Somatic Lab #5: Yes, and.
When writing Strangers at the Event Horizon together, Matt and I needed a container for our collaboration (well, let’s be honest, I needed a container for the work). We decided no topic, theme, or form was off the table—yeah, that’s a pretty voluminous container. To give the text shape, we decided to let the structure answer the questions we struggled with: how do we write a text that honors our separate selves and holds the places of our exchange; how do we write a text that does not rely on call and response—reaction; how do we renegotiate beginnings, endings, starts, and stops—who “goes first”—who “has the last word”? Inspired by Gesture Press, we generated a structure that required a gesture—to read, one must turn, not just each page, but the whole book. The shape of the infinity sign, embodied in the gesture of rotation, helped us craft the container for this work. Thus, this book can be read starting in Matt’s section, reading the horizon line collaboration, and finishing by reading Kristen’s section in retrograde AND can be read starting in Kristen’s section, reading the horizon line collaboration, and finishing by reading Matt’s section in retrograde. The compositional unit became the page; the text subverted sequence. Fortunately, we were working with Heather Goodrich, Sally Seck, Lindsay King-Miller, and Brenna Lee at Gesture Press or we would have been in big time trouble! Matt and I had to use the participatory model (so many leadership and improv workshops) “Yes, AND” and the Gesture Editors had to sound back “Yes, AND” and somehow this whole project found its way into publication based on these two magnificent words!
Ok, enough about us. Let’s dig into the lab!
Yes, AND.
This exercise (and Strangers) is about permission and not permission (rape, taking, grasping, holding). The economic climate in America is reinforcing a “desperation culture” (and vice versa). One must say yes to every job offer (there will not be another), every new redistribution of the workload (if you won’t do it, we don’t need you) etc. Loyalty, human potential, and opportunity create the space for personal and social progress; these are not valued in the American workforce. In a desperation culture, it is being stripped of our ability, opportunity, right to say “NO” that makes saying “YES” so hard in writing and sharing ideas. Permission is the space to be vulnerable; the lack of this space reduces permission, strips permission, decenters the relationship between self and other (and Other and other and Other and self)
We need a big healthy dose of “yes, and.” This writing exercise can be done alone, with a partner, and with a group. It requires all participants to listen and respond with “yes, and.” The use of “however,” “but,” “on the contrary,” etc. halts and stops the process (shrinks the space). Decide where you are and when you are—that is your container.
First person writes down a sentence. Second person reads sentence/listens, creates the coordinating conjunction yes, and continues to write down the next sentence. Keep it passing; keep it going for as long as the group can sustain the yes, and. Where does the story go? What is its shape? If it were a body, what would it look like? If it were a city, how would it be planned? How much space is surrendered? Restored? When is it time to turn the page?
We would love to hear the results and/or process of this experiment. Feel free to share here!







