Tifa said that showing Tankrannosaurus Rex more often undermines his effectiveness as a villain and ruins the suspense and mystery of the character.

Aeris, who saw the reboot before the original, argues that the suspense element isn't as important due to Tank-Rex being so iconic and well-known now, and that she prefers the reboot giving more screen time to Tankceratops and Tank-Rex's complex rivalry.

We're all frustrated by that cliffhanger ending, though. Definitely making time to watch Part 2 soon.

I can NOT make up my mind on this one so please help me:

On the one hand, I'm 100% not allowing vehicles that happen to resemble dinosaurs, or have dinosaur designs on them, but are still vehicles (such as Robirdo), in the same way that a pirate ship with a mermaid on the masthead does not suddenly become a mermaid.

On the other hand, if you were to remove the legs of a triceratops and replace it with tank treads, would it still be a triceratops? If yes, then what if you changed everything but the head? Similarly, if you put a triceratops head on, say, the body of an octopus or something else very clearly not a dinosaur, would THAT still count as a dinosaur? Or if you put the head of any other animal on the body of a triceratops? Where do we draw the line?

Tifa is demanding that we head to the nearest town with a movie theater to see the new Tankceratops remake.

We actually met the guy once while he was filming near Gongaga. He was...very loud.