Another day, another need to come up with good notation

seen from Malaysia

seen from Germany
seen from United States

seen from Chile

seen from Austria
seen from Spain

seen from Malaysia

seen from United States

seen from United Kingdom
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from Japan
seen from United States

seen from United Kingdom

seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from Malaysia
seen from United States
Another day, another need to come up with good notation

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch • No registration required • HD streaming
PhD Post Week 35
Despite hell descending upon the UK again for the third time in two months, this week has been very productive! Sadly no seminars anymore cause term's over so I only have my project to talk about.
This calculation I've been doing has gone even quicker than I expected! Past me did a lot of good work setting up the tools to actually do this effectively. I actually spent Tuesday and Wednesday writing up everything I did since the last time I updated my document. I will say I've done a lot of combinatorics. Basically all of my arguments can broadly be classes as "let's count the number of dimensions". Though it did mean using the Rank-Nullity Theorem (ol' reliable).
My next goal is to generalise what I've done in the semifree case to the full algebraic model. This shouldn't actually take too long; I think it's mostly a case of bookkeeping and maybe introducing a bit more notation to do things effectively. Once this is done, that's my original goal achieved!! But this certainly isn't the end, there's another question I can tackle after this using what I've done. I've already been thinking about it a bit and it's already quite interesting!
Oh actually there is one small thing not related to my project! There are two conferences coming up in the next few months that I'm hoping to attend! Already applied to the first one and I'm hoping to hear back soon (not least so I can book flights etc). The second one doesn't have a website yet, but my supervisor has assured me it will be happening haha
Why is typing things up so hard
Pretty neat that the rank-nullity theory is making an appearance in my research
I have been somewhat needlessly fancy and named something "the core" because it always appears

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch • No registration required • HD streaming
I've had an interesting topology thought. You know how smooth functions C ᪲(ℝⁿ,ℝᵐ) are dense in C⁰(ℝⁿ,ℝᵐ) and we can upgrade that (trivially in this case) to saying that we can approximate continuous functions by smooth functions which are homotopic to the original function. Well I also know that any continuous function between smooth manifolds is homotopic to a smooth map. So my first question is, is it the case that C ᪲(M,N) is dense in C⁰(M,N) and can we ensure that smooth approximations to a continuous function are always homotopic to the function? (Here I am assuming we're doing the standard thing by equipping C⁰(M,N) with the compact-open topology). I expect the density part is true, at least when N is ℝⁿ or if M is compact. The homotopy condition is probably more subtle. If N is contractible then all continuous maps are homotopic so nothing has really been said. Though perhaps you can argue locally and approximate a continuous function on each coordinate patch and then use a partions of unity argument to get a global smooth map that approximates the continuous map and is homotopic to it? I don't know how much control we have we partions of unity in that regard. Consulting Lee's Intro to Smooth Manifolds it is indeed true that C ᪲(M,ℝᵐ) is dense in C⁰(M,ℝᵐ) (Theorem 6.21).
This is all sounding rather close to analysis but I'm also thinking about a more broader context. Like can we treat the cellular approximation theorem in the same way? That is, are cellular maps between CW complexes dense in continuous maps such that approximates can be made to be homotopic to the original function? Or similarly the simplicial approximation theorem? Are there any other contexts where this is a meaningful question?
I think what I'm most interested in is the possibility of having a class of maps are dense in continuous maps and that any continuous map is homotopic to a map in this class but where approximations can't be made to be homotopic to the original function. My intuition here is fairly limited by thinking about this in ℝⁿ
PhD Post Week 33
Despite literal hell descending upon us I've managed to have another pretty productive week!
Seminars:
The algebraic topology seminar this week was about Bredon sheaf cohomology which was pretty cool! It's always nice when there are talks on stuff that's actually vaguely related to things I'm interested in.
The postgrad seminar was interesting. It was about studying how planes intersect in weighted projective spaces. My main interest was about the topology of these weighted projective spaces but I didn't ask cause I don't think the speaker would've known the answer (I know him and I don't think he's thought much about CW complexes and most certainly not in this context).
No junior algebra seminar this week cause the speaker cancelled due to the heat (not that I'dve gone anyway cause I worked from home yesterday precisely because of the heat).
Summer Project:
I've made very good progress again this week! I managed to generalise my method for calculating things in the semifree case to the full case. I'm definitely glad I did the semifree stuff first because it made it way more obvious what I should try to do for the full case.
I'm not sure I'll make as good progress next week as I'll be moving onto a slightly different (but related) computation. But it's almost certainly going to be more fiddly but if I can get it in fully generality it might be something publishable. My next task will be to try to do this computation in very easy cases and hope it will illuminate a way to do it more generally.
My supervisor and I have decided to put aside this other part of my project that we were hoping to do cause it's not really related and would just distract from the first goal. Kinda sad but equally I'd rather make sure I do this stuff well.
I've also come up with another question actually related to what I'm doing that's quite interesting that'll probably also be publishable if I can answer!
Other Stuff:
I also had the rehearsals for my presentation next week (all the first year PhD students have to give an 8 minute talk next week). Mine went pretty well. One of the staff giving us feedback was an applied mathematician and he said he managed to get something out of it which is pretty impressive. I did ramble with my answers to questions, which is bad cause we'll only have two minutes in the actual thing. But I think I know how to cut one of the answers down and it's a question that's likely to be asked.
PhD Post Week 32
This week's been pretty good! I've made decent progress and I'm understanding things a lot more! I did have to take yesterday off and work from home today because I've been to tired to go into uni. However, as I said the progress I've made has been good! My supervisor meeting this week was especially good because I got all my questions answered in a way I understood them. I also felt like I was more having a conversation with my supervisor. Like I actually had decent things to say rather than just listening and absorbing.
Seminars:
The algebraic topology seminar was very interesting and a well given talk. It was about trying to understand BDiff(M) for compact connected 3-manifolds in terms of the BDiff(P₁⊔⋅⋅⋅⊔Pₙ), where Pᵢ are the irreducible manifolds in the prime decomposition of M (except not S¹×S² though, even if the manifold has it as a connected summand I can't remember why). The jist was the speaker (and collaborators) construct a map using some ∞-categorical techniques and are abled to fully describe it's fibre in a nice combinatorial way.
The postgrad seminar was alright. It was a geometric analysis talk about the Plateau problem and results about regularity of solutions. It was a decently given talk, it just isn't my sort of thing.
Summer Project:
The extra stuff my supervisor had me working actually turns out to be a better way of doing the calculations I'd already done. It's a lot clearer what's going on and feels way less hand wavy. Originally he got me to work on a simple case because the goal was to get things done in more detail to allow us to calculate something slightly different. However it turns out the general method was very useful for the general case. Whilst I don't wish to pursue the full case in as much detail it's possible in theory (it just requires multiplying lots of polynomials together and I'm not sure it's worth it and my supervisor agrees).
A fun this is I had to produce a matrix whose entries are elements of ℚ[x,x⁻¹] which is fun! (Actually this part was my idea, when my supervisor was playing around with things he just wanted a matrix over ℚ but thought my idea was probably more fruitful!)
My next goal to do this slightly different calculation using this matrix description of the map we're interested in. I also want to continue more calculations in the full algebraic model rather than just the semifree model. I've just been rather focused on redoing the semifree stuff this week