The marketplace for creators? Or a private SuperFollow room for the VIPs?
Looks like @twitter is pulling an American Express from the 80s: “Membership has its privileges." By creating a marketplace for creators, #SuperFollow appears more to be a VIP room you subscribe to. Not good. We need a 21-century Agora, a public square for all. Here are a couple of my own translations of how Twitter's help center describes Super Follows:
Translation: Hey, non-sup followers of mine! OMG, you don't know what you're missing. I wish I could show what they said, but you gotta subscribe to their VIP tweets first. Or if you want to participate in and engage with this tweet, you also gotta subscribe.
(Subscribe to creator's VIP tweets)
OMG, you super followed me. Thank YOU. Welcome to the VIP room. Swank, right?
Translation: Oh yeah, you see all these other folks sharing specific info in this community, er, VIP room, you gotta pay each of them.
So how much does it cost to belong to this exclusive group?
**for demo purposes only:
Let's say you want to create a VIP room for 130 people.
And you're willing to spend $4.99/mo. Let's simplify: $5/mo. For some folks, perhaps $650 a month is the cost of super following each other.
Or there's @SlackHQ or @Discord.
After doing a bit more sleuthing about Super Follows, I stumbled on a 10/25 tweet from a former senior community manager at Twitter.
@SBkcrn framed Super Follows as a community. But if I have to pay for a subscription to receive a creator's special feed, I see that more as an audience and NOT a community. I, too, believe creators should be paid for their expertise and talents. But don't frame it as a community.
I'm sorry to see that Simon tweeted on 11/3 that they were among those that were let go unceremoniously, to say the least, early this month. I'm sure they can't talk about it, but I do wonder if the team knew they were working on a paid membership product when they were working on the Super Follows Community feature.














