Eurusâs haunting syntax
Iâm aware that this probably sounds weird at first, but, as a writer myself, I tend to notice syntax/statement patterns - especially, when theyâre outstandingly cryptic and contrary to the usual atmosphere of themes/words/sentence structures used. As to that, Eurus is a riddle Iâd love to solve; and I think Iâve drawn an conclusion that might be significant to the Faith!Eurus/Faith Smith-issue.
At first, some of Eurusâs most remarkable statements (you may see where Iâm going with all of this while reading them):
âGood and bad are fairytales.â (nice Moriarty-mirroring, btw) âGood isnât really good, evil isnât really wrong, and bottoms arenât really pretty.â âSmiling is advertising.â âSmiling is happiness.â âHappiness is a pop song. Sadness is a poem.â âHelping someone is the best way you can help yourself.â âWithholding the precise deadline will apply the emotional pressure more evenly.â âThe gun is intended as a mercy.â
She combines two things in an almost philosphical, cryptic, complex, extraordinary, partially disturbing way whose meaning you can still decrypt in general - I guess that is how Moftiss want to emphasize her ability of âreprogrammingâ people.
She uses parataxes in order to make her statements more poignant and rememberable. Also, this way of talking/writing makes things generally more convincing, because it is simple, short and does not leave place or time for doubts.
So, yeah, Eurus is quite manipulative. (To an extent that most of her sentences are stuck in my head, because they are also structured like a catchy tune.)
With this knowledge, letâs move to the first scene we get to see Faith - the ârealâ one:
Obviously, she is not played by Sian here; but isnât it interesting that they decided to just partially make a voiceover with Sian's voice? The connection between Faith and Eurus still has to be subtle at this point, so the only time we get to hear Gina is when she is off-screen (âAnd what is that?â) - subtle way of messing with our senses while we probably donât even notice it, because we donât get a face to connect the voice with, which is why our brain doesnât quite notice that it is fooled.
By the way, do you feel reminded of something, knowing about Eurusâs remarkable syntax now, when Faith - voiceovered by Eurus - is saying this line:
? In this context, hearing Faith say those words, donât make too much sense, I think, since it does not fit into her actual sentence structure (which is quite ordinary, btw) and therefore sounds like a quote - by Eurus?
Think of it: The entirety of this scene is about memory alteration/erasing. This is even the way Faith is introduced to us; knowing that Eurus got hold of her note somehow and later visited Sherlock in 221B, âdisguisedâ as Faith, where she even shows a picture of the real Faith to Sherlock, how is it even possible that Sherlock doesnât notice the difference between those two women?
Maybe, because they arenât two different persons.
Faith is fake? Yes. In some way. I think so for two reasons:
When she enters the mortuary, âYou Look Differentâ is playing - and there is Moriarty-notes playing throughout ONE whole minute - though Moriarty, obviously, is not present. Give me another plausible explanation than the one I have come up with if you will, because it is driving me NUTS: Moriarty caused all this mess and messed with Sherlockâs memory by the use of TD-12 (the way Faith is introduced to the audience and the theme she is heavily associated with - so, maybe, she is an allegory for exactly that: for memory alteration?) - even though I still donât know for what explicit reason.
The voiceover with Eurusâs voice and Faith!Eurus make my alarm bells ring heavily, since Price and Arnold said that - although it is heavily altered and almost not recognisable - scenes with Faith!Eurus contain Eurusâs notes indeed, though in a âburiedâ way. But why is it âburiedâ? Why does it have to be? Iâm telling you: If they wouldâve associated Faith with Eurus more blatantly, if they wouldnât have remained subtle about the Faith-issue, if they would have put even more focus on the obvious fuckery revolving around Faith and Eurus!Faith, more people would have maybe started to question their senses and the hidden clues and themes of the show; people wouldâve started to maybe re-watch it, looking for inconsistencies/parallels/alterations as we do. But you know what? âIgnorance is bliss.â
This one has been done for us.
The following is not totally related to the post above, but I wanted to add it: There is something remaining unsolved to me (maybe Iâve missed the resolution to the following fuckery, so please explain it to me if I have and you know whatâs going on). Some minutes ago, I read through some predictions and meta Iâve written, after TST had aired, (I wanted to check some things for the post above) and was startled, because one interesting question occurred to me, as I read through some prediction I made regarding âElizabethâ - oh, you donât know who that is? Well, currently, me neither - so, why is E!Eurus listed as âElizabethâ in the TST-credits?
















