seen from Argentina
seen from Yemen
seen from United States
seen from Singapore
seen from China
seen from Singapore
seen from Italy
seen from Vietnam
seen from China
seen from Brazil
seen from United Kingdom
seen from Türkiye
seen from Türkiye
seen from China
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from Germany
seen from United States
seen from China
seen from United States
i had to block someone yesterday because they were glorifying insys abuse so i want to make my stance clear
I FUCKING LOVE MY HEADMATES. THEY ARE MY CLOSEST FRIENDS. THEY HAVE TAUGHT ME SO MUCH AND IM SO LUCKY TO HAVE THEM. I LOVE THEM DEARLY AND YOU SHOULD TRY TO HAVE COMPASSION FOR YOUR HEADMATES TOO 🔥🔥🔥
Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch • No registration required • HD streaming
I wrote a whole f-cking poem about this that I may or may not publish but. I need to stop looking at syscourse. People are arguing over whether or not pluralphobia is bad enough to care about and what kinds of discrimination it's okay to draw parallels between and I'm just here like. Okay. Great. So anyway, regardless of these slapfights, I'm still stuck depending on openly and specifically pluralphobic family – as in, my own family I directly depend upon who have outright stated their hostility towards systems specifically– to be housed and fed. I have met multiple other systems offline in my local area who are stuck in the same position I am, with unsupportive if not outright hostile and hateful family. We are forced to remain closeted for our own safety and to ensure our basic needs are met. Can we focus on problems like that, please? We can hold the Oppression Olympics after we get a start on making sure vulnerable systems are safe.
every single person who argues that the DSM totally agrees with endogenic plurality because the DSM doesn't have trauma in the diagnostic criteria for DID despite the much more reasonable explanation being amnesia that may involve your childhood being a criteria and maybe that's to account for the people who literally might not be able to remember any of their trauma and maybe their whole childhoods and not the completely un proven notion that DID without trauma totally exists is an ableist and i'm tired of these people getting to go completely unchallenged by their own communities so much of the time
if you're wondering why i'm saying this i have two reasons
1. spreading misinformation about a disorder to validate yourself is ableist?????? hello?????
2. historically whenever people are challenging the trauma basis of DID they are doing so because they don't believe it's real eg the fantasy theory, the "your therapist made you like this" theory, and even the empowered multiples who thought multiple selves were simply a natural state of being that couldn't be caused by trauma, and whenever i see people explaining why they think there's some other cause they either have no other explanation besides misinterpreting the DSM or share a concerning amount of points with people who don't believe DID is real
edit: no this post is not referring to the claim that plurality or alters exist outside of DID it is specifically referring to the claim that DID does not require trauma to form because trauma is not a criteria in the DSM, it's also not referring to criterion D, loud sigh
i hate the pipeline of "what is your stance on endos?" to "do you support the hypothetical concept of endogenic plurality?" to "do you think endogenics should be allowed to find safe spaces?" to "how do you personally feel about endogenic systems (because this will change the course of history in the plural community as we know it for the rest of time)?"
like no. no no no. remind me why we're debating others' identities again? we as a community have so much infighting that we're not even paying attention to the real issues: FDC, ableism + sanism in the psychiatric industry towards plurals, and most importantly *making a safe space for plurals in the world.*
listen. "what do i think of the endos?": i don't give a shit. genuinely. i couldn't care less about someone's system origin. it's not that big of a deal. like, if you're traumagenic, endogenic, quoigenic, neurogenic, cool cool. but as someone who Could Not Give Less Of A Fuck, i will not be debating your identity/ies.
We were originally only on Pinterest before we got Tumblr
Man Pinterest is apparently just a pool of syscourse almost every post or profile you'd see had either "[insert syscourse stance or just endos in general] DNI!" or something about syscourse it was so annoying
-Ash-fall/vix he/him
Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch • No registration required • HD streaming
>find new youtuber I like >"oh cool this guy posts about systems" >"these people pretend to have DID >:(" >"oh."
I thought we decided long ago that it was not effective to force an apology out of someone and that it was inappropriate to take over the syscourse tag or harass others to do it. Or does that only count when the action is done by an anti-endo?
"DNI endos.... Like endoskeletons??? Fnaf??? That's definitely not what it is but idfk what it is."
A genuine thought we had the first time we stumbled into syscourse in DNI's by the way.
-Tommy
Don't use this post to start syscourse or I'll steal your kneecaps btw. Be nice.
