).

A minimum of 10 academic references included.

(15%)

Flawless use of academic

writing conventions and APA referencing with a comprehensive range of high- quality,

authoritative sources. All references are

accurately

Accurate

academic writing and APA referencing with astrong range of relevant sources. Very minor formatting errors may be present. Word count within +/- 10% of the set word count.

Good academic writing and APA referencing with a range of appropriate sources, though there may be some errors or inconsistencies in formatting.

Word count within +/- 10% of the set word

count.

Adequate academic writing and

referencing with some relevant sources. Some minor and inconsistent

errors with formatting. Word count within +/- 10% of the set word

count.

Basic academic writing and referencing with limited sources. Some errorsand inconsistencies with formatting.

Word count within +/- 10% of the set word count.

Poor standard of academic writing and referencing with consistent errors in

most/all areas

Word count significantly under or over

+/- 10% of the set wordcount for the task

Significant improvement needed in

academic writing and referencing.

Referencing is absent,

incorrect, or irrelevant

Not attempted

formatted and seamlessly integrated into the content. Word count within +/- 10% of the set word

count.

High Distinction:

The student’s performance, in addition to satisfying all of the basic learning requirements, demonstrates distinctive insight and ability in researching, analysing and applying relevant skills and concepts, and shows exceptional ability to synthesise, integrate and evaluate knowledge. The student’s performance could be described as outstanding in relation to the learning requirements specified.

Distinction:

The student’s performance, in addition to satisfying all of the basic learning requirements, demonstrates distinctive insight and ability in researching, analysing and applying relevant skills and concepts, and shows a well-developed ability to synthesise, integrate and evaluate knowledge. The student’s performance could be described as distinguished in relation to the learning requirements specified.

Credit:

The student’s performance, in addition to satisfying all of the basic learning requirements specified, demonstrates insight and ability in researching, analysing and applying

relevant skills and concepts. The student’s performance could be described as competent in relation to the learning requirements specified.

Pass:

The student’s performance satisfies all of the basic learning requirements specified and provides a sound basis for proceeding to higher-level studies in the subject area.

The student’s performance could be described as satisfactory in relation to the learning requirements specified.

Fail:

The student’s performance fails to satisfy the learning requirements specified.