#small-cells

#SuryaRay #Surya The Federal Communications Commission plans to designate 100 MHz of spectrum for small use, which would go a long way in encouraging the deployment of a dense layer of mobile broadband capacity for our smartphones to romp around in. But there’s a catch: carriers don’t just get to buy this spectrum and lock it into their networks – they have to share it with the government agencies already occupying it. The FCC’s plan is part of larger, and quite controversial, proposal first put forth by the President’s Council of Advisors on Policy and Technology (PCAST) to clear 1000 MHz of airwaves for mobile broadband use. That’s far more than Obama administration is aiming for in it broadband plan, but PCAST’s recommendations all coming with the sharing caveat: instead of booting the feds out of their airwaves, the public and private sectors must find a way to coexist. FCC Chairman Julius Genachowski The FCC is chipping away at the recommendation one spectrum band at a time, and it’s choosing to start with the 3.5 GHz band. In his announcement Wednesday, commission chairman Julius Genachowski would take formal steps by the end of the year to open the 3.5 GHz band for small cell use. While Genachowski never mentioned the word “sharing” in his statement, Ars Technica confirmed with FCC officials that the plan was to make 3.5 GHz shared between its current government radar use and wireless carriers. All of the major carriers in the US have talked up small cells, though Sprint is the only one that has laid out a specific deployment timeline. Sprint plans to deploy tens of thousands of the tiny base stations in 2013 and 2014, starting with malls and big public venues and then moving into high-traffic outdoor areas. At GigaOM’s Mobilize conference next week, Sprint CTO Stephen Bye will share more details on Sprint’s small cell plans. The 3.5 GHz band would be ideal for small cell deployments. By creating a separate band for the tiny little networks, carriers wouldn’t have to worry about interference with their primary macro networks. Rather than try and wrap big tower-based macro cells around small cells using the same frequencies, a dedicated band means micro-and pico-cells could be placed directly under the macro umbrella. Each of those small cells would have the same capacity of their larger counterparts, so adding dozens of small cells beneath a single macro cell would boost its capacity enormously. Also, higher frequencies don’t propagate as far as lower ones, which is why carriers have always sought to acquire lower band spectrum whenever possible. Since small cells, by definition, have much tinier coverage areas, they’re ideally suited for such high-frequency spectrum. Don’t expect carriers to fall over themselves to get this spectrum, though. The operators would rather own their licenses outright than share them with anyone, and the big carrier trade group CTIA has said that spectrum sharing in many cases simply won’t work. There’s two different ways to share the airwaves, divvying them up by time and by geography, and according to CTIA they both present problems. In the case of small cells, carriers need that capacity most in dense populated areas where there are numerous customers competing for bandwidth within a limited space. So if the government’s radar facilities are geographically distance, say out in the desert, then spectrum sharing could work. If they’re at a busy metropolitan airport, that’s another story altogether. The same goes for timesharing. If the government only uses those frequencies in the wee hours of the night, then carriers could easily turn their small cells off as traffic on the network is at its lowest point. The problem is if feds need their airwaves during the peak hours of the day, which is when carriers need them most as well. We’ll see more details emerge as the FCC starts its deliberations, but even if a spectrum sharing compromise can be worked out at 3.5 GHz, don’t expect the carriers to embrace this deal. They don’t want to set a spectrum sharing precedence, so they’re likely to lobby the government to clear out as much of this spectrum as possible for their own exclusive use. _Photo courtesy of Shutterstock user Everett Collection_ --- http://dlvr.it/2955XB @suryaray

#SuryaRay #Surya If the growing number of small cell specialists is hoping to break out big in the United States, they should probably look at other carriers than Sprint. The country’s third-largest mobile operator revealed two vendors for its small cell rollout, and they happen to be the same companies that are building its primary umbrella network. Sprint will be one of the first carriers to use Alcatel-Lucent lightRadio Cube metrocell architecture, and it will deploy Samsung’s own miniature base stations throughout its footprint. These pint-sized cells pack a lot of capacity into a tiny area compared with macrocells, which spread their bandwidth over a much larger space. Sprint will initially focus its small cell rollout on high-traffic indoor venues, such as stadiums, transportation hubs, conference centers, hotels and airports. But eventually those small cells will begin to eke outside, supplying a dense layer of capacity in urban environments under the macro umbrella. Sprint will almost certainly assign Samsung and Alcatel-Lucent venues in the same markets they’re building Sprint’s new CDMA and LTE networks. Sprint has a third infrastructure vendor as well, Ericsson, so don’t be surprised if we see another small cell announcement come out in the next few weeks. --- http://dlvr.it/1zjyHc @suryaray