#sedentism

Once the basic assumption of the superiority and attraction of fixed-field farming over all previous forms of subsistence is questioned, it becomes clear that this assumption itself rests on a deeper and more embedded assumption that is virtually never questioned. And that assumption is that sedentary life itself is superior to and more attractive than mobile forms of subsistence. The place of the domus and of fixed residence in the civilizational narrative is so deep as to be invisible; fish don't talk about water! It is simply assumed thar weary Homo sapiens couldn't wait to finally settle down permanently, could not wait to end hundreds of millennia of mobility and seasonal movement. Yet there is massive evidence of determined resistance by mobile peoples everywhere to permanent settlement, even under relatively favorable circumstances. Pastoralists and hunting-and-gathering populations have fought against permanent settlement, associating it, often correctly, with disease and state control. Many Native American peoples were confined to reservations only on the heels of military defeat. Others seized historic opportunities presented by European contact to increase their mobility, the Sioux and Comanche becoming horseback hunters, traders and raiders, and the Navajo becoming sheep-based pastoralists. Most peoples practicing mobile forms of subsistence- herding, foraging, hunting, marine collecting, and even shifting cultivation while adapting to modern trade with alacrity have bitterly fought permanent settlement. At the very least we have no warrant at all for supposing that the sedentary "givens" of modern life can be read back into human history as a universal aspiration.