The person who sent me these messages has also contacted Dr Moorjani since in relation to a certain (possibly heavily edited) screencaps of an email. Dr Moorjani has been informed that a letter alleged to be the one sent to The Guardian was published on a known troll blog.  It is Dr Moorjani’s prerogative to deal with this matter if she chooses to.  If privy, we will inform as necessary.  The question remains however.  If it is proven that it was not tampered with, why upload it in the first place? Two professors, an instructor and a plagiarism expert from a prominent US university all believe this to be an act of plagiarism, but that does not mean Dr Moorjani would believe it to be so. She agrees the piece liberally borrows from her work, but Dr Moorjani knows that not much can be done about it.  All she can do is voice her displeasure, which she has done.  I honestly doubt any more will come from it.  If I am proven wrong however, so be it, but that does not prove that BSD/NEAnon are not a troll.
Now, I have spent the past day and a half creating a 2 part post that has a lot more detail than this.  I have 42 screencaps from 8 different people, all explaining to me their concerns and their beliefs and explains what it is exactly that they’re up to.  This is the Cliffs Notes version.  If anyone would like me to post the 2 part post, I am more than happy to.  This is not us ‘outing’ anyone.  This is us looking out for others so they are not being duped anymore.
Lastly, I received a submit from Choppy where she asks some questions she would love answers to.
http://wikianonbc.tumblr.com/post/126085649844/why-bsd-is-sbchs
This is your evidence Wiki? a skeptic telling you that bitchsophiedaily has them blocked and shit-bc-haters-say also has them blocked, therefore they have to be the same person?
And a post from bitchsophiedaily that my favorite sea-lion thinks that, because bitchsophiedaily doesn’t scream PR PLANT when somebody tweets favorably about Sophie, must come from a skeptic? do you realize how deluded and paranoid you both sound?
And, as far as I’m concerned, since the sea-lion involved me for some reason in all of this, let me say two things:
1.- I never paid attention to that comment from Bitchsophiedaily because before the Moorjani email, I NEVER VISITED HER BLOG. She’s small potatoes, sorry to say. I remember making a snide remark when she revamped her blog as bitchsophiedaily after the first one got deleted, because of the description of her blog, but that’s it. You can take a look at my archives if you don’t believe me. It’s all there.
2.- Yes, I commented about the accusations from Bitchsophiedaily because I enjoy petty dramas, especially if it involves skeptics fighting each other. No conspiracy here. I wasn’t trying to bait anybody. And it would be quite foolish of me, since 99% of the skeptics have me blocked, so there is no chance they’ll ever see what I post unless they visit my blog.