Learn Sample Variance tutorial - A complete guide of about sample variance in Data Science and its formula with examples.
seen from Türkiye
seen from Austria
seen from United Kingdom
seen from Singapore

seen from United States
seen from Uzbekistan
seen from United States
seen from Uzbekistan

seen from China

seen from Germany
seen from China
seen from Canada
seen from Canada
seen from Japan
seen from China
seen from China

seen from United Kingdom
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
Learn Sample Variance tutorial - A complete guide of about sample variance in Data Science and its formula with examples.

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch • No registration required • HD streaming
Uncertainty Wednesday: Sample Variance (Cont’d)
Last Uncertainty Wednesday, I used meteorite impact data to make the point that sample variance may be much smaller than actual variance. Following the post, I was asked a great question on Twitter: “Is there such thing as estimation error on sample variance?” The answer is yes. Just as we saw earlier that the sample mean has a distribution, so does the sample variance. If you have different samples, you will get different variances and those will form a distribution. We are thus faced with exactly the same inference question as we were with the sample mean. How do we go about using the sample variance to estimate the actual variance?
I will write a lot more about inference in the future, but for now suffice it to say: the biggest mistake being made (and it is being made all the time), is to mistake the sample mean/variance for the actual mean/variance. And today I will give more examples of real life situations where the sample variance is highly likely to grossly underestimate the actual variance.
The first example are natural disasters, such as floods or earthquakes. These are cause by physical processes in the earth and its atmosphere. Both of these contain ridiculous amounts of energy (with the energy in the atmosphere currently increasing rapidly due to climate change). As a result it is extremely unlikely that any past sample includes the maximal possible event. In fact, if the maximal possible event had occurred, we might not even be here to read and write about it. So whenever you look at disaster event data and variance analysis based upon them, it is safe to assume, that the sample variance underestimates the true variance.
The second example are economies and financial markets. Both are systems of human activity and with massive human interventions aimed (explicitly or implicitly) at keeping volatility low. For instance, in the economy we have governments and central banks engaging in anti-cyclical policies (at least that’s generally what they attempt), such as fiscal or monetary stimulus during a downturn. In financial markets, there are many trading strategies that have the effect of reducing volatility, such as trading assets against each other based on their historical correlations. Such as strategy will, at least temporarily, re-enforce those correlations, even when they are no longer warranted. So economic and financial markets data is another example where the sample variance will underestimate the true variance.
Now as it turns out, my language here isn’t entirely precise. What we are really dealing with in all of these examples, going back to my “suppressed volatility” posts, are situations in which the variance itself has a variance. Come again? Simply put: variance can be low at times and high at other times. Most sample periods will be of lower variance (volatility). Even if you include the higher variance occurrences as long as you average everything out your variance estimate will be too low. And as I argued above in the case of flood and earthquakes (also true for meteorites), even if you are going with the largest observed variances only, you will still be underestimating actual variance.
So what are we to do? Well as I will explain in the coming posts, this is why explanations are so crucial. Inference from data without explanations is how people go deeply wrong about reality.
Uncertainty Wednesday: Sample Variance
Towards the end of last year in Uncertainty Wednesday, I wrote a post about suppressed volatility and gave an example. I ended the write up with:
if we simply estimate the volatility of a process from the observed sample variance, we may be wildly underestimating potential future variance
This turns out to be true not just for cases of “suppressed volatility” but much more broadly. For any fat tailed distribution, the sample variance will underestimate the true variance. Mistaking the sample variance for the actual variance is the same error as mistaking the sample mean for the actual mean. The sample mean has a distribution and the sample variance has a distribution. Whether or not they are an unbiased estimator for the true values depends on the characteristics of the process.
Consider objects colliding with earth. Small objects strike earth with relatively high frequency. But how should we use a sample? The article from NASA says:
The new data could help scientists better refine estimates of the distribution of the sizes of NEOs [Near Earth Objects] including larger ones that could pose a danger to Earth
That will only work well if we take into account that we know that over longer time periods there have been much more massive impacts although these are often millions of years apart. This is the hallmark of a fat tail distribution: rare large outlier events. Naively using a sample that does not include these large strikes would give us a dramatic under-estimate of the true danger for humanity.
Next week we will look more at what this means (including other examples) and what we can do about coming up with estimates in these situations.
Variance: A Measure of Dispersion
Variance: A Measure of Dispersion
Variance is a measure of dispersion of a distribution of a random variable. The term variance was introduced by R. A. Fisher in 1918. The variance of a set of observations (data set) is defined as the mean of the squares of deviations of all the observations from their mean. When it is computed for entire population, the variance is called the population variance, usually denoted by , while for…
View On WordPress

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch • No registration required • HD streaming
在統計學中,我們感興趣的全部個體或項目所成的集合稱為母體 (population),譬如,某農場的羊群,某國家的人民。母體的一個未知或已知數值稱為參數 (parameter),通常用來定義統計模型,譬如,某農場羊寄生蟲的發病率,某國家人均所得變異數。為了估計母體的參數,我們從母體選出一組個體或項目稱為樣本 (sample)。只要不含未知參數,任何一個由樣本數據構成的函數都稱為統計量 (statistic)。所以參數用於母體,而統計量則用於樣本。本文介紹線性代數觀點下的三個基本統計量:樣本平均數 (sample mean),樣本變異數 (sample variance) 和樣本共變異數 (sample covariance)。