TT: Were you serious about wanting to die? Yes. TT: Why? I'll tell you later. […] Because that piece of information would not fit elegantly into the sequence of our exchange at this moment. TT: Then you know how this entire conversation will go? Yes.
By the way, I think I’ve solved the mystery of Scratch’s dark spots – and, potentially, his omniscience itself. It's a bit of a meta answer, but this is a meta comic. I think it fits.
Here's my take: Scratch knows exactly what Hussie knows, at the time of writing. No more, no less.
Hussie, while writing this conversation, has access to all the information about Homestuck that currently exists. He 'knows everything' about the world of the comic - or at least, everything that's set in stone.
But he doesn't necessarily know what the next line is going to be, simply because he hasn't decided yet. Hussie knows 'everything' - but at the time of writing, Homestuck still has 'dark spots' that he hasn't filled in.
In time, though, each dark pocket will be filled.
Unlike Hussie, Scratch doesn't get to decide what these dark pockets contain - but in every other sense, his knowledge of Homestuck is exactly equivalent to Hussie's. He is omniscient, in the sense that he has access to all the information about Homestuck that currently exists - everything that's been decided by the author.
I think an example will further illustrate what I’m getting at.
Out-of-story, Hussie decides that Terezi is going to message Scratch. In-story, Scratch doesn't know how she achieved it, simply because Hussie hasn't decided yet. His omniscience can supply him with any information that exists - but this information literally hasn't been created yet. Just like Hussie, Scratch has to 'figure it out' instead.
So that's it, I think. Doc Scratch's omniscience is author clairvoyance, with all the benefits (and drawbacks) that that entails. He can know things that we don't know - things that Hussie has decided, but not written - but he can never know what Hussie doesn't know.
Plus, this explanation also puts a new spin on some rather odd phrasing he just used.
An explanation of his death wouldn't 'fit elegantly' into their exchange?
That's not how a character thinks.
That's how an author thinks.












